open Democracy News Analysis - King Juan Carlos vs President Hugo, Justin Vogler - Comments

arisouza on "King Juan Carlos vs President Hugo"

arisouza — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:55:13 +0000

First of all, start reading history books, not only those written by fascist people like Juan Carlos, but also those who got to know Bolivar and other decent people. Second of all, stop thinking that your political and economical institutions are the best ones ever, so everyone need to copy all of you. Third of all, don't you all think that you have to, at least, shut up after all your wrongs? By this, I mean the old ones like killing lots of Native Americans, and the new ones like sending troops for Iraq. Finally, hope the colonization process' end is forthcoming, by then you should be careful because what goes around, comes around!

jamesg17 on "King Juan Carlos vs President Hugo"

jamesg17 — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:38:43 +0000

Zapatero is really responsible for this mess. Zapatero is a nice guy and Spain are lucky to have him but he was asking Chavez to respect someone who supported the coup against Chavez by saying that Aznar had been elected and represented the Spanish people. Well I don't think the Spanish people wanted an elected representative to be replaced by a coup. Since Chavez was also elected and represents the Venezuelan people, anyone supporting a coup against him deserves to be called a fascist and doesn't deserve respect. Did Zapatero even receive thanks from the Partido Popular for this defence of Aznar? Quite the opposite in fact. While Zapatero asked for respect for Aznar, Mariano Rajoy said of Zapatero and this incident: "Es la viva imagen de la impotencia. La sensación que da es que la dignidad del Estado no importa nada." Quite a ridiculous reversion of the facts. A simple gracias would have been more appropriate, which in fact is what Aznar himself said to Zapatero but then Rajoy has long seemed to me to be be even more fascist and anti-democracy than Aznar was. Zapatero should have ignored Chavez and just got on with business. Juan Carlos in common with many Spaniards has been brought up with the Franco version of Spanish history where the conquistadors actually brought religion and enlightenment to these uncivilised indios and weren't really there for the gold at all. And no, they didn't really enslave and massacre the natives; they all just unfortunately disappeared. Maybe Spain could make amends by giving the gold back rather than giving lectures. What is the economics lesson that Spain has to give anyone anyway - try to join the European Union perhaps and be highly subsidised by it? - because that's what turned Spain around. South America is working out it's own problems and Chavez is helping a lot by spreading his oil money around the continent - much to the consternation of his own supporters. The best thing Spain (and the US) can do is leave them alone to work it out.

amillanmon_2 on "King Juan Carlos vs President Hugo"

amillanmon_2 — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:13:13 +0000

Threateningly? Must be a joke. Maybe he was tired and even fed up of the continuous interruptions of Hugo Chavez while Zapatero was in his turn trying to stop the succesion of insults directed by President Chavez to the expresident of Spain who was not present. Most of spaniards like me wish the best to Venezuela and Nicaragua where so many spaniards went to live years ago and we believe that we have many things in common with the people of those countries, not only the language. We feel very near them. In this curious incident the King was right. The President of Venezuela was out of his turn and somebody had to stop him, because the chilean president did not. The problems of Venezuela will not be resolved by insulting an expresident of Spain for hours and days. Why does not Hugo and Ortega work a little more in real solutions to the many problems they have in their countries. ¿Hugo, porqué no te pones a trabajar en serio y dejas de hacer demagogía con pura palabrería sonora y vacía de soluciones?

JFox on "King Juan Carlos vs President Hugo"

JFox — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:45:27 +0000

El presidente venezolano se refiere a Bolívar con tanta frecuencia porque el Libertador representa, no sólo a los ojos del "pueblo" sino también a los de sectores importantes de la clase media, el ideal de un continente latinoamericano independiente de los paises hegemónicos de Europa y de Norteamérica. Bolívar did not just fight for independence, he fought also for social justice, universal education, equality of opportunity, and Latin American unity. He was an important thinker in his own right, and an engaging and sometimes brilliant writer. Most historians accept that he is one of Latin America's greatest figures. His legacy remains strong because he expressed ideals that remain important both to the people of that continent and to others further afield. Chávez certainly has something of the demagogue about him; but he is basically right. The western model of economic development has been tried throughout Latin America and found wanting. The poor have remained poor - in their millions; and they are fully conscious of their condition. Chávez wins elections, not because he makes passionate speeches or has a penchant for denigrating right-wing western political leaders, but because he is helping to improve the lot of those - the majority - who vote for him. The poor are benefiting hugely from Chávez's social programs. And they know it, even if the Rodolfos of this world do not. En cuanto al rey de España. Qué sabrá el de la villas miserias, de la lucha de los pueblos latinoamericanos por la justicia y por la dignidad? Victoria rotunda de Chávez.

