Part of the openDemocracy Network

What the Economists are Blogging

A Netvibes page with all the blog feeds you need to know what they're writing about the crisis

Syndicate content

Economics in depth series

The Liberty of the Networked, Tony Curzon Price

Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3

Navigation

Login

Login or Register to be identified in your comments

Email & RSS

Sign up to oD's editorial summaries email:


Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz


Follow oD on Twitter:


Join our Facebook group:
Add oD to your Netvibes: Add to Netvibes

Demotix witness*upload*share

Embed this article

Want this article on your site? Check our licensing policy and Copy this code into your HTML

Columns

Paul Rogers

Global security


Li Datong

China from the inside


Fred Halliday

Global politics


Mary Kaldor

Human security


Daniele Archibugi

Cosmopolitan democracy

Signpost Blog

delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Syndicate content

Balance: thinly spread and unpopular

30 - 03 - 2009
delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

March 30th 2009. Join the Group Read. Chapter 18. A first balance

(Instructions on how to join are at the bottom of the original post)

This is the first chapter attempting to balance-up consumption and production. While the story told so far of the raw energy potential from renewable sources shows an ecouragingly close race to maintain our rich lifestyles with sustainable energy sources, a little digging provides much disappointment. Between the potential and the realisation lies a factor of over 100! From a production potential of 180 kWh per day per person, we get to an actual production figure of just 1 kwh/d/p and a "realisable" estimate of 18 kwh/d/p---a full ten times less than our consumption.

Looking at the heart of the physics problem, David MacKay points to the geographically diffuse nature of renewables: each person needs a huge amount of land, tidal exposure, wind per person to make the sums add up. The sustainable potentials, as David emphasises, need "country-sized solutions". "To get a big contribu- tion from wind, we used wind farms with the area of Wales. To get a big contribution from solar photovoltaics, we required half the area of Wales. To get a big contribution from waves, we imagined wave farms covering 500 km of coastline. To make energy crops with a big contribution, we took 75% of the whole country."

Yet protection of species, habitats, nature, beauty etc. all move the same people who want to reduce fossil fuel dependency to limit the installations. Something will need to give to balance our energy ...

Average rating
(0 votes)
 
This article is published by Tony Curzon Price, and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it without needing further permission, with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. These rules apply to one-off or infrequent use. For all re-print, syndication and educational use please see read our republishing guidelines or contact us. Some articles on this site are published under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless specifically licensed under Creative Commons.
This article adheres to the openDemocracy.net principles.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Henk Daalder Windpark Wiki (not verified) said:

Sun, 2009-08-09 13:57

This book is created with the sole purpose to prevent the UK to implement wind power.
To have you accept dangerous and costly nuclear power plants.
And dismiss that wind power actually is free energy, as long as the wind park is maintained.

Wind parks are the most cost efficient way to generate sustainable power, without the obligation to pay for CO2 pollution.
A single turbine of 3 MW and 100 m high, will power a community of 8000 inhabitants.
So citizens of the UK will live on sustainable energy with about 8000 of these turbines
When designed in long lines, from south to north, this would mean such a line every 30 to 100 km for densely populated areas and less populated areas.
Of course these lines will be designed with landscape design rules in mind.

And this way of generating your own energy, with your own piece of a wind turbine, will reduce costs of energy by a factor of 3, and will make this cost stable for the coming 20 years.

Coal and gas powered electricity produces CO2.
Nuclear power produces almost just as much CO2 as a gas fired power plant.
And their price will increase every year.

Just be wise and choose to become a member of a wind park building community.
Don't believe the lies of the fossil industry in their struggle of death.
Just make your own calculations, and verify my figures and proposal.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img> <map>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options