Quote of the day

Democracy is how life is lived

Syndicate content

Embed this article

Want this article on your site? Check our licensing policy and Copy this code into your HTML

Navigation


View 2 comments

Pervez Musharraf’s desperate gamble

The Pakistani president's martial-law decree is targeting lawyers, human-rights activists, political opponents and the media. Can it work? Irfan Husain, in Karachi, reports.


Pervez Musharraf's second coup, or "emergency plus" as it is being referred to in the Pakistani media, was widely expected by the time it was finally announced on the afternoon of 3 November 2007. Musharraf's limited options mean that it is being seen here as the last roll of the dice by a desperate gambler.

In his midnight address to the nation on state TV, Musharraf came across as nervous and hesitant, far from the image of the straight-talking commando he has successfully maintained over his last eight years as the leader of Pakistan. A significant moment came when, switching from Urdu to English, he appealed for understanding and patience from the international community. This, and his quoting of Abraham Lincoln to justify his suspension of the constitution, made plain that his message was intended for Washington.

For the moment, if anybody can influence Musharraf, it is George W Bush, the Pakistani dictator's biggest supporter in the west. Since 9/11, the United States has pumped $10 billion into Pakistan, most of the money going straight to the military. Despite this largesse, many Americans are dissatisfied with the Pakistani army's performance in the field against the Taliban, and their tribal hosts and allies along the turbulent border with Afghanistan. There are thus many in the Democrat-controlled Congress who would like to see a suspension of aid to Pakistan until Musharraf restores democracy.

Irfan Husain is a columnist with Dawn newspaper in Pakistan. Among Irfan Husain's articles in openDemocracy:

"Musharraf's own goals" (27 March 2006)

"The state of Pakistan" (22 May 2006)

"The Baluchi insurrection" (4 September 2006)

"How democracy works in Pakistan" (29 September 2006)

"Pervez Musharraf: in a vice" (6 November 2006)

"Pakistan: zero-sum games people play" (6 December 2006)

"Pervez Musharraf's bed of nails" (29 April 2007)

"Pakistan: the enemy within" (30 July 2007)

"Pakistan's poker-game" (14 September 2007)

However, the Pentagon is more pragmatic: in a Los Angeles Times story of 4 November 2007, an unnamed Pentagon official is quoted as saying that "the problem is we have a war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan is a coalition partner... We have troops on the ground in Afghanistan, and it's hard to have a good outcome if Pakistan is not cooperating." The report goes on to quote Paul Pillar, a former CIA counter-terrorism official, as saying that the United States is likely to continue to "scold Musharraf but not impose significant sanctions" (see Greg Miller, "U.S. unlikely to halt Pakistan aid", 4 November 2007).

And this, for now, is the bottom line. Without American pressure, Musharraf is likely to continue his crackdown. Within the first twenty-four hours of his emergency rule, the police arrested over a thousand lawyers, journalists and political activists across the country. The leading human-rights lawyer and United Nations rapporteur Asma Jahangir has been placed under detention for three months, together with the secretary-general of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) and well-known journalist IA Rehman.

Around seventy human-rights activists were detained when they gathered at the HRCP office in Lahore for a protest meeting. When asked to sign an affidavit that they would not indulge in "anti-state" activities again, they all refused and spent the night in jail.

The real target

Meanwhile, back in the mountains where Pakistan's real problems lie, the stand-off with the militants continues. Musharraf named the rising tide of jihadi militancy as one of the reasons for the imposition of martial law. But he did not elaborate on how this would give him more powers: as army chief and head of state, there had been nothing to stop him from acting against the militants who have virtually taken over large swathes of the country.

In Swat, until recently a stunningly beautiful, peaceful and relatively prosperous valley in the northwest of Pakistan, the militants have carried out a series of violent acts. These include blowing up a large rock carving of the Buddha; attacking video shops; and beheading several paramilitary troops in public. Led by Mullah Fazlullah, a 28-year old cleric who is also known as "Mullah Radio" for his hate-filled FM broadcasts, the movement has caused thousands of locals to flee the valley.

