I dedicate this article to the more than 5000 women who have lost their lives or been wounded by gun violence in my home-state of Manipur in Northeast India.
As the world knows, India is the birthplace of Mahatma Gandhi, the land where non-violence was born. Last year the United Nations declared that his birthday, 2 October, would become International Day of Non-Violence. The India that existed at the time of independence championed peace and disarmament. However, sad to say, the India of today is very different. While many know of India's economic rise, I know of an India that is weaponized and arming itself to the teeth.
In February 2008, over 450 arms companies came to India's capital New Delhi to sell their wares at an international arms bazaar. India, my country, is the second most heavily armed nation in the world, and the majority of an estimated 40 million firearms are in civilian possession. There are 900,000 arms-licensed holders in the state of Uttar Pradesh alone, while the number of arms dealers is pegged at 1400. In the words of one gun dealer at the bazaar, "Gun shops are mushrooming in the state of Uttar Pradesh like public telephone booths".
Living with the gun
I have seen and felt the sense of fear that the gun instills. When I came to Delhi from Manipur, I felt a need to understand the weapon that has controlled our lives on the Indo-Burma border. Let me take you back there to illustrate why women like myself and many others are taking steps to stop gun violence.
Northeast India has been facing the onslaught of ethnic-based armed conflicts since the late 1940s. The region is home to more than 70 major population groups and sub groups, speaking approximately 400 languages and dialects. The fire of insurgency has long engulfed this strategic region and has held development to ransom. Violent and vociferous demands by different ethnic groups for independence and for new states in the Northeast have been made for the past five decades. I believe that no other region of India, South Asia, indeed the world, must have seen such a proliferation and mushrooming of militant outfits which now form a complex matrix.
Growing up in this region, I thought all this was natural. It was only after I came to New Delhi that I realized that the situation was not at all normal. I then stumbled upon a 1997 UN document titled "Trafficking in Small Arms and Sensitive Technologies". That book combined with a white paper on small arms written by the Canadian Government, changed my life and inspired me to undertake research into arms proliferation in my society. I conducted research for over two years and published my research findings as a book, titled South Asia's Fractured Frontier (New Delhi, Mittal Publications, 2002). I discovered fifty-seven types of small arms which have flooded into Northeast India in the past few years. The weapons came from China, Pakistan, Belgium, Thailand, Russia, United States of America, United Kingdom, Czechoslovakia, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Burma and of late, Israel.
The effect of this small arms proliferation has been alarming. Young people have taken up the path of gun violence resulting in death, decay and destruction socially, politically and economically. Every year 300,000 people are killed around the world because of small arms. In Manipur, not a day passes without a gun killing. Writing this book empowered me to keep on working on gun control however, so I can safely say that research undertaken by women is one of the important ways that women can act to control gun violence.
Mobilising civil society
In 2001 the UN addressed the issue of small arms and light weapons for the first time in its history when it launched the United Nations Programme of Action on Small Arms and Light Weapons (UNPoA). UNPoA has become a dead paper for many countries, but for some concerned citizens it was a real opportunity to take further action against guns and gun violence. We organized meetings on the issue in India in five different cities - Manipur, Delhi, Jammu, Mumbai and Chennai - and we called upon the government of India to implement it. However, even as India kept submitting report after report to the UN on the small arms issue claiming that it was adhering to UNPoA, the work was never translated on the ground. In response, we mobilized civil society and in 2004 formed the Control Arms Foundation of India in New Delhi (CAFI). The aim of the foundation is to address issues relating to the proliferation of small arms and light weapons as they effect civil society, particularly women, children and the elderly, and also to create a movement in the sub-continent where defence and security issues are debated through informed debate, particularly as they relate to policies.
CAFI proposes new ideas for thinking about security, for instance to look at women-led disarmament policies and programmes to make human security a fundamental right, and to make disarmament a movement in the country, which is meaningful to people's lives. The formation of strong civil society organization directly addressing the issue of small arms is one of the most effective actions taken by women in India to combat gun violence.
The Control Arms Foundation's work has included re-drafting India's gun legislation. We are working with a team of lawyers and have identified several loopholes in the Indian Arms Act, namely:
- There is no definition of "prohibited persons" and it is left to the discretion of the licensing authority in granting and refusal of licences
- punishment for violation of the law is lenient
- there is no system for making instant criminal background checks
- there is no coherent system for conducting a census of the registered arms and ammunition by the respective state governments, whether by a self-disclosure scheme, police authorities or by a special wing in the Collectors Office.
