Part of the openDemocracy Network

The British Crisis

Do the public really want to change ‘the system’?: Stuart Wilks-Heeg presents polling evidence
 

Don't trust MPs' constitutional poker: Guy Aitchison supports the call for a citizens' convention
 

Brown's 'National Council for Democratic Renewal': Anthony Barnett on the Prime Minister's desperate proposal
 

More in this series

Who Polices The Police?

Open letter to the BBC: Guy Aitchison and Stuart White raise serious concerns with the BBC's coverage of G20 policing
 

The Met must stop spinning G20 policing: Defend Peaceful Protest on the Met's response to its critics
 

Met watchdog criticises G20 policing: Anna Bragga reports on the MPA meeting
 

Our campaign to defend peaceful protest launches: Guy Aitchison and Andy May have some questions for the Met following the policing of the G20
 

The architectural photographer as terrorist: Edward Denison recounts his detention for photographing a police station
 

Letter to the Beeb: Guy Aitchison responds to a complacent and misleading feature on "kettling" for the BBC website
 

Not "kettling" but "bubbling": Clare Coatman on polarised views of police and protesters
 

Kettling - another special relationship: Charles Shaw's eye-witness account of the practice's US debut
 

Practical proposals to reform the police: Guy Aitchison invites OK readers to add to a list
 

Met orders review into policing of protests: Guy Aitchison comments on Sir Paul Stephenson's suggestions
 

Trapped and beaten by police in Climate Camp: Testimony from Chris Abbott

More in this series

The Damian Green Affair


A Very British Arrest: Laura Sandys on the precedent of her father's 1939 experience.


One reason why the police are dangerous, undemocratic and stupid: Anthony Barnett condemns an attack on democracy.


Questioned by the Met: An MP's experience: Tony Clarke on the crucial differences with his own case.


A Constitutional Failure: The Damian Green case highlights the need for a written constitution, argues Tom Griffin.

Immigration islands


The Return of Enoch: Enoch Powell's repatriation agenda must not be rehabilitated, argues Sunder Katwala.


The ugly economics of immigration: Paul Kingsnorth on why the left is out of step with working class interests.


Immigration and the Politics of Resentment: Shamser Sinha suggests the real problem is a politics that turns neighbour against neighbour.

A neoliberal kingdom


Britain’s neo-liberal state: The financial crisis exposes the need for democratic modernisation, argue Gerry Hassan and Anthony Barnett.


MODERN LIBERTY



Digital Privacy Wars: Guy Aitchison flags up a debate on the threat business poses to digital privacy


The Stalker State: Phil Booth of No2ID on the proposed Comms database


Say 'No' to 42 days: Sign Amnesty's petition against extending pre-charge detention


What do we do now?: Anthony Barnett assesses the stakes for for liberals and radicals in David Davis's campaign against the erosion of rights and liberties


The Abundance of Caution: an authoritative essay by Anthony Barnett sets out the case against 42 Days

Labour After Brown

The next left -Life after the Labour Party: Gerry Hassan sees a historic opportunity for the emergence of a post-New Labour left.

Scottish Labour, where's the coffee?: Gerry Hassan assesses the prospects for Scottish Labour and its new leader.

Lesson for the Left from Chile to Britain: Hassan Akram offers a global perspective on Labour's malaise.

From Milibland to Johnson land?: Jeremy Gilbert argues for Labour without neo-liberalism.

Magical thinking on Britishness: Anthony Barnett critiques Liam Byrne on fraternity.

Rule of law at risk: Geoffrey Bindman calls for a turn away from the marketisation of government.

A new Bill of Rights for Britain?: Guy Aitchison analyses Parliament's proposed new Bill of Rights.

Miliband - by our rights we will know you: Claire O'Brien puts forward a new progressive vision for Labour.

Recapturing liberal Britain: David Marquand challenges Labour's constitutional orthodoxy.

Miliband and the Liberal Democrats: James Graham on the case for realignment.

What is Labour's British story?: Writing from Scotland, Gerry Hassan widens the OurKingdom debate on Labour's future.

This is not Brown's crisis but Britain's: David Marquand says social democracy is bust and Britain may be too.

The Challenges for Miliband's Progressive Fusion: Fabian Society head Sunder Katwala responds to David Miliband.

England Awakes?

England, Britain and multiculturalism: an OurKingdom exchange

A mild awakening?, England's turn? by David Goodhart

Navigation

delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Syndicate content

Labour sleepwalking into breaking the trade union link

, 10 - 12 - 2008
delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Matthew Oliver (London, Unlock Democracy): The results of Unlock Democracy’s recent survey should act as a wake-up call to those members of the Labour movement who believe that the issue of party funding can be kicked into the long grass. 

The survey, commissioned by The Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust, finds that the Labour party risks a future Conservative government, possibly supported by Liberal Democrats and other parties, destroying the existing Labour-Union link if it fails to introduce meaningful reforms to the party funding system in this session of Parliament.  

Sir Hayden Phillips wrote in 2007 that party finance reform was “within our reach but not in our immediate grasp". If Labour does not take action soon on these issues, these results show that they well find that the Conservative Party has snatched the opportunity from them and done with it what they will.

