<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - Dress Code,  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/dress_code_2</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Dress Code, &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>asaf.khan01 on &quot;Dress Code&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/dress_code_2#comment-430629</link>
 <description>It is better for Muslims to take the knowledge and wealth we may have gained in the non-muslim world back to our countries of origin, perhaps then we will not have to fight for the right to practice every peripheral aspect of our Islmaic life.  The Islamic state will not be European but an already established Muslim country.
It is fruitless to engage in a dialogue of compromises as Islam cannot compromise with other ideologies unless of course the compromise is in the favour of Islam.  This is a fact, for if as a Muslim I say that I believe the Qur&#039;an is the word of God then surely I am a hypocrite for compromising what I believe to be God-made with that which is man-made.  One need not be a Muslim or even believe in God to understand hypocrisy when one sees it.</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 18:38:46 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>asaf.khan01</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 430629 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Paul Wilson on &quot;Dress Code&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/dress_code_2#comment-430628</link>
 <description>Iftikar,

You said &quot;Islam is a maker of identity and belonging rather than a system of belief.&quot;

Surely the primary purpose of a state (actually taxpayer) funded school is to educate the children of those taxpayers in such a way that their own personal development is maximised, along with their future contribution to the society inhabited by them and their parents.

Any identity and belonging additionally fostered in this environment should be primarily focused on the nation state, directed by the elected government chosen by those taxpayers. Any secondary identity and belonging desired by those children (not, incidentally those foisted on them by their parents) should be pursued in private. If this means imposing a non-divisive school uniform to protect the personal human rights and freedom of individual children, then so be it. 

One of the fundamental lessons they must learn at home and at school, is that while they should be largely free to pursue their own agenda as adults, they must also learn to conform when and where it matters. Wearing a school uniform is good practice in this essential discipline.

The phrase &quot;Muslim girl&quot; is virtually impossible in reality anyway - a child of school age cannot possibly have the knowledge (either of the world and herself) to choose a particular faith from the many on offer (or indeed to choose to be of any faith.) This can only be undertaken by consenting adults - as we insist for social narcotics such as alchohol and tobacco. She was at most a &quot;child of Muslim parents&quot;. To impose one&#039;s own faith on offspring in today&#039;s world, is not much short of child abuse.

In a multi-faith nation state, with a high proportion of no faith, the state has an obligation to remove all aspects of particular faiths from education and public life. This is the only way to minimise division in society and maximise shared interests.

We are stuck for the foreseeable future with the nation state as the main macro-tribe for the human animal - to protect cultural diversity the state must rise above the mini-tribal divisions and represent the common interests only (including protecting individuals from tribal differences). Individual tribal affiliations are then largely free from state interference, as long as they don&#039;t infringe the common moral and legal code of the nation state that hosts them.

Individual freedom first, nation second, mini-tribe last.</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Wilson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 430628 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>owly on &quot;Dress Code&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/dress_code_2#comment-430627</link>
 <description>A School may adopt what it pleases as its &#039;uniform&#039;, within reason, and it is entirely within its rights to refuse to allow the Jibab to be worn, just as it is entitled to refuse the wearing of Jeans.  

&lt;b&gt;Respect and tolerance of Muslims is essential for positive community cohesion.&lt;/b&gt;

Quite so. But just because you are a Muslim does not absolve you from obedience to our law and to our customs. If the Girl was not willing to comply with the rules of the school she sought to attend then she ought to find another school. It is no more complex than that.</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>owly</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 430627 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dress Code, </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/dress_code_2</link>
 <description>Established 1981
London School of Islamics     
An Educational Trust
63 Margery Park Road London E7 9LD
Email: info@londonschoolofislamics.org.uk
www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk
Tel/Fax: 0208 555 2733 / 07817 112 667


Dress Code
A Muslim girl could not attend her school for the last two years because she could not wear the Jilbab banned by her school. Jilbab is considered to be a health and safety hazard and is likely to lead to an unhealthy competition among its pupils to dress more Islamically. The High Court upheld the decision of the school which is worrying and objectionable in the opinion of the MCB. The ruling is a regrettable limitation of personal freedom, according to the Daily Telegraph. The school has 90% Muslim girls and a western educated Muslim head teacher who had imposed the ban to prevent students from falling prey to extremist groups. She wanted to protect other Muslim pupils from fundamentalists. It is a multi-cultural and multi-faith secular school which is not suitable for bilingual Muslim girls. They need Muslim community school with bilingual Muslim teachers as role models. In the opinion of Fiona MacTaggert MP, the native teachers do not have the linguistic skills or relevant social and theological know-how to tackle the issues of the Muslim pupils in secular state schools.
&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opendemocracy.net/dress_code_2&quot; class=&quot;read-more&quot; title=&quot;Read the rest of this posting.&quot;&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opendemocracy.net/dress_code_2&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/dress_code_2#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/forum_tags/europe_islam">Europe &amp;amp; Islam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/taxonomy/term/58">faith &amp;amp; ideas</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>info_28</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31797 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