Also in openDemocracy on Pakistan under Pervez Musharraf:

Maruf Khwaja, "The Islamisation of Pakistan" (12 April 2006)

Iftikhar H Malik, "Musharraf's predicament, Pakistan's agony" (5 September 2006)

Shaun Gregory, "Pakistan on edge" (25 September 2006)

Ehsan Masood, "Pakistan: the army as the state" (12 April 2007)

Ayesha Siddiqa, "Pakistan's permanent crisis" (16 May 2007)

Paul Rogers, "Pakistan signals red" (5 July 2007 )

Paul Rogers, "Pakistan's peril" (19 July 2007)

Maruf Khwaja, "The war for Pakistan" (24 July 2007)

Shaun Gregory, "Pakistan: farewell to democracy" (29 October 2007)
For the last two years, Musharraf and his government have stood by silently while the militants tightened their hold over Swat. People are asking what he can do now to dislodge them that he could not have done earlier.

It is clear that for the time being, no street movement will gather enough momentum to topple Musharraf. The only party that could conceivably cause a problem in the short run is Benazir Bhutto's Pakistan People's Party. But given her tacit understanding with Musharraf, as well as her reluctance to upset Washington, it is unlikely that Bhutto will launch a street movement. For the time being, she will limit herself to verbal denunciations of the crackdown, while restraining her party workers.

It is notable that Musharraf has targeted the community that has caused him his biggest headache - and threatened to do so again: the legal profession. Musharraf had a number of senior lawyers arrested on 3 November, to crush any possible revival of the kind of movement lawyers had launched to reinstate the chief justice of the supreme court, Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, following his suspension on 9 March 2007. At the head of the list is Aitzaz Ahsan, the barrister who defended the chief justice and who led the lawyers' movement. The police have also cracked down heavily on the legal fraternity across the country. Lawyers protesting in the Lahore high court were savagely beaten, and dozens arrested. The police broke in to Karachi's Sindh high court, and dragged off over fifty lawyers to jail.

The general in his labyrinth

Indeed, the targeting of Pakistan's legal profession is a key to the crisis and to Musharraf's strategy. In essence, the extraordinary step Musharraf has taken was aimed at pre-empting the supreme-court decision on his right to contest the presidential elections held on 6 October 2007. For days, rumours had been circulating that the court was going to declare Musharraf's re-election illegal, precipitating a constitutional crisis. In the event, he has effectively cleansed the higher judiciary of all judges who might question his rule.

The tactic used was to issue a "provisional constitutional order", and asking selected judges to take a fresh oath on it. A large number of supreme-court and high-court judges refused to do so, and have thus been removed from their respective benches.

Since he enacted his emergency, all the private TV news channels, including foreign ones like the BBC, al-Jazeera and CNN, have been off the air. Sweeping rules to muzzle the electronic and print media have been announced. Musharraf must have taken note of the fact that during the lawyers' movement, private TV channels had been instrumental in rallying support for the cause. This time around, Musharraf does not want his actions questioned live by panellists on TV. In a country with a 50% literacy rate, radio and TV have far more reach and influence than do the country's feisty newspapers.

So for the time being, Pervez Musharraf appears to have pulled off his coup with relatively little opposition. But the problems he has created for himself are unlikely to go away. The prime minister Shaukat Aziz has said that the new dispensation will last for as long as necessary; attorney-general Malik Abdul Qayyum suggests that elections may yet take place by mid-January 2008. In any event, democracy seems no part of Musharraf's plans. Meanwhile, rising prices, increasing militancy and growing international pressure might be more effective in forcing Musharraf to restore normalcy than internal political opposition.

