<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - The Virtue of Logic,  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/the_virtue_of_logic_0</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;The Virtue of Logic, &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The Virtue of Logic, </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/the_virtue_of_logic_0</link>
 <description>The great merit of David Hayes&#039; post is its reliance on logic.  The sheer awfulness of the terror attacks leads many to reaffirm their emotions in the guise of policy notions.  In truth, these reaffirmations are nothing but emotional reboots.  In the midst of the haze of feeling, David&#039;s call to a stark confrontation of ideals stands out as a bold launching point for the necessary discussion.</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/the_virtue_of_logic_0#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/taxonomy/term/55">conflicts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/forum_tags/democracy_terror">Democracy &amp;amp; Terror</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 20:16:44 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Todd Gitlin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20039 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