We are calling for a restriction on the number of guns per household to one; currently an Indian citizen can procure three weapons per licence. We are also demanding that the permission of two household members, one of whom should be a woman, must be sought while applying for a gun licence.
Besides this work, we also lobby Indian disarmament officials, parliamentarians and think tanks, and network with other NGOs. We have conducted mass awareness programmes such as an essay contest titled "What guns have done to my country?" We also made three films; "Gun Wars and Drug Deaths (2003)", "Gunning for Control (2006)" and "The Story of the Manipuri Women Gun Survivors (2008)" on gun control issues and organized photo exhibitions related to gun violence.
Breaking the mould in Manipur
A third area of our work against gun violence takes the form of direct intervention in the lives of women gun survivors. As women we have set up the Manipur Women Gun Survivors Network (MWGSN), which is the first of its kind in India to offer victim assistance to women gun survivors.
Manipur is one of the most conflict-ridden states in India. In 2006 alone, nearly 300 people lost their lives to gun violence. The women of Manipur suffer most in this conflict - even when they are not directly targeted. They are traumatized by the deaths of family members. They bear the brunt of both the emotional and socio-economic impacts of violence and many women have become impoverished after the killing of male relatives, who had been working for the survival of the family.
The idea for the Manipuri Women Gun Survivor Network (MWGSN) came from an incident on 24 December, 2004. That Christmas Eve, I witnessed the aftermath of the killing of 27-year-old Buddhi Moirangthem in Wabgai Lamkhai village in Manipur. There, a group of three gunmen dragged Buddhi from his car-battery workshop. And within minutes they shot him dead. Even today, his 24-year-old widow Rebika Akham does not know who the killers were and why they killed her husband. Days after the incident, 4500 rupees were contributed by myself and other committed people to buy a sewing machine for Rebika. This was the first ever intervention of MWGSN and enabled her to stitch clothes for villagers and to secure a living. The Manipuri Women Gun Survivor Network was formed in 2007 to help women like Rebika Akham.
MWGSN attempts to lift women above the trauma and agony faced in the conflict. It helps women survivors of gun violence to find ways to heal the scars which decades of living under the shadow of a gun have caused the community. Direct intervention is based upon a gender sensitive approach to the gun crisis, and by supporting women economically it brings them forward to play a crucial role in small arms policy. It is the first initiative of its kind in India. It assists in small-scale entrepreneurial work and is working towards building sustainable livelihood measures for gun-affected women in Manipur. Manipur enjoys a distinct place among the handloom zones in India and like many of the Manipuri women most of the gun survivors are skilled in making handloom and handicraft items. The Network helps women gun survivors to open bank accounts and provides small loans of 3000 to 9000 Rupees. With the help of this money the women are able to carry on work such as silk reeling, weaving and other occupations such as fishery or mushroom farming.
We also form "solidarity networks" of committed young people who believe in helping the survivors and controlling the use and spread of small arms. They keep in touch with these women and assist them in whatever way they can. Women affected by gun violence can now live their lives with newfound courage.

Later this month | How do we dismantle the institution of war?












Comments
What the [edited to remove obscenity - BigC] are you guys doing? STOP restricting gun freedoms to law abiding citizens. Let them carry and be armed and if you are going to disarm - disarm the bad guys first - who by the way NEVER obey the laws anyway. Stop making decent people into sheep dressed up for slaughter. Jezz! When are you going to learn that your "good guys" do not show up till many dead bodies litter the ground? When are you going to learn that the only possible way of giving the good guys power to resist the bad ones is to allow them to be as heavily armed as they deem fit.
You should only talk about illegal arms and not about legal ones, for, the legal ones impose the responsibility .
We are fighting for gaining few guns to protect us and your likes are singing about gun control, you should have been in Taj mumbai to realize the worth of what you are proposing here.
Its a shame we have people who would like to move mountains without having full picture of the scenario.
If you are proposing gun control then please do it for your state only and mention that "its applicable to Manipur only", few people have quoted your article on some sites stating that India is heavily armed and its very dangerous to be there.
