About Susan Richards

Susan Richards is a non-executive director and founder of openDemocracy.

She has produced a number of feature films and written a prize-winning book, Epics of Everyday Life, about the lives of ordinary Russians in the transition from communism. Lost & Found in Russia, Encounters in the Deep Heartland, which covers the period 1992-2008, was published by IB Tauris in May 2009.

Articles by Susan Richards

The motivation of the Boston Bombers

The background of the Tsarnaev family must provide some clues to the Boston bombing.

Has Russia abandoned Dagestan?

Police corruption has reached epic levels in the Russian republic of Dagestan. The men in charge with tackling the issue felt they had no option but to go public, but their actions have been met with a deafening silence from Moscow, says Susan Richards

A good infection – remembering Bookaid

Against the backdrop of Soviet disintegration, a grassroots campaign was launched from Britain to send hundreds of thousands of books to libraries across Russia and its ex-colonies. As Bookaid celebrates its twentieth anniversary, two of its organisers, Susan Richards and Ekaterina Genieva, consider a venture that still has resonance today – the struggle to establish civil society across the territory of the old Soviet empire. 

On the eve of collapse: encounters in a changing Russia

Next week marks the twentieth anniversary of the August 1991 coup attempt. While this proved a dramatic final nail in the Soviet coffin, many more fundamental changes — the breaking down of information walls and the dissipation of fear — occurred in the months and years leading up to then. Susan Richards, oD Russia’s founder editor, spent much of this time traveling around Russia, talking to ordinary Russians about their lives. We reproduce two accounts here.

An improbable team

It took an unlikely combination of talents to start building openDemocracy’s Tower of Babel, comments one of its founders

Russia's security services: back in charge, out of control

Russia’s security apparatus is back in charge — as powerful, and with less holding it back than ever before. Susan Richards reflects on Wikileaks and reviews a fascinating account of Russia's unofficial second state

Tolstoy: a life too large

What else could possibly be written about Tolstoy? Before reading Rosamund Bartlett’s new biography, Susan Richards did wonder. But the fall of Soviet power has revealed material which allows us to appreciate how vividly his legacy has lived on and how relevant it remains today

Liberating Pushkin

Russia’s greatest poet Alexander Pushkin is notoriously hard for non-Russian speakers to appreciate. So Susan Richards welcomes a concise new biography of the poet by his translator Robert Chandler which strips the varnish off

Russia's drugs problem: blame the West

Why is Russia resisting international help with its spiralling drugs problem, asks Susan Richards? While the Kremlin's rhetoric reveals a profound insecurity, its policies are failing to deal effectively with the situation

Lost and Found in Russia III: My Dream House

2004 Crimea, Sevastopol.

Over the years I had sent letters and messages to Novosibirsk, but there had been no response. They had vanished without trace. I found them through Anna. She had received an email from Igor out of the blue, with some information he thought would interest her. ‘And did it?' ‘Huh!'

The couple were somewhere in Crimea now, on the Black Sea. I had invited myself to stay with them. The departure hall of Moscow airport was full of Russians who seemed to consider it normal to be going abroad with the family on holiday. They were leafing through glossy Russian magazines entitled Limousine and Property Today and their children were wearing brand new tracksuits and listening to I-pods. But these beneficiaries of Moscow's boomtime were not rich. They worked as bookkeepers, chauffeurs and chefs. Crimea was cheap and did not really count as ‘abroad'. Indeed, it had been part of Russia until 1954, when Khrushchev, in a quixotic gesture, bequeathed it to Ukraine, his native land. Until the Soviet Union broke up that had not made much difference to Russia. But now it was a phantom limb: it felt like part of Russia, though it was not.

On the flight I tried to imagine what had become of Natasha and Igor. Would they have joined the thrusting new economy of my fellow passengers? When we last met in Siberia, the couple had come through many an ordeal and equipped themselves with business skills. I tried to imagine them living a prosperous, middle-class life by the sea, but this seemed unlikely. The forces shaping their lives were stormy and unpredictable, and this move suggested that Natasha was still running away from her past, from the mother who haunted her dreams.

Natasha was there to meet me at Simferopol airport. Her snub-nosed Slav face under that thick mop of curls was burnished by sun, and her eyes were sparkling. She was jumping up and down with excitement. By her side was a smartly dressed younger man who walked with a bad limp. Hmm, so she had finally left Igor. ‘Oh no, it's not what you think!' she said quickly: ‘Meet our dearest friend and colleague - Volodya, hero of the Afghan War.'

