Parties split on MPs' household expenses

Subjects:

Tom Griffin (London, The Green Ribbon): The row over MPs expenses continued today when David Cameron used Prime Ministers Questions to revisit Gordon Brown's failure to vote for reform two weeks ago.

MPs will return to the issue this evening, albeit largely symbolically, thanks to a Conservative motion and a Labour amendment which both call for the abolition of the now-infamous 'John Lewis list'.

The consensus between the two parties ends there. The Tories are saying that "Members should no longer be able to claim reimbursement for furniture and household goods." Labour's version would coninue to allow for "reimbursement of reasonable costs of a second residence." The BBC's Nick Robinson suggests there's a class divide underlying the discrepancy:

Labour MPs say to me that it's all very well for a wealthy Tory to claim over £20,000 a year in expenses in mortgage payments for a very pricey house that they had a huge deposit for. Labour MPs on the other hand often have smaller homes, pay off their mortgages because they have to, and therefore feel that they need that extra bit of money to pay for a new kettle or a fridge when it breaks down in their second home. You pays your money, and of course in the ballot box, you makes your choice.

This article is published by Tom Griffin, and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it with attribution for non-commercial purposes following the CC guidelines. For other queries about reuse, click here. Some articles on this site are published under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless specifically licensed under Creative Commons.