A general's advice for American liberals

"We took a helluva beating,” the late great General Joseph Stillwell groused on marching his malarial, worn-out, battle-weary troops out of the jungle in the China-India-Burma theatre during World War Two. His grimly realistic assessment of how the Japanese defeated his GIs did not endear him to the War Department bureaucrats who found a way to sideline him for the rest of the war. (For a brief time he was my commanding officer.) But Stillwell’s sobering view of how best to defeat the enemy contributed significantly, in the long run, to Allied victory. Kerry voters need General Stillwell right now. Someone bracing and un-b.s.-able who won’t ladle out twaddle about hope, new beginnings and "it’s time to begin the healing”, as Kerry told his supporters in his Faneuil Hall concession speech. Personally, I was dismayed that Kerry and the Democratic Party establishment, after vowing to “count every vote and make every vote count”, so hastily threw in the towel before all the votes had been processed in Ohio (among other places). It was not Kerry and the Party’s decision to make. His candidacy would never have gotten off the ground if not for the amazing groundswell of enthusiasm and hands-on help he got from ‘the troops’, the men and women, boys and girls, who gave themselves heart and soul to his campaign. What arrogance! As if Kerry, not we, were the driving force. I am a sore loser by nature. After watching the Republican smear job on Kerry and by extension any critic of the President’s policies I see no reason to be more than minimally polite. To hell with graciousness. What did that ever get us, in Gore’s 2000 and this year, except another kick in the groin? Ever since this year’s party primaries Karl Rove and his bat-cave minions have counted heavily on our decency and forbearance and good taste - all marks of the good liberal, or so it’s said. This licensed the Bush-Cheney-Rove machine to go for the jugular, implying that liberals were Godless friends of the terrorists or, worse, tax-raisers. Why be polite? Disrespect for conventional thinking may have lost 'Vinegar' Joe Stillwell his job but in the end got America its victory. There was a time when the word liberal meant fighting liberal - loud, abrasive, forthright and intolerant of cant, the latest example being “moral values”. On almost all sides we are now told we lost because we lacked religious conviction. The poll-and-focus-group-driven architects of Kerry’s defeat, such as the Democratic Leadership Council’s Al From and others, now hasten us to more losses by demanding, “We’ve got to close the cultural gap”. Those are code words for Republicanizing the Democratic Party and de-gutting its liberal wing a sure fire way, if history is a guide, to total disaster. We did our best, and it wasn’t good enough. We took a helluva beating but not, if you study the figures, by all that much. Bush’s ‘decisive’ victory wasn’t a cliffhanger nor was it overwhelming. There’s room for improvement. Some years ago the defunct conservatives were reborn as a winning party by borrowing wholesale basic strategies from the left, such as patiently building from the base up and creating viable coalitions. Bush’s Republican tacticians have proven good students of left-of-center politics. In 1964 Barry Goldwater lost to Lyndon Johnson by 23 points managing to carry just six states. But the conservatives didn’t give up. They regrouped and fought back. By 1968 Nixon crushed Humphrey in the electoral college 30l-191. Can we not copy our copiers? Here’s a modest suggestion. Instead of reliance on expensive focus groups, demographic studies and temperature-taking polls, which do very little except fatten the wallets of pollsters, why not try honest blunt crude speech? Starting with the most cursed word in the political vocabulary: electable.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Hobbes
19 November 2004 - 4:48pm
Much to be said for Clancy Sigal's tough talk (it might be nice if he included a brief bio, for those with shorter memories than mine). Clancy says "Here’s a modest suggestion. Instead of reliance on expensive focus groups, demographic studies and temperature-taking polls, which do very little except fatten the wallets of pollsters, why not try honest blunt crude speech?" But consider the approach taken by Ken Mehlman, from this morning's NY Times: "Mr. Mehlman, who is in line to become the new chairman of the Republican National Committee, [delivered] a report on the Bush campaign that was at times boastful and at times revealing, as he described unusual methods that he said accounted for much of Mr. Bush's 3.5-million-vote margin of victory over Senator John Kerry. For example, Mr. Mehlman, in discussing a get-out-the-vote operation that surprised Democrats in many parts of the country on Election Day, said the Republicans had moved away from traditional operations, adopting the tactics of corporate America to identify potential Bush supporters. Rather than dispatching troops to knock on doors in neighborhoods known to be heavily Republican, Mr. Mehlman said, the Bush campaign studied consumer habits in trying to predict whom people would vote for in a presidential election. "We did what Visa did," Mr. Mehlman said. "We acquired a lot of consumer data. What magazine do you subscribe to? Do you own a gun? How often do the folks go to church? Where do you send your kids to school? Are you married? "Based on that, we were able to develop an exact kind of consumer model that corporate America does every day to predict how people vote - not based on where they live but how they live," he said. "That was critically important to our success." http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/19/politics/19repubs.html?pagewanted=all Victory has a thousand fathers, of course, but I'm not going to put all my money on the horse called "Crude Speech"
clancy@jsasoc.com
23 November 2004 - 10:48am
Keep putting your money on crude, clear and clarifying language, Mr Hobbes. The Republicans will always be better than us at corporatizing the vote. We have only one card to play: blunt speech. The Iraq war is not a 'foreign policy issue' but a GI or Iraq woman's fractured jaw and corpses rotting in a sewage filled street. Tax cuts are highway robbery of the middle class. Moral values is thinly disguised antisemitism and misogyny. Etc. Our models are Orwell in 'Politics & the English Language' and HL Mencken, and of course Mark Twain. We rail at the Bushes for misusing and manipulating language, but so do we. Here's a brief bio: I am a novelist and screenwriter (Frida) and journalist in Los Angeles.
Hobbes
23 November 2004 - 5:51pm
Dear Clancy Sigal-- I know who you are and admire your work. Thanks for contributing to the forum. I, too, am for clarifying language, forcefully delivered. Liberals have moral values too: equality, justice and peace, for one (that's three in one). But take a look at Matt Bai's article in this past Sunday's New York Times Magazine, which recounts election day in Columbus,Ohio. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/21/magazine/21OHIO.html?oref=login Faced with "Night of the Living Dead," we're going to need something more than just moral clarity.
helem407
30 January 2007 - 4:23pm
Atten: Mr Clancy Segal -- My husband Emile Pincus, brother of your late friend Harry Pincus, is trying to get in touch with you. Could you please advise how... thank you, Helen Pincus

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <h2> <h3> <div> <span> <blockquote> <!--break--> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <hr> <br> <table> <td> <tr> <img> <map>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.

You can avoid the word verification above by joining the openDemocracy community - if you have already registered, log in here