Quote of the day

The sudden assertion of human criteria within a dehumanising framework of political manipulation can be like a flash of lightning illuminating a dark landscape

Vaclav Havel

Syndicate content

Login

Login or Register to be identified in your comments

Everydaylifemodern

Email & RSS

Sign up to oD's editorial summaries email:



Follow oD on Twitter


Add oD to your Netvibes: Add to Netvibes

openDemocracy likes

After Kyoto, Whats the future of climate policy?


Posts: 36
Joined: 2005-07-16
My latest article on Climate Change is now availible from: http://climatechangeaction.blogspot.com/2005/11/what-is-future-of-action-on-climate.html This article is focused on possible future frameworks for action on climate change, and possible new measures to achive the greatest result at the lowest cost. With Russian ratification of the Kyoto Protocol during 2005 attention has quickly shifted to what happens next. The Kyoto commitment period ends in 2012 and no clear plan for what follows currently exists. In this article however I am not purely looking a what happens after Kyoto in terms of an international framework, rather I am looking at the spectrum of future international measures which may be used for climate change mitigation. Any descendant of Kyoto is likely to draw from key features of the UNFCCC, but will also have to make significant improvements. The key issues to be addressed are: * the need to bring developing countries into the system * the need to engage with the united states * the need to deal with both historical responsibility and adaption * the need to achieve far greater global emissions reductions.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Posts: 18
Joined: 2005-11-29
Re: After Kyoto, Whats the future of climate policy?
Without the USA, China and India its a waste of our time money and effort to bother with GW ... GW has probably been quite beneficial up to now (increased rainfall etc). Lets not forget that we don't know that it needs to be dealt with - Life on Earth will certainly not perish whatever we raise CO2 levels to, indeed nature will definitely thrive under raised CO2, its only humans that might be threatend and even that's not certain. Dare I suggest that the focus should therefore be not to do anything except get the big three involved.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options