The Stop the War Coalition was founded
seven years ago in response to the invasion of Afghanistan and the subsequent attack on Iraq, gathering immense popular support as it brought over one million people into the streets of London on 15 February 2003. These heights have not been reached since; even as the war has dragged on, the anti-war left in the UK (as well as its counterpart in the US) has somewhat dropped off the radar. The recent financial crisis further crowds out the anti-war agenda in the public arena. But as I discovered last night
at a meeting on the subject "the US election, the economic crisis and
the war", the group is still going strong and working hard towards peace,
naturally maintaining its own interests in the outcome of today's
election.
There was an assumption running
throughout most of the discussion that Barack Obama will win, however
Moazzam Begg (ex-Guantanamo detainee) said, "surely, whether it's Obama
or McCain, things can only get better".
Despite flashes of high praise for
Barack Obama ("Let's recognise that Obama will be far and away the most
intelligent President in thirty, maybe forty, years") there was an air
of scepticism, both generally ("I don't think problems are solved by
leaders no matter how good they are") and specifically - regarding his
foreign policy.
Jonathan Steele summed it up, saying,
"Barack Obama made a principled objection to the war - it's true that
he has made concessions on that stance since becoming a candidate but I
think that he does want to get out of Iraq with some kind of dignity."
He then went on to criticise Obama's pledge to withdraw troops from
Iraq within sixteen months of attaining office as only referring to
combat troops. A large number of troops would remain to train Iraqi
troops (Steele points out that UK forces are doing this already, and
that it doesn't have to be undertaken within the country) and defend
the embassy (one of the largest in the world). There is also the
problem that all of the troops taken out of Iraq would be sent to
Afghanistan, and that Obama could send some into Pakistan. There was
further criticism that "he still seems to be talking about a military
solution not a political one."
The general consensus was unremarkable
in concluding that an Obama victory would be the best thing for Iran,
herald some change in Iraq, while raising major concerns about the situations in Afghanistan and
Pakistan.