Minor point - isn't it time people stopped using that constitutionally meaningless phrase 'the principality' when referring to Wales?

Never mind the semantics of the use of "principality" when discussing Wales, you should be concerned about the appointment of people who have such strong personal links with the assembly, that a predisposition to an existing proposition is probably a guarantee of a new begging bowl to fund massive spending by shopoholic politicians.

A second point, since when does the Welsh Assembly tail wag Parliament, Plaid Cymru is up to its separatist
tricks in the principality.

As far as I know, constitutionally, it is still a principality of the Kingdom of England (now united with Scotland), as Cornwall is still a Duchy.

However these outdated constitutional arangements should most certainly be given over to the public in each territory for them to decide their futures.

The Principality of Wales only comprises the Western half of the country, the former lands of the Marcher Lordships and the Lordship of Glamorgan are not in the Principality

"A second point, since when does the Welsh Assembly tail wag Parliament, ..."

That's extremely unlikely to happen. Any conclusions by the Commission would have to be presented to and scrutinised by Parliament – and the ultimate decision lies with the Treasury.

The recently published Encyclopaedia of Wales concludes its entry on the Principality thus:

“Until ... 1536 Wales was divided between Principality and March. Thereafter insofar as the name ‘Principality’ had any meaning … it was believed to embrace the whole of Wales.”

The Laws in Wales Act of 1536, whereby Wales was fully shired, removed the distinction between the Principality and the March of Wales but no ‘all-Wales’ principality was created.

Wales has since emerged as statutorily distinct from England. Wales (I believe) is defined as the 13 counties created between 1285 and 1536.

If anyone can come up with a statutory or legal definition for a Welsh Principality I’d like to hear it!

Anon 10:57  .........that's comforting, the "tail not being able to wag parliament".

 But when you visit the Wild West of Wales and listen to the aspirations of this minority (Plaid Cymru) you to may be concerned for democracy.

".. you to may be concerned for democracy. "

In what way are Plaid Cymru's aims undemocratic? You may not agree with the dissolution of the union but Plaid Cymru has always argued its case through constitutional means.

I would answer but as in Law, I prefer to see the witness, then I might offer evidence, obfuscation would be my first offering of evidence.