As Volodya drove south out of Simferopol, Natasha told me his story. A much-decorated young colonel, he had been brought here straight off the battlefield in Afghanistan, almost dead from his wounds. By the time his convalescence was over, Crimea had become home. The community of retired Russian servicemen was large, for Russia's navy was still based here. After the Soviet Union fell apart, the government struck a deal with Ukraine that until 2017 they would go on renting the facilities of the naval base.

The low rolling hills over which we were driving were so dense with colour that we might have been in a landscape by Derain, or the young Kandinsky: purple fields of lavender, vastly overgrown, gave way to golden slopes of wheat, ripe for harvesting, then to ropes of green vines stretching out of sight. The usual litter of rusting frames and posts, half-built concrete sheds and fencing could not mar the improbable beauty of the place.

Once, said Volodya, the wine was good and the trade in lavender oil lucrative. But the collective farms that had kept the Soviet naval bases supplied had fallen apart. The soil was so rich it produced three harvests a year. The food kept growing, but there was little market for it now. By the roadside men and women were selling tomatoes, raspberries, cherries and strawberries, and vegetables, ridiculously cheap.

Natasha was talking about the politics of Sevastopol and some project that she and Igor were doing with Volodya. As she talked, something fell into place: the same instinct for trouble which led the couple to move across Russia into the eye of a political storm in Marx was surely at work again in their move down here. For Crimea, fought over for centuries, was today locked in a battle invisible to the outside world. It had become Ukraine's Hong Kong: Russia's empire might have fallen, but the Russians were still here, and their navy too.

Such was the political impasse between Ukraine and Russia that no one was in charge. ‘We live in the present, a present that's stuck in the past. You can't get anything done - not even buy a train ticket, let alone get a phone line or a passport. Not unless you know someone, or have money to bribe them. There are Afghan war heroes who've been waiting twelve years for a phone line! It was really hard when we came here - we couldn't find work at all. And if we hadn't met Volodya we'd never have managed.'

When the sea came in sight Volodya turned down a track and threaded his way between plots of land lush with flowers and fruit trees. In each, a little house had been cobbled together out of scavenged bits and pieces. The car pulled up in front of a couple of concrete huts with tin roofs, standing in a maze of weeds. Behind the fence, two dogs leaped around, barking in delight. Igor was standing, as upright in his bearing as ever, beaming at us. He was tanned and handsome. The moustaches which still curved down on either side of his mouth were still black and elegantly trimmed. But his hair was white now, and his front teeth were gone.

We sat and drank fruit juice in the shade of a terrace improvised out of army camouflage. After Volodya left, I looked inside the hut. It was simply furnished. To my surprise there was hardly a book to be seen. On Igor's immaculately tidy desk there was a computer, and even an Internet connection. Thanks to Volodya, Igor said with a grin, they were producing a newspaper again - and they called it The Messenger, like the last one. This time they were distributing it free.

‘As you can see, they've gone, the possessions. It seems we had to lose everything. One more time. We had to learn how to live all over again. The dogs taught us to get up at dawn and go to bed when it got dark. At one point we even had to sell our books - even the English ones. Just to stay alive. We lived on buckwheat porridge for a month. It's funny - food was always something I'd taken for granted. Then we understood how little you need to live on. And how good it made us feel. So light and free!' Natasha's words spurted out like uncorked champagne.

‘If we'd stayed on in Novosibirsk we'd never have learned these things. Life was too easy. Yes, we were earning good money. We were living in this nice flat. We had everything a person could want. But there was nothing to do - nothing but drink kefir and listen to the air conditioning. Besides, it wasn't really honest, the money we were making there. Do you remember? Igor thought up this brilliant wheeze for advertising the houses the company was building. We set up this competition for children to draw My Dream House. We used the winners in our ad campaign. The paintings were wonderful. But it wasn't honest - it looked as if the company was really going to build those dream houses. Which couldn't have been further from the truth!

I was sleeping in a hut across the yard from theirs. As I went to bed I noticed an unopened crate of vodka bottles stashed under a table in the corner of the room. So Natasha was still drinking. How come she was looking so happy, so healthy, then? How come they were publishing The Messenger, but giving it away. How were they earning any money? Nothing quite added up.

However, I had cleared up an old mystery. Over supper I asked Igor and Natasha about those rumours running round Novosibirsk when I last visited them. Rumours of a leak at the plutonium factory near their flat. Were they right? Yes, it was a bad leak, they said. Natasha, who was marinated in alcohol, was unaffected. But Igor, who did not drink, suffered badly. His teeth fell out soon after my visit.

