Pick of the Web
The Thing
The decision of the British government, led by prime minister Tony Blair, to support the United States’s preparations to overthrow Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq was extremely controversial in the country. There was massive popular protest and bitter criticism in the press and broadcasting media.
The government tried to win public opinion to its argument that the Iraqi regime – through its remaining weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and active programmes to develop those weapons – was a clear and present danger to Britain as well as to its region.
In September 2002, the government published a dossier on Iraq’s WMD. In a foreword, Tony Blair wrote: “What I believe the assessed intelligence has established beyond doubt is that Saddam has continued to produce chemical and biological weapons, that he continues in his efforts to develop nuclear weapons.”
Before, during and after the war of March-April 2003, the reliability and use of this “intelligence” (secret information) lay at the heart of debate about the war’s justification, purpose and legality. The political atmosphere in Britain became more tense, public opinion more animated, media coverage more frenzied.
“What name to give such a government it is difficult to say. It is like nothing that ever was heard of before. It is neither a monarchy, an aristocracy, nor a democracy…Such is the government of England; such is the thing which has been able to bribe one half of Europe to oppress the other half.” [William Cobbett, Register 33 (1818)]
One of the British government’s most respected advisers on Iraq’s WMD, an experienced weapons scientist who had worked with the United Nations to disarm Iraq during the 1990s, was the microbiologist David Kelly. As part of his job with the ministry of defence, he had regularly briefed journalists on an unattributable basis. On 22 May, he met and talked to a BBC radio journalist called Andrew Gilligan in a London hotel.
On 29 May, Andrew Gilligan alleged on the BBC’s flagship morning radio programme that the British government knew that a key piece of intelligence information presented to the public in the September 2002 dossier – that Saddam possessed WMD that could be launched within 45 minutes – was false. Gilligan sourced this allegation to “one of the senior officials in charge of drawing up that dossier”.
On 1 June, a newspaper hostile to the government published an article by Gilligan accusing Alastair Campbell, the prime minister’s chief of communications, of “sexing up” (embellishing) the dossier.
Campbell expressed outrage at the accusation of deceit, and was publicly scathing in criticism of the BBC’s coverage of the issue. Over the next month, both government officials and media engaged in strenuous efforts to identify the source of Gilligan’s allegations.
David Kelly confided to his superiors that he had spoken to Gilligan, but disputed the latter’s version of their conversation. Kelly’s name gradually became known to senior government, civil service, and intelligence officials, and to BBC executives.
After his name entered the public domain, Kelly was interviewed on 15 July by the foreign affairs committee of the lower house of parliament. In a strained, televised encounter, he denied being the source of Andrew Gilligan’s claim about Alastair Campbell’s role in the September 2002 dossier.
“Their reactions are invariably ones of disbelief, dismay and, occasionally disgust…Their overwhelming view is that no press is as intrusive, offensive, quasi-pornographic, arrogant, inaccurate, salacious and unprincipled.” [non-British journalism students at London’s City University on the British press, quoted in Hugh Stephenson and Michael Bromley, eds., Sex, Lies and Democracy: the press and the public (1998)]
On 17 July, David Kelly left his home in the village of Southmoor, Oxfordshire to go for a walk. The next day his body was found, the cause of death loss of blood from a wound on his left wrist.
The government announced an independent public inquiry into the circumstances surrounding David Kelly’s death. It was led by a senior judge, Lord (Brian) Hutton, and lasted from 1 August to 25 September 2003.
Hutton published his report on 28 January 2004. It substantially exonerated Tony Blair, Alastair Campbell, and senior civil service and intelligence officials from blame; it was severely critical of Andrew Gilligan, and of the BBC’s management and editorial procedures.
After the Hutton report, the BBC’s chairman (Gavyn Davies) and director-general (Greg Dyke) resigned, followed by Gilligan. Most newspapers, and a large section of British public opinion, remained censorious of Tony Blair’s government, and regarded the report as a “whitewash” of its role.
