Blogpower Roundup - The Matt Wardman Civil Liberties Edition

| | | | | | | |

Matt Wardman (Wardman Wire): This is the second in the lastest series of Blogpower Roundups, and this is my roundup of some of the current live issues around Civil Liberties.

While there are differences between bloggers on some questions at the edge on just what comes under Civil Liberties, there's usually a strong consensus around the right to self-expression, and that restriction of topics that we can write about or the excessive monitoring of online activity are BAD things.
Heather Yaxley has reflected on the whole theme of Defending Blogs.
In this roundup, I've covered recent Blogpower posts, and highlighted a number of other posts that I have come across. As it is a thematic roundup, I am going back several weeks.

Colin Campbell's comment about extra speed cameras in South Australia prompted me to do some digging into just how many speed cameras we have now in the UK. The answer: one hell of a lot - perhaps 7,000-10,000 plus all those installed in cars and on motorcyles.

By my count there are 75 links in this post. Enjoy.

Blogpower Posts
I'll start with a rundown of Blogpower posts relating to Civil Liberties questions.

• Benedict White points the finger at Mr Brown's carrots and carrots in pursuit of a victory in his move to lock people up for up to 42 days during investigations.
• The Fake Consultant has a history lesson about the Fourth Amendment (against unreasonable searches and seizures, since you ask). Part one. Part two. He's excelled himself and also written about Why Terrorists Have Rights, and about On Politics And the Impact of The Internet.
• The Insomniac raised the Question of Conspiracy Theories, which in turn raised the question as to whether all this mad noise about Alien Lizard Takeovers and other scares in fact undermines real debate. Are we damaging our open society with self-generated smokescreens?
• Andrew Allison writes about Zimbabwe and discovers Curly's Corner shop. He also raises the thought whether having your rubbish taken away is a Civil Right.

• Curly (who is being declared an honorary member of blogpower for the next paragraph) has blogged about ID Cards and photography in the street constituting being seen as an assault this week, as well as staging a long term polemic against the War on Photographers, having been accosted by the authorities after taking pictures at a fair ground. This last post has some interesting reflections about the unwillingness of all of us to take personal responsibility for our actions and those of our fellows (and has received 125 comments) - somebody anonymous phoned up the police, resulting in the "follow", rather than simply asking him what he was doing on the spot. How do we escape this cancer of mutual suspicion and fear?
• CalumCarr has been waging a campaign against his local Health Authority for Mental Health Services for his wife for many months. Politicians have helped, and he has obtained, then corrected, press coverage (which illustrates the value of personal publishing). You can visit the CalumCarr blog for an Wardman Wire Usmanov-Schillings style series of more than 20 posts in the sidebar.
• The Morningstar has also been highlighting attempts to limit the rights of photographers with "Jacqui Smith - Happy For The Police To Make Up The Law" and highlighted a new cards to carry reminding Photographers of their Rights, while lamenting that we are in a situation where such a card seems necessary.
• For a lighter item in this list, Green Living tells you how to exercise your Civil Right to bake your own bread - in this case St Martin's Bread (Weckmänner).
• Heather Yaxley is a a Blogpower member working in Public Relations. She has been posting about the importance of the "public square" being free for open debate, and makes the telling point that a society that limits public conversations is like a family with children never allowed outside the garden gate. I think this "open debate" approach is also important as a counter to extreme views; everything must be up for debate. Heather also addresses the impications of a huge splurge of Government statements just before all the MPs go away from Parliament for 3 months.
• In Youtube for Democracy, Hell's Handmaiden asks "What is about the USA that is worth saving if things like 'free speech' and 'civil rights' go to hell?"
• Yet another Blogpower member has been taking an interest in restrictions on Photographers, and writes about a Walsall man called a "pervert" for taking pictures of his own children in a public park.
• I have a video about harrassment of photographers for performing legal activities in public too - in this case harrassment of photographers by Police Community Support Officers.
• Ian Whickham has noticed that Conservative MEPs have opposed a resolution condemning ethnic profiling, including fingerprinting, of Roma children in Italy by Silvio Berlusconi's government.
• To wrap up this list, Miss Wagstaff has been writing about how for some people just carrying a lighted cigar into a pub can cost you your job, and for others the act of writing a blog can have the same effect if you are in the wrong country. This can stultify public debate.

Watching them Watching You

Colin Campbell writes about plans for $3.5 million worth (roughly £1m if my conversion rates are right) of new speed cameras in South Australia. That involves 20 new red light and speed cameras, and will mean 90 would then exist in Western Australia (population 2 million people).
I thought I'd have a look at our situation since I'm currently involved in an argument about it elsewhere.

In the Old Country this Parliamentary answer shows just under 5,000 fixed speed camera sites (i.e., excluding red-light cameras) operating within the National Programme in March 2007, excluding sites established in each area before that area came into the national programme, or schemes not covered by it (I'm not sure how many of these there are). It quotes 439 such sites in London.

These people say that there are about 6,000 speed cameras operating nationwide, and that one on one road in my neck of the woods (Nottingham) has caught 76,000 motorists in 5 years. For a comparison number, this Parliamentary Answer identified 681 sites for London "Safety Cameras" (it's in quotes as it is an official phrase), which includes Red Light cameras and Speed Camera sites in London in 2006-7.

I am not clear whether these these numbers exclude the almost 700 cameras at roughly 160 locations (and 10 mobile units) used for enforcing the London Congestion Charge. Incidentally these cameras operate 24 hours a day, despite the Congestion Charge being in operation for only around half of that period. Apparently they are on overnight because it is too expensive to switch them off - not very green.

