Part of the openDemocracy Network

Power2010

Breaking the monopoly of the professional politician: Guy Aitchison's idea for popular forums in Parliament
 

When you're in a hole, stop digging: Pam Giddy's advice to MPs who still don't get it
 

Ending the divine right of political parties: Steve Hawkins makes a radical suggestion
 

Les Miserables and Power 2010: John Jackson diagnoses the political class's selective crisis-mongering
 

A call to oD readers: Helena Kennedy calls on oD readers to support Power2010
 

More in this series

Submit your idea for the Power 2010 pledge.

The British Crisis

Do the public really want to change ‘the system’?: Stuart Wilks-Heeg presents polling evidence
 

Don't trust MPs' constitutional poker: Guy Aitchison supports the call for a citizens' convention
 

Brown's 'National Council for Democratic Renewal': Anthony Barnett on the Prime Minister's desperate proposal
 

More in this series

Navigation

delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Syndicate content

The lesson for Labour in the social fund fiasco

Stuart Weir, 24 - 12 - 2008
delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Stuart Weir (Cambridge, Democratic Audit): Gordon Brown may have rediscovered Keynes and his nerve, but the politics of his government remain rooted in what has always been old-fashioned as well as neo-liberal about New Labour.  There is a tendency in commentary to attribute this to Lord Mandelson’s re-birth; he may or may not be the Darth Vader of old – let’s wait and see –  and some have seen a turning towards what we can loosely call “the public”, but he clearly reinforces Brown’s own impatience with anything that stands in the way of “growth”.

There is also a pervasive sense that the government has lost the traditional values that Blair used always to assert remained at the heart of New Labour – by which I mean a sense of communion with “ordinary people”, and especially the working and workless poor.  Brown’s abolition of the 10p tax rate shook many people’s belief in his government’s commitment to social justice and it has clearly not been restored, despite his insistence that his bold economic response to recession is designed to protect ordinary people’s lives and jobs.   

The controversy over the plan to charge interest on social fund loans reveals starkly just how far Labour has strayed from its old value base. Mrs Thatcher created the social fund in the 1980s as an alternative to the discretionary grants for which claimants in especial need were eligible. It was a mean money-saving device that saved marginal amounts of money at the expense of the poorest people in our society. To charge interest on these loans now would probably never have been politically possible.  But the fact that it was even being considered by civil servants and ministers is shocking enough. For Brown and Mandelson, it ought to be even more shocking, and salutary, to accept that most people seem to believe that the government may have gone ahead with it in the midst of a recession.   

Yet at the same time there are signs as politics is being shaken up that the generally old left in the parliamentary party and the rump of party members outside is being revived in progressive as well as traditional directions.  Take for example the incipient rebellion over the third runway at Heathrow that envisages a cross-party alliance in the Commons which may inflict a principled defeat of the government; and another possibly over the proposal to sell off the royal mail that looks also to inject new life into the Post Office.  There is here some sort of fusion between the party’s old belief in the public sphere, a rejection of divisive private solutions, and a new concern for the environment that could reinvigorate the party on which Brown and Mandelson must ultimately rely.  If only the party could also firmly grasp the democratic renewal that Brown falsely promised in 2007 and reject the data-base state and the anti-terrorism politics of fear..

This article adheres to the openDemocracy.net principles.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img> <map>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options

Books from Amazon

They say about OK

"the ever-stimulating OpenDemocracy"
Ekklesia

"See OurKingdom to keep up"
South Belfast Diary

"...an essential guide to understanding the dynamic constitutional situation..."
Peter Oborne

"...becoming a daily read for me."
Iain Dale

"To make sense of it all, check out OurKingdom..."
Matthew d'Ancona

"Worth a look...it is, however, recommended by Matthew d'Ancona."
The Wardman Wire

"Fast becoming the best political website around"
Tom Waterhouse, CEP

"...attracting energy from a range of contributors."
thenextwave

"...looks very promising..."
The England Project

"The excellent new OurKingdom blog from OpenDemocracy..."
The Green Ribbon

"On the internet, I keep in touch with openDemocracy, a website on global current affairs, and its useful offshoot, OurKingdom"
Andreas Whittam-Smith

"thanks to the fine folk at OurKingdom, (who manage to communicate a variety of perspectives in the way that only a decent group blog can)"
Nostalgia For the Future