As the public argument continued, the British government announced a further inquiry into the pre-war use of intelligence about Saddam’s WMD. Its chair is Lord (Robin) Butler, formerly head of the civil service and adviser to several prime ministers.
|
Sources:
|
Tall tales and home truths
Why are government and media in Britain so hostile to each other? Because each seeks to control the narratives that shape peoples lives, says Tom Bentley of the think-tank Demos. In the process, both are damaged and so is democracy itself.
Uganda's hidden war
A delegation from Uganda carries a message about peace, justice and freedom.
Re-presenting Africa: an interview with Sorious Samura
How do you tell African stories that engage a world audience? The pioneering African news journalist Sorious Samura a streetwise sophisticate talks to Caspar Henderson and Caspar Melville of openDemocracy.net about war, famine, Africa and reality TV.
'It's the system, stupid!'
A third visit to the World Economic Forum left the sustainability campaigner John Elkington enthusiastic about a gathering force which can connect pro- and anti-globalisers: social entrepreneurs.
Iraqi realities, American dilemmas: a New York debate
What political choices should the United States now make in Iraq? Christopher Hitchens, Mark Danner, Samantha Power and David Frum debated recently in front of a packed New York audience. James Westcott was there.
A populist wind
Anyone But Bush read the campaign buttons. As John Kerry tightens his grip on the Democratic race for President, Todd Gitlin witnesses a return to class warfare.
Next stop Lebanon?
The war on terror faces problems in its Iraqi and Afghan theatres. Pakistan is a gnawing worry, Syria an irritation, for United States planners. Their possible response? Widen the battlefield.
'Who is this Lord Hutton?'
After Hutton, Butler. The successive British inquiries into the fallout of the Iraq war, led from the heart of the political elite, are designed to protect the people from knowledge of their governments misdeeds.
In an African voice: a profile of Sorious Samura
The broadcasting schedules of global media have little space for Africa, still less for Africans who want to tell their own stories. Sorious Samura, the Sierra Leonean journalist, has forced the river to flow upstream in a series of remarkable films. As his latest, Surviving Hunger, is shown worldwide, openDemocracy's media editor Caspar Melville profiles him.
How should the BBC be regulated?
The BBC is under the spotlight following Lord Huttons report, which criticised its coverage of the British use of intelligence in the run-up to the Iraq war. How can the broadcaster recover from its latest collision with power?
It's <i>still</i> the economy, stupid!
Heavenly business, Gordon Gekko, and Super Bowl forecasting plus figures and quotes of the week
'This machine kills fascists'
How committed are we to free speech? In the first of his new monthly columns on life in America, Siva Vaidhyanathan, passionate champion of liberty, abandons the cause when faced with airport security, his wife and the ghost of Woody Guthrie.
Media power: telling truths to ourselves
The crisis in Britain over the Iraq war, its intelligence and its reporting, is one of media as well as politics. John Lloyd asks: can journalism, both press and television, tell stories for active citizens rather than cynical couch potatoes?
Iran between worlds
How do Iranians see the world its foreign policy establishment, its dissident intellectuals, and its ordinary people? Charles Grant, recently in Tehran for a week's discussions, presents a vivid portrait of a political system under pressure.
Tony Blair and Iraq: a public tragedy
The Hutton report reveals the crisis of the British model of governance. Tony Blair and the BBC alike have fed the public realms manipulative populism, says David Marquand. Will Blairs leadership now be consumed by it?
Headscarves and freedom
Young womens public display of Islamic belief exposes Europes fears about immigration. Dave Belden takes the long view.
Genocide and global citizenship
Can humanity learn a new way of thinking, and thus break the pattern of a century of violence?
The greater power
President Bush gets fundamental. Senator Kerry storms home in the New Hampshire Primary. In the third of his weekly columns on the US election, Todd Gitlin looks at the key figures and does the math.
Back to the Future
Want to know the five top stories of 2004? Take a trip on Professor Ivor Clues time machine.
This week's guest editors
Our guest editors James Ron, Leslie Vinjamuri, Sophie Arie and Archana Pandya introduce this week's theme of:
Our guest editors James Ron, Leslie Vinjamuri, Sophie Arie and Archana Pandya introduce this week's theme of:
A Turkish Spring?






.jpg)