There currently exists a large amount of cross party consensus on party finance reform.  For instance the majority of Labour and Conservative respondents agreed with Sir Hayden Phillip’s recommendations that there should be a cap of £50,000 on political donations to political parties.  However, there are key differences in opinion between the two main parties about how best to proceed and these differences are hardening, most obviously in terms of capping trade union donations.   

There is a clear lack of sympathy on Conservative benches for continued trade union funding of the Labour Party at current levels.  The majority of respondents believe that donations should be capped at the same level, with no exemptions for affiliation fees, including 84.38 per cent of Conservative respondents.  This strength of feeling can further be seen in the fact that nearly 80 per cent of Conservative MPs who answered believe that a new Conservative Government would legislate in this area in a first term.  This shows that there is a real desire on the Conservative benches to fundamentally alter the Labour trade union relationship. 

However, it seems Labour MPs have not woken up to that fact with nearly 60 per cent believing that the Conservatives won’t legislate. If they do not soon Labour may well be facing legislation in the next parliament which not only breaks the Labour Party trade union link as we know it, (which a future Labour Government would have trouble repealing) but also creates a large black hole in its finances.  

If this survey should shake Labour out of its complacency, it also points to a possible way forward.  Labour back-benchers surveyed supported 'individualisation' - treating the affiliation fees of trade union members as individual donations, so long as it can be shown they have given their informed consent to do so - by a factor of three to one.  

These remaining months before a General Election represent a political opportunity for the Labour Party.  The Political Parties and Elections Bill currently before the house, provides a current legislative window for reform.  If the Government were to introduce credible proposals on caps, and on other areas where there is broad agreement, (such as making small political donations eligible for tax relief), opposition parties would find themselves in a bind. To not support reforms would risk facing the political wrath of an electorate tired of incidents such as the Deripaska affair.

The choice for Labour Party is simple, if stark: reform now on their terms or risk facing a Conservative government who would force reform on them. 

Please support openDemocracy's "Needed: more democracy!" campaign.

We need more of our readers to support the work of helping spread democratic understanding and influence.

If you read openDemocracy and value it please DONATE:

Donate from the UK with Gift Aid

Donate from any other country

Donate via PayPal

This article is published by , and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it without needing further permission, with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. These rules apply to one-off or infrequent use. For all re-print, syndication and educational use please see read our republishing guidelines or contact us. Some articles on this site are published under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless specifically licensed under Creative Commons.
NewsCredit This article adheres to the openDemocracy.net principles.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

MichaelCalderbank said:

Thu, 2008-12-11 14:36

I think that the survey might well exaggerate the support for "individualisation" because the question is not sufficiently clear:

"Trade Union donations should be capped but affiliation fees should be exempt provided individuals give their consent for their affiliation fee to be donated to the Labour Party. (Agree or Disagree)"

This fails to make it absolutely explicit how the proposal differs from the status quo, where individuals have the option of paying into a political fund with affiliations (to the Labour Party) subject to the democratic ratification of the union involved.

My hunch is that if the specific proposal were explained more fully, then the apparent support for individualisation from a hastily completed survey could well evaporate.   

Toque said:

Thu, 2008-12-11 09:34

It's encouraging to see that both Plaid Cymru and the SNP advertise the 'stop funding Labour' opt-out.  It would be nice if the Tories and Lib Dems put up prominent links.

In the past I've always passed up on the opportunity to join a union because I didn't want any of my money to go to Labour.  It would be great to break that link and watch them bubble under, great for Britain, especially great for England, and fantastic for what's left of our democracy and liberty.

I'm all for a cap on donations.  And dead against state funding of political parties.  I'd like to see parties with less to spend, it might raise the standard of debate and force them to participate more in citizen-led and privately financed forums.  Politicians should use blogs, YouTube, newspaper columns, TV and radio - all essentially free - to get their message across.  We don't want a media circus like the US has, or the relentless attack ads and campaigns- we're already too jaded.  Let's have more soap-boxes and more parliamentary debate.

Wyrdtimes said:

Wed, 2008-12-10 23:49

Anyone a member of a trade union wishing to end their funding of Labour can find out how here:

 http://www.stopsubsidisinglabour.plaidcymru.org/content.php?nID=583;lID=1

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img> <map>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options

What next?

The Convention on Modern Liberty, in London and across the UK attracted more than 1000 people. Find out what happened and what comes next...

Books from Amazon

They say about OK

"the ever-stimulating OpenDemocracy"
Ekklesia

"See OurKingdom to keep up"
South Belfast Diary

"...an essential guide to understanding the dynamic constitutional situation..."
Peter Oborne

"...becoming a daily read for me."
Iain Dale

"To make sense of it all, check out OurKingdom..."
Matthew d'Ancona

"Worth a look...it is, however, recommended by Matthew d'Ancona."
The Wardman Wire

"Fast becoming the best political website around"
Tom Waterhouse, CEP

"...attracting energy from a range of contributors."
thenextwave

"...looks very promising..."
The England Project

"The excellent new OurKingdom blog from OpenDemocracy..."
The Green Ribbon

"On the internet, I keep in touch with openDemocracy, a website on global current affairs, and its useful offshoot, OurKingdom"
Andreas Whittam-Smith

"thanks to the fine folk at OurKingdom, (who manage to communicate a variety of perspectives in the way that only a decent group blog can)"
Nostalgia For the Future