After I turned the light off the sound of digging started up, quite close by, in the next door garden. Now and then a torch flashed. On and on the digging went. What could they be doing, I wondered as I drifted off to sleep?

--------------------------------

„Lost and Found in Russia" at openDemocracy Russia.

Other excerpts from Susan Richards's book can be found at:

Building Heaven or Hell

This second excerpt from Susan Richards' book Lost and Found in Russia follows the same characters, Natasha and Igor, to Siberia four years later, in 1997. What is it in Natasha's past that haunts her, pursuing her across Russia? A very odd clue emerges. 

http://www.opendemocracy.net/russia/article/lost-and-found-in-russia-2-building-heaven-or-hell

A visit to Marx

The first of three excerpts from a new book by openDemocracy Russia editor Susan Richards. Lost and Found in Russia tells the story of post-communist years through the lives of a group of idealistic young people in the heartland.

http://www.opendemocracy.net/russia/article/lost-and-found-in-russia-a-visit-to-marx

--------------------------------

New book by openDemocracy Russia editor Susan Richards

‘A brilliant, poignant evocation of a society in transition.'  Robert Service

‘Sheds a uniquely intimate light behind the facade of the new Russia.'Colin Thubron

‘A uniquely personal chronicle, and a testament to friendship.' Victoria Glendinning

‘Tells us more about the lethal tides of recent Russian history than years of newspaper reports.'   Philip Marsden

Lost and Found in Russia 2: Building Heaven or Hell

1997 Novosibirsk, Siberia

Ed: Before the fall of communism, Natasha and Igor were drawn to the Volga town of Marx by the expectation that once Russia's Germans were granted their homeland, a new and prosperous microcosm of Russia would arise there (cf first excerpt). When that did not happen, they were stuck in Marx, unable to sell their house. Only in 1995 did they finally manage to swap their house for a flat in the nearby city of Saratov.

Selling the Saratov flat proved extremely dangerous in the criminalised, unregulated early days of privatisation. They were comforted by the prospect of moving back to Natasha's birthplace, Novosibirsk, where Natasha's father was a big boss. But that move did not resolve their problems either. They spent their first Siberian winter in some cellar, a refuge for winos and prostitutes. For all their education, they also lacked the skills to find work in the new Russia.

Natasha's father was holding a birthday party. I had heard a lot about him over the years: the charmer, the great builder, member of Novosibirsk's old Party elite. She never mentioned her mother, and something about her silence deterred questions. It was her father who brought her up, and she spoke of him with love and pride. She was clearly his darling. But I still had no idea why she fled from him, and from all the privileges that came with that background. In Russia, it was far riskier to throw away such advantages than in the West. What made her leave her first happy marriage, to rush hither and thither across Russia, from one husband to the next, only to end up back home in a basement with winos and drop-outs?

Natasha's father and step-mother lived in a flat in the city centre. We travelled in on the tram. Despite their penury, Natasha and Igor were smartly dressed in clothes from a shop which imported second-hand clothes from the West.

The front door was opened by a vivacious, nut-brown man with a vigorous mane of curls, the spitting-image of his daughter. Gallantly, he kissed my hand. The flat was light and airy, but perfectly modest. Had Natasha's father's savings gone in the inflation of those first post-communist years, I wondered? Or was the opulence of Natasha's childhood, which she recalled so vividly, only relative?

Despite the cancer that had struck his vocal chords, her father seated me beside him and regaled me through the long summer evening with whispered jokes and stories. But his efforts and his gallantry could not disguise the sadness which hung over the occasion. His much younger wife, a broad-hipped doll with a round, painted face, produced a sumptuous birthday meal. She hardly spoke all evening, but her face wore a martyred smile. ‘What about me?' it seemed to say. Even as she netted her big boss, he had turned into a sick old man.

Natasha fussed around her father and me like a nanny. She was nervous, and it was no wonder. For while we were changing for the party she dropped a bomb into our conversation: her father had spent his life building those arms factories which dominated the city's skyline. ‘One made nuclear weapons,' she said in a horrified whisper, holding my gaze in the miniature mirror in which she was making up her eyes.

