Part of the openDemocracy Network

What the Economists are Blogging

A Netvibes page with all the blog feeds you need to know what they're writing about the crisis

Syndicate content

Economics in depth series

The Liberty of the Networked, Tony Curzon Price

Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3

Navigation

Login

Login or Register to be identified in your comments

Email & RSS

Sign up to oD's editorial summaries email:


Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz


Follow oD on Twitter:


Join our Facebook group:
Add oD to your Netvibes: Add to Netvibes

Demotix witness*upload*share

Embed this article

Want this article on your site? Check our licensing policy and Copy this code into your HTML

Columns

Paul Rogers

Global security


Li Datong

China from the inside


Fred Halliday

Global politics


Mary Kaldor

Human security


Daniele Archibugi

Cosmopolitan democracy

Signpost Blog

delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Syndicate content

Transport: Bicycles, trains, electric cars and nuclear ships

4 - 05 - 2009
delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

May 4th 2009. Join the Group Read. Chapter 20. Transport

(Instructions on how to join are at the bottom of the original post)



Electrify transport. There's not much to beat trains+bicycles, and any government looking for a Keynesian stimulus should find lots of infrastructure opportunities here.(For the UK, reverse Beeching at last))

David MacKay comes down softly on the car---which shows great realism---and finds that electrification is the only real solution there. He debunks hydrogen as a good energy carrier. Flying is a really tough case---there is not much that can be done to reduce its energy intensity. (I was sitting in an easyjet plane the other day that tried to convince me of its greenery by saying: "Flying contributes less CO2 than driving to the atmosphere" ...). Batteries are the way to go---though just wait for the peak lithium scares.

David has an interesting aside on nuclear ships. If we could make the (political) world safe for small-scale nuclear power, maybe there's more than ships that could benefit.

Average rating
(0 votes)
 
This article is published by Tony Curzon Price, and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it without needing further permission, with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. These rules apply to one-off or infrequent use. For all re-print, syndication and educational use please see read our republishing guidelines or contact us. Some articles on this site are published under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless specifically licensed under Creative Commons.
This article adheres to the openDemocracy.net principles.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Tony Curzon Price said:

Tue, 2009-05-05 10:33

Daniel - it's worth reading David on the detail here. Quoting his conclusion: "Planes have already been fantastically optimized, and there is no prospect of significant improvements in plane efficiency."

tony

DanielThompson said:

Mon, 2009-05-04 20:15

Electric car seem to be the best concept thus far. But there never seems to be much emphasis on the electric car. As for planes i think they should look at more fuel efficient engines and look to make the structure of the plane lighter.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img> <map>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options