Please use discretion while writing things on the net.
Regards
Subs
Sir,
It is very sorry to note that uneducated fools are spreading rumours yet again.
The large quantity of arms that is available in India are all unauthorised . 90 % of the arms in India are illegal.
A person with an authorised firearm will NOT indulge in illegal activities.
A person with a firearm permit is a law abiding citizen.
Please do not spread wrong information if you do not know anything about it.
Thank you
/S/
Think about this:
a. The number of physicians in the US is 700,000.
b. Accidental deaths caused by Physicians per year is 120,000.
c. Accidental deaths per physician is 0.171. (US Dept. of Health & Human Services)
Then think about this:
a. The number of gun owners in the US is 80,000,000.
b. The number of accidental gun deaths per year (all age groups) is 1,500.
c. The number of accidental deaths per gun owner is .0000188.
Statistically, doctors are approximately 9,000 times more dangerous than gun owners.
FACT: NOT EVERYONE HAS A GUN, BUT ALMOST EVERYONE HAS AT LEAST ONE DOCTOR.
Please alert your friends to this alarming threat. We must ban doctors before this gets out of hand. As a public health measure I have withheld the statistics on lawyers for fear that the shock could cause people to seek medical attention
Without ammunition, a gun is just an expensive club. Ammunition has a distinctive odour, so sniffer dogs can identify it if is in the vicinity. Therefore, the best way of controlling gun violence is to control the amount of ammunition available, and invest in sniffer dogs.
The article starts with a noble intention and then swiftly and tactlessly wanders completely off the point.It starts with the illegal gun running in the North-East and ends up prescribing restrictions imposed on legal gun owners whose only intention is protection of life and property,two of the most basic human rights.Pray M Napram explain how disarming law abiding citizens and depriving them of a right to protect themselves helps bring in peace?The drug pedlars or terrorists or dacoits do not apply for arms licenses to kill people.They get them whether you legally allow them or not.By depriving legal gun ownership, you are defeating the very cause you have taken up upon yourself.
I want to ask you one question, when the terrorists in Punjab and Kashmir were killing people with guns procured illegally, what was the State doing or what were oraganisations like yours doing?There were umpteen verifiable instances where as normal law abiding people, women,elderly and juveniles included, fought off terrorists with licensed guns or guns given by the government. When a killer comes to harm my family or my friends or an unknown person that I come across, I want something in my hand to protect them, not die simpering and praying .
There is not a single word in your entire paper about preventing illegal guns,which are the major cause of violent crimes in India.Instead very blithely you embark upon prescribing measures to restrict legal gun ownership.I fail to see the connection nor logic and much less commonsense.
I greatly appreciate your reply to my concerns.
We all want to stop illegal gun ownership and criminals procuring guns.But, not legal gun ownership.
This is typical disjointed hemorrhaging-heart drivel that comes from individuals and 'institutions' opposed to legal ownership of guns. I and almost any person more knowledgeble than furniture, find it amusing that your type somewhat consistently find a connection with a Defense-Expo and legal civilian gun ownership. Defense expos, mostly, are an exposition of military arms and equipment... mostly Aircraft, Missiles, Tanks, Ships...etc. Those 450 or so companies were not here to to do what you think, or are trying to imply. Their sole purpose was and is simply to peddle their hardware to the Government to India... I don't see the connection with miserable private gun owner in India.
Please define : " India, my country, is the second
most heavily armed nation in the world, and the majority of an estimated 40
million firearms are in civilian possession."
- In relation to the above quote, have you made any effort to distinguish between the defense/law-enforcement forces and civilain gun owners? Or are you lumping the two as one and the same just to support the banal and false stastics? One could accuse you and your ilk of providing false information to the less knowledgable public.
By "heavily armed nation", if you are referring to our Security forces, then it certainly holds water.... but how is that connected to legal private gun owners?
Are you aware that the Indian Arms Act is one of the most restrictive in the world - here I'm not providing false information- I said "one of the most" and not "the most".
I too, am from NE India, and I know, the ground situation. I also understand the tragedy of Manipur.
Its easy for you to again lump together arms used by militants/terrorists and civilians - Its typical.