‘My sister and I grew up knowing nothing - we thought he just built houses.' In fact, of course, most of the city's economy, and 40 per cent of the Soviet empire's was military. ‘It wasn't Papa who told me, but Sasha.' He was her first husband. ‘He didn't want to. He knew what it would do to me - I bullied him into it.' She turned round and looked at me directly. ‘I adored Papa so much. He'd been my idol - I felt betrayed. I couldn't forgive him. He belonged to that world - he knew all about it and he never told us, never prepared us. How I used to laugh when people used to talk about psychotronic weapons! I thought it was pure paranoia! They counted on that, on us thinking it was too far fetched! But when I asked him about them recently, he said he "knew the factories well!"' Before I could ask her any more, Igor interrupted us, hurrying us off to the party. In the tram coming in Natasha would not look at me, but stood gazing out of the window, frighteningly pale and still.

Natasha's anxiety rubbed off on her father. Even now it was clear how close the two were. When everyone else was in the kitchen fetching food, he whispered hoarsely in my ear, out of the blue, as if he knew what his daughter had been telling me: ‘It wasn't right what we did.' At that moment Natasha walked in from the kitchen bearing a steaming plate of pilau. ‘You were only the builder - it wasn't your fault!' she protested, rushing to his defence. ‘Well, what's done is done,' sighed the old man, reaching up to the top shelf of the cupboard for his best bottle of Armenian brandy. ‘Let's be grateful for small mercies - the Armenians still love us,' he smiled bravely, filling my glass.

As we sat back, sated with delicious pilau, the old man turned to me: ‘I don't believe in God - I won't have that,' he rasped in the shell of my ear so that no one else would hear. Even behind these words I heard an uncertainty: had he been wrong about that too? ‘Let's drink to peace,' said the old cold warrior.

***

Natasha's confession about her father had been prompted by her seeing the book I had been lent that morning. It was about psychotronic weapons. I had not heard the term before.

Apparently, they inflicted damage at long distance. They could implant thoughts in people's minds without their knowing it. Oh dear, I thought on hearing this, here we go, back into that unmapped territory, among the monsters. Back home, I would have laughed. But the man who pressed the book on me, a scientist, insisted that these were no fabulous monsters. There was a reason why they did not appear on my mapped world, he was saying: the secret had been too well guarded by governments. It was the dark side of the science he worked in.

Natasha was nobody's fool. She had been like a cat on a stove since seeing that book. Her reaction was what made me really want to know more. When we got back home from the party and she was asleep, I started reading the book.

Psychotronic weapons were no futurologists idea, I read. They already existed; they were capable of destroying command systems at long-distance. The information they transmitted could kill troops, and potentially whole populations. They worked by manipulating the electro-magnetic force-fields around living organisms ...

I looked at the sleeping Natasha. Was it possible that her beloved father, builder of the arms factories, had built a factory for psychotronic weapons? Was that it, the shock that had destabilised her life, sent her spinning round Russia pursued by furies, ridding herself of the antiques, the crystal, all the finery bought with her fathers' money?

----------------

„Lost and Found in Russia" at openDemocracy Russia.

Other excerpts from Susan Richards's book can be found at:

A visit to Marx

The first of three excerpts from a new book by openDemocracy Russia editor Susan Richards. Lost and Found in Russia tells the story of post-communist years through the lives of a group of idealistic young people in the heartland.

http://www.opendemocracy.net/russia/article/lost-and-found-in-russia-a-visit-to-marx

My Dream House

The final excerpt of openDemocracy Russia editor Susan Richards' book Lost and Found in Russia follows Natasha and Igor to Crimea. Seven years have passed since the author last saw them in Siberia.

http://www.opendemocracy.net/russia/article/lost-and-found-in-russia-3-my-dream-house

----------------------------------

New book by openDemocracy Russia editor Susan Richards

‘A brilliant, poignant evocation of a society in transition.'  Robert Service

‘Sheds a uniquely intimate light behind the facade of the new Russia.'Colin Thubron

‘A uniquely personal chronicle, and a testament to friendship.' Victoria Glendinning

‘Tells us more about the lethal tides of recent Russian history than years of newspaper reports.'   Philip Marsden

Lost and Found in Russia: a visit to Marx

January 1993 Town of Marx                        False Pregnancy

Communist rule had only just ended when I set out on my travels. The overriding goal of President Yeltsin's government was the dismantling of the massive planned Soviet economy. Yeltsin had banned the Communist Party and implemented a programme of ‘shock therapy': price controls were relaxed, the currency was floated and a mass programme of privatisation had begun.

