• This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
  • This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.

Reply to comment

Phil Booth
27 March 2008 - 3:48pm

...are two distinctly different things. I was one of those who pointed out that the insecurity and non-secrecy of the ballot might have an effect. Almost by definition, anyone who took part in this exercise would be more-than-averagely concerned about democracy, and therefore more attuned to such concerns. Glad to see this picked up in your PS, not entirely sure that it doesn't inform your footnote [1].

In practical/presentational terms, were pictures/graphical 'icons' for the common features (or absence of them) ever considered for the 'voting paper'? I'm afraid I can't imagine the Electoral Commission ever signing off on something so complex, but there are quite a few things that could be done to make it more comprehensible.

Reply

  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <h2> <h3> <div> <span> <blockquote> <!--break--> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <hr> <br> <table> <td> <tr> <img> <map>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.