The Karama delegates met last night to prepare two
statements they want to add to the CSW 'Agreed Conclusions' which they'll take to the
second meeting of the Middle East caucus for
discussion. Each evening they gather in the hotel lobby, share chairs and sit on the
floor, but found this evening that another delegation had caught on and got
there first. They squashed in anyway amidst the potted plants, laptops balanced
on their knees and got down to business. First thing in the morning the
delegates will divide up. Some will go to a breakfast with a key Karama funder
and some will head straight for the NGO
morning briefing where they'll inform other NGO's that "there is an Arab NGO
taking part in the CSW this year" and announce the round table they are hosting
called ‘Dignity and the Politics of Financing for Women's Rights' on Thursday.
They are constantly dealing with the question of whether
they will be able to speak in Arabic, submit documents in Arabic, whether there
will be translators present or whether they'll have to put forward only their
members that can speak English. Their email requests to the CSW to find out which
language will be acceptable go largely unanswered so they are forever
discussing the two scenarios. Last year they had several fights over their
right to present in Arabic and switched back and forth between the languages as
a necessity.
'Three minutes, two pages and double spacing': delegates wishing to make an oral statement in the conference hall for three
minutes must submit in writing, in advance and according to these rules. Karama
have spotted an opportunity to do so on Friday at 10am during the' Interactive
dialogue on women's participation in conflict resolution'. It was on their ‘to
do' agenda last night. I'm planning to
interview some of them for podcasts in the next two days. Everyone is keen, but
at this rate it looks as if the best chance of doing the interviews will be
while they are stuck in the eternal morning queues (smoking happily) to get in
to the UN.
Trackback URL for this post:
http://www.opendemocracy.net/trackback/35898