Prices shot up twenty-six-fold in a single year. Russia's colonies taking their independence had already served to dismember the old economy. Economic activity was halved and inflation took off. Since the Central Bank kept printing money and offering cheap credits to industry, it quickly rose to 2,000 per cent, leaving the rouble worthless.

Deep gloom had settled over Russia. I was looking for some piece of countryside where people would already be starting to build a new Russia, one worth living in. Wishfully, I thought I might find it on the Volga, in the territory of the pre-war homeland of Russia's large German minority. In 1988, Gorbachev's government had decided to re-establish this homeland by way of making amends for the deportation of all Soviet Germans when the Wehrmacht invaded in June 1941. Since Germany's Chancellor Kohl had committed to supporting the project, I hoped that this region would have been spared the paralysis that had Russia in its grip.

So ignoring all attempts to dissuade me, I headed for the main town of that historic Volga homeland.

Snow-bound clouds hung over the town. The icy street was empty and the town was wrapped in silence. Between the houses, high fences sealed off the yards from the street. Presently, the door opened to reveal a small, curly-haired woman. ‘Come in, you must be freezing.

Natasha spoke in English, fluently. At that juncture, it was extraordinary to meet anyone in the provinces who spoke a foreign language well. As I peeled off my outer garments I complimented her. ‘Thanks, but here it just marks you out as a suspicious character.'

In her bare kitchen a three-legged marmalade cat was licking itself on an upturned log of wood. ‘You must be hungry if you've been staying with Anna,' she went on. Natasha had a lively, snub-nosed face and high Slavic cheekbones, though she was deathly pale. As I ate, she told me how she and her husband had ended up in Marx. ‘We were living in the Caucasus. When Gorbachev announced the plan for a German homeland, we thought it was all going to happen here.' She sighed and lit a fresh cigarette from the stub of the last. ‘We were just married. In love. Full of dreams. I saw this ad in the paper. Delightful private house on the banks of the Volga. I bought it sight unseen. "It doesn't matter if it isn't exactly what we want," we said to ourselves. "Once the Germans get things going we'll be able to do anything - restore it, build another."

Everyone warned us. My father pleaded with me. My cousin Borya, who's a KGB general, travelled across Russia to get me to change my mind: "Don't be a fool, it's not going to happen!" he said. He must've known something we didn't. But we wouldn't listen. You see, it was the new beginning we'd been longing for.'

Natasha sighed and poured us tea: ‘To think - I gave up my little house in the Caucasus for this barrack! It had this garden full of flowers..When we arrived I asked the driver why he'd stopped. "This is it," he said. "You're joking!" I said.'

‘Now we can't get out. Who'd buy a house in Marx now? We can't even get work. Igor's a brilliant engineer, and he knows all about computers, but he's been out of work for months. I'm a journalist, I've got a degree in mathematics and I speak English, but I can't even get a job teaching!'

‘How do you manage?'

‘I've got a few private pupils. Mostly, we just sell things. We had all these pictures, crystal, furniture ...'Now it was bare, except for beds, a table, some chairs and books.

While Natasha was talking, a man appeared in the doorway and stood looking at me disapprovingly. He was strikingly handsome, with olive skin and a trim moustache that curved down each side of his mouth as far as his chin. His black eyes, underscored with dark rings, were sad. ‘Ah, Igor.'

‘So why can't you get a job?' I asked him.

‘Because I don't belong,‘ he replied. ‘It's a town of serfs! There are no educated people here - we've only got each other,' he replied, fixing Natasha with his soulful eyes.

‘I used to be sorry for them,' he went on. ‘Then I realised you can't do that - you've got to judge them. I'll give you an example,' he said, walking to the sink and turning the tap. ‘Take this tap - quite simple, you might think. It turns on. It turns off. Well, our neighbours don't have running water.' I murmured something sympathetic. ‘What was that? Did I hear you say "poor things"?' Igor rolled his eyes. ‘They could have had it long ago - free of charge. But guess what?' He was in a lather now. ‘No, you couldn't guess, you come from the West. Those "poor things" of yours would rather live like that. Yes! The idea of change, any kind of change, terrifies them. They revel in their backwardness - in the Caucasus, where I come from, a man will at least pretend to be brave. In Siberia - Natasha's from Siberia - they've got a different kind of courage. But not in Marx! I tell you - you've come to the real Russia here!'

Natasha was watching with amusement. ‘I can't tell you how lonely it is. And ugly! You'll damage your eyes! Listen - when they needed bricklayers to build the new Catholic Church they had to go to Saratov - no one here could remember how to lay bricks straight!'