Average rating
(3 votes)

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.opendemocracy.net/trackback/35020
read on

Ian Talbot, Pakistan: A Modern History (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005)

 
This article is published by Irfan Husain, , and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.

vijayaraghavan.p said:



Tue, 2007-11-06 13:52
It is my perception that many in Pakistan have forgotten that it was Gen. Musharraf who had prevented Pakistan from sliding into chaos, especially when Taliban was at its peak soon after 9/11/2001. The legal fraternity especially should have given credit to whatever he has done instead of denouncing him as evil-personified. If Gen. Musharraf continues with the same sagacity with which he has handled difficult situations so far, he is likely to meet with success in future also. P.Vijayaraghavan
login or register to post comments | email this comment

Ilyas khan Baloch said:



Wed, 2008-02-20 22:55

Sir/Madam,
Dare to raise your voice for the voiceless people of Pakistan, help to empower the Pakistani - the country belongs too.
Pakistan is passing through a crucial time and is in imminent need for change of system, instead of change of faces, let the people of Pakistan the country belongs to be the real stack holder and empower them to decide the fate of their generation.
Since the creation of Pakistan the Pakistani people are left at distant from the corridor of power so that the ruling elite can do what they wanted to do in favour of their interest, leaving the Pakistani people at the mercy of circumstances. As this policy is denial of right of Pakistani people to rule their country according to their aspiration and desire to built this country, which can provide equal opportunity to all without any discrimination for the establishment of welfare society. Only the society base on tolerance, equality and justice can be the real guarantee for the prosperous and strong Pakistan there for your intention is invited to the crucial movement which could be the point of distraction or disaster.
since last 60 years no one has dare to trust the Pakistani people and involved them in to the day to day decision making process with intention to develop a sense of participation in to the decision making process affecting the future of their country and their generation at large and share the real benefit of democracy, and due to the conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits, deprivation and opinions of the masses as an important element within so-called democratic society, they manipulate this elements of society to constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
As we are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes are formed, our ideas suggested largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of masses beings force to cooperate in this approach if they are to live together as a so-called smoothly functioning society.
Whatever attitude, one chooses to take toward this condition, it remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons, who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and engineer new ways to bind and protect their personal interest with outside forces.
Sometimes the effect on the public is created by a professional propagandist, sometimes by an amateur deputed for the situation. The important thing is that it is universal and continuous; and in its sum total is regimenting the public mind every bit as much as possible to keep the masses away from the corridor of power. The systematic study of mass psychology, revealed to the ruling click the potentialities of (invisible groups within the society) manipulation of the society by actuate man, So the question naturally arose, If we understand the mechanism and motives of the ruling elite and the way they practice, propaganda has proved that it is possible, at least up to a certain extent and within certain limits we can introduce the alternate socio-political system to replace the present undemocratic system.
No one believes any longer that the voice of the people expresses could have been stop, any divine or especially wise and lofty idea. The honest voice of the people, regarding the system will affect the mind of the people, and that mind once made up for it by the masses, group taking responsibility for the change of system will succeed in creating public opinion.
Whether is the difficulty of getting elected to office or in the problem of interpreting and popularizing new issues, or in the problem of making the day-to-day administration of public relation affecting a vital part of the community life should be carefully adjusted according to the mentality of the masses, being an essential attachment of political life.
We have already lost the major part of Pakistan in 1971 simply to save the centralised sole power to exploit this country by the ruling elite they let the country break in part then allowing the masses to rule this country democratically. In the present circumstances we are again dragging our sovereignty at stack for the external interest in the name of national interest, instead of our interest i.e. the interest of Pakistani people at large.
The only way out of these crucial circumstances is the only way to empower the common Pakistani at grass route level i.e. the change of system. This change is inevitable for the prosperous Pakistan .As a citizen of this country I have try to provide an alternate socio-political system to empower the masses at grass route level for rapid industrial and agriculture development with transparency and accountability in the system. Along with basic guarantees for the creation of welfare state, where in public representative and institution shall be answerable and accountable to the masses.

Kindly see web site….www.idp.org.pk
Kindly acknowledge with your comments.
Ilyas khan Baloch
Organizer Islamic Democratic Party

login or register to post comments | email this comment