Quote of the day

My students taught me that everything was personal - history, politics, foreign relations - but this approach creates boundaries as well as connections

Syndicate content

Navigation

Medical abortion: a revolution for women's reproductive rights

Jessica Reed, 25/10/07


Dr. Hilary Bracken, Senior Program Associate with Gynuity Health Project, opened the session titled "Ensuring Women's access to medical abortion in their own communities" declaring that medical abortion (the abortion pill, or RU486) is the most important revolution in women's medical health since the commercialisation of the contraceptive pill. [more...]

Medical abortion induces a termination of pregancy without tools and is also known as a "no touch procedure". The pill contains two medications -mifepristone and misoprostol- which were registered worldwide in the late 90s and were introduced in the WHO's essential drug list in 2005. The pill is now registered in more than 36 countries, with less than 3 million of women using it outside China, and 25 million users in China. Its efficacy is estimated between 92 and 97 percent.

According to data from France, Sweden and the UK, the pill does not increase the number of abortions - it is less expensive than a surgical procedure and demands less staff-time. It is therefore a good incentive for providers, as it reduces overall costs. It would also mean that women with limited access to clinics (e.g women in rural areas) could obtain the abortion pill at their doctors' office - not to mention that the woman can terminate her pregnancy in the privacy of her own home:

"The woman receives the mifepristone pill to take orally. Then 24 to 72 hours later, in the privacy of her own home, she takes the misoprostol medication as directed by the clinic (...). Misoprostol causes contractions resulting in a miscarriage."

However, many pharmaceutical companies do not want to sell the pill locally, especially at a sustainable price. Many stakeholders are equally doubtful about the practice, as it puts abortion in the hands of women, and is therefore considered "threatening" by many.

Related: Study finds home abortion safe, BBC; Is a medical abortion dangerous? Women on Web

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.opendemocracy.net/trackback/34931

50.50 blogroll

16 days contributors

CAADA
EVAW
Fawcett Society
Forward thinking
Hayah
Kubatana
International Women's Health coalition
One World Action
OWFI
Panos
Pathways of Women's Empowerment
Patricia Daniel
Scarleteen
The F Word
Ultra Violet
UNIFEM
WAITS
WomanKind Worldwide

Blogs

Bitch pHd
Feministing
Feministe
Feminist Law Professors
Girl Drive
I blame the patriarchy
Pandagon
Shakesville
The Margins
Radical Doula
Women of Color

Organisations

Afghan Women’s Network
Africa's women speak out
African feminist forum
AMANITARE
Amnesty Ireland

Brene Brown
BRIDGE

CAMFED
Center for Women’s Global Leadership

Democracy School
DemocraShe
Desert voices

Education for peace in Iraq center
Equality now
EVAW

FAIR Fund
Federation of African women educationalists
Femmes Africa Solidarite
FEMNET
Fundacion Rigoberta Menchu

Genanet
Gender and Media Southern Africa
Genderlinks
Green Belt Movement International

Iranian Women Cultural Center
Iraq Speakers Bureau
Irish Joint Consortium on Gender Based Violence
Isis
IKWRO

Jerusalem Center for Women
Just Associates

Kosova Women's Network
Kubatana
Kvinna till Kvinna

Organization of Women’s Freedom in Iraq

Parents Circle - Families Forum
Peacewomen Across the Globe

PEKKA - Women Headed Household Empowerment Program

Shirkat Gah - Women’s Resource Centre
Straight Talk
Stop Honour Killings

The Alliance for Arab Women
The Green Belt Movement

Uganda Women’s Network

V- Day Karama

WEDO
WIDE
WILPF representative
Womankind Worldwide
Women for Women’s Human Rights
Women Law and Develeopement in Africa
Women Watch
Women’s Initiative for Gender Justice (WIGJ)
Women’s League of Burma
Women’s Center for Legal Aid and Counseling
Women’s Initiatives for Gender Justice
Work of Women

Youthrive