joefranks69 on "King Juan Carlos vs President Hugo"

joefranks69 — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:33:55 +0000

I paraphrased Jean Meslier in the subject. Now to paraphrase Voltaire in response to Rodolfo: Some critics say that the Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez was not virtuous, that he is an authoritarian "caudillo", who, not satisfied with commanding men, wanted also to be esteemed by them; that he benefited himself from the good he did for the Venezuelan poor; that all his life he was just, laborious, beneficent out of vanity, and that his virtues served only to dupe mankind. On which I exclaim: "Dear god, give us often such rascals!" Finally, to paraphrase Rodolfo: Hugo Chavez is an uppity Indio, whose authoritarianism is offensive not in itself - for I happily verbally fellate a monarch - but because he uses his authority in an attempt to ameliorate the plight of the poor, and what's worse to empower them. If he succeeds, what will someone with class and education, like myself, have left to signify our status far above the unwashed masses?

Rodolfo on "King Juan Carlos vs President Hugo"

Rodolfo — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:50:37 +0000

It was a great pleasure for me to see King Juan Carlos shutting up this fool named Hugo Chavez, always mentioning Simon Bolivar and social revolution and rights and fascism and racism, which in my book is his mask his hide behind costume, so the people of his country don't get to see his true colours. Cuba had the same thing, and where is it now, under dictatorship that doesn't seem to go away, and so Venezuela needs to also see his real face before is too late. Poor people unfortunately always suffering and in need tend to pay attention to a loud mouth that promises things and in some way to blind them before he actually kills them, tend to out of desperation vote for men like that, and they pay the consecuences after a time. A man that is ignorant and without class and education, is leading a great country that does not deserve that. Communism in the sense that they view it, does not work, look at the eastern part of Europe and Russia how they changed their minds after years of enslavement and went back to a better kind of goverments, although true that in capitalistic countries the poor or the uneducated suffer, but there is a much better chance of prosperity. The world and in particular Latin America, should really pay attention to Hugo Chavez, he is an egotistical man, that craves for attention and would like to surpass in popularity Fidel Castro, which has managed with his totalitarian ways of goverment, to maintain himself in power for over 40 years. Everyone seems to agree that not one man should control masses, but that is what Fidel Castro has done and what Hugo Chavez is trying to do and the other two puppets that are following in the footsteps, like Evo Morales and Daniel Ortega. My comments ends again with Hooray for King Juan Carlos for taking the initiative and courage of a Monarch, to silence an ignorant nobody, that wants to be something at the expense of his people. VIVA SU MAJESTAD JUAN CARLOS.

King Juan Carlos vs President Hugo, Justin Vogler

Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:39:12 +0000

"Why don't you shut up?" shot King Juan Carlos, voice trembling and hand raised threateningly towards the Venezuelan president who had just labelled former Spanish prime minister, José María Aznar, a "fascist" and a "racist".

Justin Vogler works as a freelance journalist based in Chile, teaches political science in the socio-economics department of Valparaiso University and is studying for a PhD at the department of peace studies at Bradford University, England. He has spent twelve years travelling and working on development projects in southeast Asia and Latin America and is a regular contributor to the English-language daily, the Santiago Times

Among Justin Vogler's articles in openDemocracy:

"Michelle Bachelet's triumph" (January 2006)

"Latin America: woman's hour" (17 March 2006)

"Mapuche: the other Chile" (20 June 2006)

"South America: towards union or disintegration" (20 July 2006)

"Augusto Pinochet: chronicle of a death foretold" (9 December 2006)

"Bienvenido, Señor Bush" (8 March 2007)

"Argentina and Britain: the lessons of war" (3 April 2007)

"Chile: Pinochet's ghost, Bachelet's swamp" (8 October 2007)

Read the rest of this post...