<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - Tackling rape in the UK, Sarah Campbell  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/5050/16_days/rape_conviction_uk</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Tackling rape in the UK, Sarah Campbell &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>sendtosadie@gmail.com on &quot;&quot;She was probably glad of the attention&quot;: tackling rape in the UK&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/5050/16_days/rape_conviction_uk#comment-438651</link>
 <description>Arakano, 

This is an argument that I often come across as an explanation for the low conviction rate. 

In fact, there is supporting evidence in 86.7% of charged cases of rape - so in the majority of cases it is not simply a matter of the victim’s word against the defendants (see this report: http://www.hmcpsi.gov.uk/reports/Without_Consent_Thematic.pdf). Supporting evidence could include: previous convictions or violent behaviour; forensic evidence (including evidence from the crime scene); evidence of a drink being spiked; supporting witnesses to events or behaviour surrounding the alleged rape. 

In many other crimes, there are no eyewitnesses to the event itself - rape is not in fact unique in this regard. What I&#039;d argue is that far more could be done to make the gathering of effective evidence in rape cases a priority, and to ensure that the victim is in a position to give the best evidence possible. Cases aren&#039;t only dropped as a result of lack of evidence - in many cases, victims choose not to pursue the case, sometimes as a result of poor treatment by the police. And police often &#039;no crime&#039;, and so do not investigate cases where there is evidence of previous offences by the accused - see http://www.newstatesman.com/200704160015.</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sendtosadie@gmail.com</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 438651 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Arakano on &quot;&quot;She was probably glad of the attention&quot;: tackling rape in the UK&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/5050/16_days/rape_conviction_uk#comment-438373</link>
 <description>A thing that always puzzled me about rape cases: since most of them happen with no witness, and so basically the victim/alleged victim and the rapist/alleged rapist contradict one another, so it is word against word... how is the true guilt of the accused ever found out? Especially given the benefit-of-the-doubt that is part of almost every modern legal system.</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Arakano</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 438373 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tackling rape in the UK, Sarah Campbell </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/5050/16_days/rape_conviction_uk</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Globally, the prosecution of rape is given a low priority
by criminal justice agencies, and across most of Europe
the rape conviction rate has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rcne.com/downloads/RepsPubs/Attritn.pdf&quot;&gt;fallen continuously&lt;/a&gt;
in the last thirty years. In the UK, in 1977 33.3% of all rapes reported to the
police led to a conviction. In 2007, this figure has fallen to 5.7%. The
shockingly low rate of conviction for rape has made headlines numerous times in
the intervening years, most recently as the government announced &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.epolitix.com/EN/News/200711/5ecff6de-d1b2-4869-8c96-d2ce4366eed9.htm&quot;&gt;reforms&lt;/a&gt;
to rape trials this week.
&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/5050/16_days/rape_conviction_uk&quot; class=&quot;read-more&quot; title=&quot;Read the rest of this posting.&quot;&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/5050/16_days/rape_conviction_uk&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/5050/16_days/rape_conviction_uk#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-fifty/debate.jsp">50.50</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/editorial_tags/16_days">16 days</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/taxonomy/term/51">Creative Commons normal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/authors/sarah_campbell">Sarah Campbell</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">35177 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