On it rolled, Igor's litany of contempt and self-pity, acted out with extravagantly theatrical gestures. He pulled out a bottle. ‘In the Caucasus we wouldn't call this drink. But you can't be too careful nowadays. It's the only stuff you can trust. The rest's all doctored.' The bottle, 96 per cent proof, came, improbably, from France. The couple proceeded to teach me how to drink raw alcohol, using fruit juice as a chaser.

A few glasses later, Igor pulled his log closer to the table and looked me in the face. ‘Come on, you can tell us,' he said, cajoling. ‘Why have you come?' I explained, not for the first time.

‘Don't give me that malarkey.' He was hectoring now. ‘Who sent you?'

‘What do you mean? No one!'

‘Who did you say you were working for?'

‘I don't work for anyone.'

Natasha sat back, relishing the spectacle of her husband baiting me. He pressed on.

‘Who paid you to come?'

‘It's not quite like that. You see I'm a ...'

‘Come off it,' he interrupted, sarcasm boiling over. ‘There you are - sitting in your nice London house with your charming children and your loving husband. And you expect us to believe that one fine day you decide to come and see how people live in the town of Marx! I don't believe you.'

‘That's not my fault.'

‘Ah, I get it!' Igor interrupted, ‘You're here for a bit of rough! You'll go home and dine out on horror stories of your brave trip to the heart of Barbaric Russia.'

‘I came because I want to understand.'

‘Understand? The woman wants to understand!' Igor bellowed, rolling his dusky eyes. ‘When has the West ever wanted to understand Russia?'

‘I can't answer for the West.'

‘You don't seem able to answer for yourself either.'

‘And you don't seem able to listen.'

It was almost dawn and I was fed up with being bullied. I lost my temper. ‘Look, I may be a fool for trying to write a book about Russia right now. I'm clearly a fool to have come here. But what about you? I can leave - you're stuck. Anyway, who'd send a spy to a dump like this?' There was a long silence. Then Igor fell about laughing and Natasha threw her arms round my neck and started kissing me: ‘Honey, honey look to me - I am waiting for you so long,' she slurred, her impeccable English smashed by drink. ‘You're a wunafull, wunafull ...' Horrified, I disentangled myself and locked myself in the front room, where Natasha had up a camp bed.

I lay awake, stung by Igor's accusation that I was either a spy or a sensation tourist. How different it was when I set out on my travels in the last years of Soviet power, researching Epics of Everyday Life. Then, I wanted to find out how ordinary people were handling the revelation that they had been lied to all their lives. Often, I was the first Westerner they had met. It was people's resilience that struck me then. Where was that resilience now?

I woke early next morning to the sound of a howling cat. I had slept badly, mocked by my naivety at thinking that any island of prosperity could rise up here, out of this drowned land...I unlocked the door to find her scrawny and heavily pregnant, clearly about to give birth. After failing to rouse Natasha and Igor, I wrapped myself in a blanket and watched over her as she went into labour. On the wall hung a photograph of Natasha wearing a striped jacket and a cap made of newspaper on which was written the word MARXLAG. A strand of barbed wire ran across the picture.

By the time Natasha and Igor woke up the feline drama was over. The cat's convulsions had produced blood and afterbirth, but no kittens. Like the Volga German homeland, it was a false pregnancy.

------------------------------

„Lost and Found in Russia" at openDemocracy Russia.

Other excerpts from Susan Richards's book can be found at:

Building Heaven or Hell

This second excerpt from Susan Richards' book Lost and Found in Russia follows the same characters, Natasha and Igor, to Siberia four years later, in 1997. What is it in Natasha's past that haunts her, pursuing her across Russia? A very odd clue emerges. 

http://www.opendemocracy.net/russia/article/lost-and-found-in-russia-2-building-heaven-or-hell

My Dream House

The final excerpt of openDemocracy Russia editor Susan Richards' book Lost and Found in Russia follows Natasha and Igor to Crimea. Seven years have passed since the author last saw them in Siberia.

http://www.opendemocracy.net/russia/article/lost-and-found-in-russia-3-my-dream-house

New book by openDemocracy Russia editor Susan Richards

‘A brilliant, poignant evocation of a society in transition.'  Robert Service

‘Sheds a uniquely intimate light behind the facade of the new Russia.'Colin Thubron

‘A uniquely personal chronicle, and a testament to friendship.' Victoria Glendinning

‘Tells us more about the lethal tides of recent Russian history than years of newspaper reports.'   Philip Marsden

Russians don’t much like the West

Russian attitudes to the West are known to have soured in recent years. But it may surprise Western readers that the majority of Russians now express a positive dislike of the West in general, and particularly of America. Nor do most of them regard liberal democracy as a model towards which Russia should aspire any more, either.

