<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - Broken Homes or Broken People? ,  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050/broken_homes_or_broken_people</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Broken Homes or Broken People? , &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>YAKSH on &quot;Broken Homes or Broken People? &quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050/broken_homes_or_broken_people#comment-489064</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
HAPPY NEW YEAR&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for this article and feeling the pains of a women. We are fully agree with you in this regards.&lt;br /&gt;
We would like to point out few things before this discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
As You said that certian percentage of women justifing the beating by husband. You have also got the reason for beating. Do you think that anyone will allow the indiscipline in any place, School, school, road, park, theater etc. The answer is definetely: NO, this means that they are also accepting the same.&lt;br /&gt;
Then how can you justify the same at home?&lt;br /&gt;
Who has give you the right to insult the house owner, the Father-in-law., don&amp;#39;t forget this, he is the mentor of the Husband. Had he (FIL) not made him like that, the lady or her parents had never married to him.&lt;br /&gt;
Whether they don&amp;#39;t have right to get the respect, food, shelter and love at the fag end of life?&lt;br /&gt;
If yes, then why the women (Wife) is not performing her duty or not allowing her husband to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
It is everyones duty to make a happy home.&lt;br /&gt;
Pl. consider another side of coin also.&lt;br /&gt;
Best wishes for success and good health.&lt;br /&gt;
YAKSH&lt;br /&gt;
PATI PARIWAR KALYAN SAMITI
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
 Note from moderator:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As this appears to be attempting to justify violence against women I thought hard about deleting it.  I have published it, not in the interest of free speech but because it is an indication of attitudes and adds to the debate in that respect only. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
BigC
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>YAKSH</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 489064 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Candace on &quot;Broken Homes or Broken People? &quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050/broken_homes_or_broken_people#comment-438380</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;quote-msg&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote-author&quot;&gt;Quote:&lt;/div&gt;With regard to attitudes to domestic violence, the NFHS found that 41% of women thought that husbands were justified in slapping their wives if the latter showed disrespect to their in-laws. Meanwhile, a substantial 35% of women thought they deserved a brutal beating at the hands of their spouses if they neglected doing the household chores or looking after their children.&lt;/div&gt;

 I bet theres a higher percentage of women in the middle east who agree their husbands are justified in hitting them for those same reasons.</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Candace</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 438380 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Broken Homes or Broken People? , </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050/broken_homes_or_broken_people</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2185/2062323740_bb42f94c58_o_d.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;by Anindita Sengupta&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm1.static.flickr.com/23/32170539_27dbf84ab5_m_d.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;7&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; /&gt;A woman I know has 
been physically, sexually and verbally abused by her husband for years. In her 
forties now, she has a teenage daughter who is growing up to be exceptionally 
quiet. An intelligent and educated woman, she gave up her career after marriage 
at her husband&amp;#39;s insistence. Over the years, the abuse worsened and she felt 
mired in her own dependence. About a year ago, however, she was encouraged by 
friends to take a part-time job. She is now earning (possibly enough to get by 
on her own), but she doesn&amp;#39;t feel like she can leave yet. We suspect she is 
waiting for her daughter to grow up. She doesn&amp;#39;t want her to face the stigma of 
a broken home.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Domestic violence is a serious 
problem in India. Over 40% of Indian women have experienced domestic 
violence at some point in their married lives, and nearly 55% think 
that spousal abuse is warranted in several circumstances, according 
to the third &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nfhsindia.org/nfhs3.html&quot;&gt;National Family Health Survey (NFHS-III)&lt;/a&gt; released last 
month. People&amp;#39;s attitudes towards domestic violence are even more 
disturbing. From&lt;u&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infochangeindia.org/WomenItop.jsp?section_idv=1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the news report&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/u&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
	With regard to attitudes to 
	domestic violence, the NFHS found that 41% of women thought that husbands 
	were justified in slapping their wives if the latter showed disrespect 
	to their in-laws. Meanwhile, a substantial 35% of women thought they 
	deserved a brutal beating at the hands of their spouses if they neglected 
	doing the household chores or looking after their children.  &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
	Given this attitude towards 
	domestic violence from the victims themselves, it is unsurprising that 
	nearly 51% of the 75,000 Indian men surveyed think hitting or beating 
	their wives is acceptable for certain reasons, particularly if she disrespects 
	her in-laws. A smaller number think bad cooking or refusing sex are 
	reasons for physically assaulting their wives. 
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
What exacerbates the problem are 
attitudes towards marriage and divorce. The sanctity and permanence 
of marriage is an important concept in our culture. Alhough more common 
than before, divorce is still stigmatised and there are huge social 
and moral implications attached to bringing up children in a ‘broken 
home&amp;#39;. Combined with the natural paralysis caused by fear, shame and 
helplessness, such factors exert tremendous pressure on victims and 
force them to remain in abusive marriages. Abusive men often use the 
fear of social censure or guilt as a form of coercion and control to 
make sure women stay exactly where they are - under their booted foot.   
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;pullquote_new&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Anindita Sengupta&lt;/strong&gt; is a writer, 
journalist and poet based in Bangalore, India. She is also the founder 
and editor of &lt;a href=&quot;http://youngfeminists.wordpress.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;Ultra Violet&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, a collablog of young Indian feminists.&lt;/span&gt; Like in other countries, violence 
against women cuts across class and economic status in India too. &lt;a href=&quot;http://youngfeminists.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/domestic-violence-why-a-new-law/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;A new law on domestic 
violence&lt;/a&gt; has been 
hailed with much optimism by women&amp;#39;s rights workers - and with good 
reason. But legislation can only be part of the solution to a problem 
which is deeply rooted in social and cultural attitudes towards the 
sexes. It is not enough to provide women with legal means or to ensure 
that they can be economically independent. (Although, of course, these 
are fundamental and very crucial steps.) The social and personal aspects 
of such a problem need to be addressed effectively as well.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Women need to feel that leaving 
a marriage will not subject them or their children to additional trauma 
and humiliation. That their ‘failed marriage&amp;#39; is not &lt;em&gt;their&lt;/em&gt; 
failure. They need to be made aware that growing up in an atmosphere 
of violence and abuse is far more damaging to children than a parent&amp;#39;s 
divorce. That marriage is only as sacred as the two people involved 
make it. That a ‘broken home&amp;#39; is better than a broken person.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Most of all, these attitudes need 
to be mainstreamed. Lexicon that judges or demeans divorced people or 
single parent families needs to go.  
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
To many of us, these may seem 
like practical, self-evident truths but many people in India do not 
view them as such. While attitudes are changing slowly, it is up to 
us to ensure that such change is accelerated. There are strong links 
between small judgements on morality or family and large issues of life 
and death. It is up to us to recognise these links and guard against 
regressive forces that would rather have battered women than broken 
homes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Picture: via &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photos/babasteve/&quot;&gt;babasteve&lt;/a&gt; flickR account.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050/broken_homes_or_broken_people#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog_terms/16_days_against_gender_violence">16 days against gender violence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/section/50-50">50.50</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050">5050</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">35171 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