Have you ever seen a militant dutifully line up at the local DC's office to apply for a Form III arms license?...or maybe even the mandatory police verification of the applicant's antecedents and address? - We, the miserable civilain gun owners/enthusiasts have to.
What next after you take away our shaky 'right' to bear legal guns? Maybe you'd be happy to know that the only gun owners would be militants and terrorists and criminals.... that is, if one chooses to disregard the Security forces as "gun-owners" or "gun-bearing parties".
If Im talking of my natural god-given right to defense of self and property (Whatever way some of our ridiculuous laws view it), well, why shouldn't I be legally armed? India has one of the most corrupt and ineffectual police in the world... there's no way they can play cavalry if any such crisis befell me and my loved ones. Will they be there in the 3 seconds that it takes for a militant to empty his AK-47 magazine? Are you insinuating that one should simply wait for the police to come and all will be well? Or maybe that dangerous apple-peeler in the kitchen would suffice as a defense tool.
What if the tragically unfortunate Buddhi Moirangthem or a nearby family loved one had the means to defend himself? Would that be unfashionable with these liberal times and ideas?... or simply overlooked as an abberation to CAFI's ridiculuous statistics?
Are you also aware that if one states "Self-Defense" as the reason for application of an Arms License, the odds are your application will be rejected? Where is the logic in that? Even so, many gun owners are not even interested in self defense... many like me, simply want to own a gun for sport or a lazy sunday afternoon of shooting tin cans at a safe place. I don't view that as a crime against humanity or an agent of bloodletting in our nations streets and homes.
...speaking of guns and sport, perhaps it's annoying to you and other anti-guns that of late, India seems to be bringing in olympic medals only in shooting and martial sports like boxing and wrestling... goodness the violence...how boorish of us Indians!
To be objective, certainly, legaly owned arms have been used or rather misued in crime and wrong doing. But again do bear in mind that its a very - and I mean very, small, visible minority. Its this minority that is equated with all civilian gun owners the world over. India, with its new found breed of post-modern busy-body activists is no exception.
And what of Licensed Gun-Dealers?... certainly a few are rapacious and unprincipled but most are simply making a living - and legally, if I might so add.
As for the comment "Gun shops are
mushrooming in the state of Uttar Pradesh like public telephone booths" - So now idiomatic exaggeration and hear-say is regarded as effective statistical data? In any case, so what if there are many dealers? Are they the force behind terrorists militants and psychopaths? It's almost that you'd like all to believe so.
Why can't you and your type simply understand the need. And the need is to control illegal arms not legal arms.
Should any major incident take place, our rather stupid bureaucracy, so generalist,mediocre and smug, will quite predictably target us legal gunowners with more restrictions... like that will have any effect on militants and criminals. But the stupid, inept and incredibly naive government functionaries must be 'seen' to be taking some definite action after every incident. We- the legal Indian Gun Owners are the soft target every time.
Speaking of regulations and bans... are you aware that since 1986 there has been a more or less complete ban on import of civilian fire-arms by the Ministry of Finance (not even the Ministry of Home)... this was the Finance ministry's grand response to terrorism in Punjab...the silly bureaucrats and their masters actually thought it would work... a decade later, it eventually took among other things, drastic and sustained armed action by the security forces including arming of vulnerable civilian communities by the government, to bring Punjab Terrorism to a practical end. To date there is no verifiable record of a Punjab militant applying for import license of a firearm from the relevant ministry.
...the hairbrained ban remains.
So, please be merciful and leave us miserable Indian gun owners alone. We have enough problems with and inept, arrogant and corrupt bureaucracy lording over our very modest 'right' to bear legal arms.
Your energies on the topic of gun control are misplaced and mis-directed. What you should be actually be concentrating upon is the illegal gun manufacturing that is rampant in many states (even as a household industry in many) and definitely enjoying political patronage.
We have the most restrictive gun laws in force, but for whom - the legal gun owners. Do you guys ever talk of the criminals and dacoits who are armed to the teeth with Prohibited Bore weapons that even ordinary civilians cannot possess ? Where do you think they get their arms and ammunition from - the DM's office ??
Misuse of legally owned guns is a minuscule in comparison with the illegal weaponry flowing all around. The crime rate comparison of gun violence has already been mentioned by a fellow commentator.
Post new comment