These are the findings of an ambitious new socio-economic study entitled ‘Are Russians Moving Backwards?'  by Sergei Guriev of the prestigious New Economic School in Moscow, Aleh Tsyvinski of Yale University, and Maxim Trudolubov of the business newspaper Vedomosti. The research is based on the findings of regular opinion polls and on a mass of data on values, attitudes and perceptions between 2003-2008 which have not been drawn into the policy debate before. [1]

The findings are stark. When Russian attitudes to democracy and the market place are compared with those of other countries, Russians come out as among the least enthusiastic  in the world, a good deal less keen even than the people of Belarus.  

The obvious response to these findings is that attitudes will change over time, as people get richer.  But this study appears not to bear out these hopes. For where you might have expected young Russians to like the West more than their parents, in fact, the opposite is true. The youngest respondents (20-year-olds) showed the same degree of dislike of the US as their grandparents, while the 35-45 year olds were less hostile to the US.

Nor can we comfort ourselves with the thought that the more Russians are exposed to the West, the more they will like it, and us. For Russian attitudes right across the social spectrum do not differ markedly. Richer Russians do like the Western model better than the poor, but the difference is not significant.

These attitudes contrast markedly to the findings of the first studies of the beliefs of Russians after the fall of communism. Surveys in the early 1990s reflected a people excited by the idea of the market economy. Disillusionment with the market set in sharply after a painful decade of economic chaos and reform. In the early 2000s, when Putin's government pulled back from the process of democratisation, including reining in the press, Russia's people  were right behind him. When the government reversed its liberal economic policy in the mid-2000's, the population backed him.

Significantly, these changes in attitude took place during the Russian economy's boom years. The obvious conclusion to draw is that this was because the effects of growth had not trickled down to everybody. But this study seems to refute that interpretation.

Contrary to popular belief, the last decade of economic growth did not just benefit the rich: all the measures of economic well-being improved. Unemployment and poverty went down by half, and real wages tripled. Russians were taking their holidays abroad, buying cars and mobile phones to an extent that would have been unimaginable in the 1990s. An index of life satisfaction taken in 2008 comparing the same representative panel of Russians whose attitudes had been charted since 1994 found that people were substantially happier than in the late 1990s.

The authors point to the fact that Russians have made a false connection between positive economic outcomes and the reversal of market and democratic freedoms, and adjusted their beliefs accordingly. They have come to associate market reforms with poverty and unemployment. 

When asked in the first quarter of 2008 whether Western society  was a good model for Russia, 60%  responded negatively, and only 7.2% came out as strongly positive. This response is particularly intriguing in light of the fact that 47% saw Western society as delivering much fairer outcomes than Russian society.  And this attitude has only hardened over the last 4 years. 

It would be comfortable  for us to blame these negative attitudes on the machinations of an autocratic political elite who have clawed back an almost Soviet control over the hearts and minds of the population. But this study does not bear out that reading.  The facts suggest something more interesting. What comes through loud and clear is that if Russia were fully democratic today, its people would vote for the reversal of many pro-market reforms.

In other words, far from being imposed from the top, the study suggests that the pervasive anti-Westernism of Russia's people may poses a serious dilemma for the leadership. Should the leadership wish to implement further liberal economic reforms, the authors suggest, this could prove a binding constraint.

They point out that with the main market infrastructure now in place, the country faces a new economic challenge: how to build a knowledge economy in Russia.  The economic growth Russia now needs depends on it developing a culture of technological innovation. And this in turn appears to depend fairly directly on political liberalisation. The authors maintain that both Putin and Medvedev seem to understand this: by way of evidence, they point to the leaders' campaign speeches in February 2008, which stress the intrinsic value of freedom as a pre-requisite for the ‘innovation economy'.

Whatever the authors really mean by this, it would be deeply unwise to take the leaders' words in these speeches at their face value. But none the less the underlying point they are making is crucial. It would follow from these findings that even if President Medvedev did have the power and the will to change the regime's direction in the interests of building a knowledge economy, taking ‘the people' with him would be a problem. 

What chance of change?

