openDemocracy: Is the assassination of Sheikh Ahmed Yassin just another provocation or does it mark a qualitative change of Israeli policies at a time when the Israeli leadership has declared that it will withdraw from Gaza?

Sari Nusseibeh: I don’t think that it is a qualitative change. Such actions happened in the past, and they were always part of official Israeli policy.

openDemocracy: But surely, this time, Israel killed the most prominent figure they could possibly have hit?

Sari Nusseibeh: Sheikh Yassin’s prominence was certainly a determining factor in this decision. The appeal that he had to the Palestinian masses, his charisma and influence, undoubtedly contributed to the decision to eliminate him. Is this all part of a more general picture? Probably, but we would need to ask Ariel Sharon for this. But it is no secret that the decision is connected to Israel’s planned withdrawal from Gaza.

openDemocracy: Sharon’s farewell present?

Sari Nusseibeh: Yes, something like this. The other day I read an essay written by someone associated with the Hebrew University here in Jerusalem which argued that it is ultimately in Israel’s interest eventually to leave the West Bank and Gaza - but only after it has killed or massacred a substantial number of Palestinians in order to demonstrate Israel’s strength and might to them. Only if we do so, he continues, will the Palestinians understand that we have not left out of weakness. From an Israeli security point of view, he concludes, a withdrawal would then be acceptable.

openDemocracy: Some observers say that Sharon does not even want to leave Gaza. Do you agree?

Sari Nusseibeh: I think they are right. Sharon is actually pretending that he is making a step towards peace while he is in fact undermining it. In this way, he reinforces his image on both sides.

openDemocracy: How will the assassination affect politics inside Palestine? What will it do to Yasser Arafat’s near-moribund Palestinian Authority (PA)? What does the new Hamas leader, Abdul-Aziz Rantisi, mean by pledging continuing operations against Israel “based on democratic decisions”?