The most comprehensive database (from Pocket GPS World) includes 7048 mobile camera sites plus another 948 pending; some mobiles cameras are always operating, 995 Red Light Camera Sites, and 4457 fixed camera installations (3545 Gatso, 17 temporary, 343 SPECS - average speed monitoring, 332 Truvelo, 188 Monitron and 32 Redspeed). The terms are explained here. Meanwhile the Government does not collect complete national statistics (see Parliamentary answers linked above). Hmmm.

This is all published data, it should be reasonably accurate if you read the qualifications. Adding them up, the UK fixed speed camera total is likely to be somewhere north of 6,000, with an unidentified number of mobile speed camera teams operating at designated sites, and perhaps another 1,000 to 2,000 more red light cameras operating.

On those mobile camera teams, one figure is that in 2005 the BBC identified 3500 of them. And then there are all the cameras installed in traffic cars and police bikes, but I don't have numbers for those.

So ... enjoy your camera freedom while it lasts, Cobber. Or move here if you want to experience your future now. On a very serious camera related Civil Liberties point - the right to restitution after a manifest injustice - there has been a recent case in Lambeth where the method used to issue tickets was thrown out by the Ajudicator on Appeal (380k pdf) - a zoomed in camera reduced the apparent depth of field in the photo - but the Council tried to justify holding on to the rest of the £628,000 that had been raised by the particular camera.

My concern is twofold: Firstly, I think speed (note: not red light) cameras are a monumental white elephant - because I think that the same objectives can be delivered more effectively by other means without the monitoring and enforcement bureaucracy. Secondly, as shown by the case quoted above - the rule of law is sometimes simply flouted by those who should be enforcing it without fear or favour.
Meanwhile, James Robson and Heather Brooke have recently identified that our Police Forces spend 40m UKP a year on Public Relations. I have no idea how much of that goes on justifying cameras.

And two more issues

At the moment there is no end of Civil Liberties causes to be chasing. Here are two more that I have not mentioned yet.

Harry's Place Legal Action

Harry's Place are under threat of legal action for simply reporting a story. More background here and here at Ministry of Truth, and at Bloggerheads.
 

Story "Borrowers"

[21/7/2008 5:45pm Paragraph re-edited for precision, and clearly to distinguish between the event and my interpretion].

There are case where particular newspapers and their websites are taking blog stories and using, or even simply reproducing, them without asking permission first or when permission has been denied. This has been going on for years, but perhaps it's time to tackle it head on.

In one example recently the Mail on Sunday reproduced a story from the blog "My Private Secret Diary" without receiving permission to do so. As Jonny Norfolk stated in a letter sent the mail after the fact:

The piece (in its entirety) consisted of copyrighted articles lifted without my knowledge or consent from a website for which I am the registered owner…

My view is that reproducing material a) in a way that falls outside copyright law and b) without permission violates the law, and bloggers are simply writers entitled to legal protection - like everyone else. Reproducing material in a editorial context, for reporting or for review is one thing; reproducing whole articles without permission for your commercial publication is entirely different. What is worse, the Mail on Sunday does this as a matter of policy. When questioned they said:

We generally take the view that blogs published on the internet have already been placed in the public domain by their authors.

There you have it.

From outside Blogpower

It's traditional to include several stories from non-Blogpower sources. These are resources that you may not know about.
MySociety is a charity run by Tom Steinberg (interview with Nestoria Blog) which does projects aiming to help citizens make a difference in simple ways. Most people have heard of They Work for You, but there are other projects that can be useful. Here are two more.

• HearFromYourMP encourages and enables MPs to run email lists for their constituents, and to allow those constituents to discuss ideas in a way which doesn't bombard them with email.
• WriteToThem is the definitive place to contact any of your elected representatives. Enter a single postcode and it'll tell you who all your local representatives are, and a bit about who you should contact for which reasons. Note that this site covers Local Councillors as well as MPs and MEPs.

Bloghounds is a new blog network being set up by the founder of Blogpower, James Higham - now up to around 20 members.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation - the granddaddy of Open-Internet organisations - has had an office in Europe for a little more than a year. Watch the EFF Europe Webpage to keep an eye on EU and European Parliament related developments.

Finally, an object lesson in the collatoral damage caused by insufficiently tightly targeted restrictions. The EFF "Deeplinks" Blog has a post showing how a (laudable in my view) attempt to restrict pornography on Usenet by closing down 88 groups, is resulting in some cases in the unnecessary closing of a total of 19,000 groups:

Attorney General Cuomo has pressured these companies into censoring enormous amounts of First Amendment-protected material after an investigation found 88 groups containing child pornography, or 0.5% of the active discussion groups in the alt.* hierarchy. Verizon and Sprint are taking down one gigantic subset of groups, the very popular alt.* hierarchy, AT&T will block all alt.binaries.* groups, while Time Warner Cable and AOL are shutting down their Usenet service entirely.

And finally, China has finally blocked The Onion Router (read it to find out what that is), despite the promises for more openness in the year of the " Potemkin " Olympics.
And the BBC iPM programme has been doing some excellent work - they have recently covered the Lambeth story above, and also a story about the new Communications Data Act. They did a brief roundup on 21st July.
Wrapping Up
OK. Enough. I've only covered half of the Blogpower blogs, and I'll do another roundup before long based on the other half.

| | | | | | | |