The authors of the report conclude that these attitudes are unlikely to change. They remind us that ever since the 15thc the Russians have seen themselves as the standard-bearers for an alternative kind of civilisation, under the banner of Orthodoxy.  They observe that it was this belief that fuelled the sharp divide that emerged in the 19th century between the Westernisers and the Slavophiles, who argued that Russia must resist the temptation of following the path of European development, in favour of a spiritually superior Russian path.

How alarmed should we be by these findings? It is tempting to quibble that the Russian people had, and still have, no idea what they are talking about when they reject democracy so glibly. After all, they have had no experience of it. At the time when they were most enthusiastic about it, in those final days of Soviet power, what they were invoking was not so much a political option as a magical spell which they trusted would, when pronounced, yield ‘liberation'.

Still, the authors' conclusions should not be dismissed. This would risk echoing the mistake the market fundamentalists made when, believing in ‘the end of history' they imposed on the rest of the world a model a set of political values which was the hard-won product of Europe's particular history.

The attitudes in this report certainly reflect forces deeply rooted in Russian consciousness. These go back, indeed, far further than the 15thc, to the basic facts of Russia's unpropitious position on the map. The underlying culture of its people has been conditioned by a wretched climate, unreliable rainfall, (mostly) poor soil and a short growing season.   The  experience of surviving in these difficult conditions forged a deep-rooted mentality very different from the European one out of which liberal democracy developed. Russia may no longer be a peasant society. But the high premium on the solidarity of the group over individuality and  initiative so characteristic of peasant societies has not changed.  

A glance at the map reinforces the findings of this report in another important respect too. Russia is a vast land which is not on the crossroads to anywhere, it reminds us. The suspicion of ‘foreign' ideas echoed in this report is deeply rooted in that geography. It will take far more than a decade or two of exposure to foreign travel and a global market place to change it.

Western policy makers should pay attention to this report. But they should also bear in mind that the pendulum of Russian history will keep on swinging. This study is based on a particular period in the swing away from Western political ideas and models. How long this swing will last is a question beyond its remit.

[1]  Life in Transition Survey administered by the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development and the World Bank, Fall 2006. Also on data collected by Russia's Public Opinion Foundation, including quarterly surveys of 34,000 Russians in 68 regions on various aspects of their lives 2003-2008. Also on multi-country opinion polls including Pew Global Attitudes Survey and European Social Survey

Georgia's Byzantine politics

The sacking of the French-born foreign minister has opened a new phase in Georgia’s troubled post-rose-revolution history. In Tbilisi, Susan Richards assesses the challenge facing a defiant Salome Zurabishvili.

Chechnya and Iraq: imperial echoes, militant warnings

Military occupation, armed resistance, pervasive insecurity, the hunger for religious certainty, a compliant media and oil. The parallels between Russia’s war in Chechnya and America’s in Iraq are uncomfortably close. Will either ‘imperial’ power heed the warning they present?

The World's Fair

Flemish Fair
A Flemish Fair, by Jan Brueghel the Elder (1568-1625)

Every January, for three years now, people from all over the world have been pouring into the southern Brazilian city of Porto Alegre; staying four days to attend the World Social Forum (WSF) , then melting away. The first year brought 30,000; the second year, twice that number. This year I was among more than 100,000 people attending.

More trouble in paradise

To the outside world, the bomb blast that hit the Mombasa Paradise Hotel on 28 November was the latest strike in al-Qaida’s “war” on Western targets. The local perspective is different. For the indigenous population of the Kenyan coastal region of Msumarini and the neighbouring villages of the Kilifi district, the bomb was just the latest calamity in the region’s downward spiral into poverty and banditry. Before the bombing, a recent Kenyan poll voted the Kilifi district as the third most likely in the country to erupt in violence.

Defending the Palace of Western Culture

The disastrous climax to the Chechen assault on a Moscow theatre inevitably recalls the tragedy of Manhattan. The phlegmatic reaction of ordinary Russians reveals not just a different emotional register, but a nationalist trigger-instinct that carries great dangers. Will this at least unite America and Russia? The managing editor of openDemocracy calls her Moscow friends, listens, argues – and warns.

The discussion

openDemocracy’s public meeting on 7 March 2002 at the Institute of Contemporary Arts in London addressed the theme of ‘Women, Islam and Modernity’. Here is the audience discussion that ensued.

This week's guest editors

openGlobalRights editors

Our guest editors James Ron, Leslie Vinjamuri, Sophie Arie and Archana Pandya introduce this week's theme of:

Emerging powers and human rights.

Syndicate content