<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - Gender inequalities and reproductive medicine,  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050/gender_inequalities_and_reproductive_medicine</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Gender inequalities and reproductive medicine, &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Gender inequalities and reproductive medicine, </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050/gender_inequalities_and_reproductive_medicine</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2185/2062323740_bb42f94c58_o_d.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;by Hannah Newman&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
My
partner and I began trying for children a long time ago. It wasn&amp;#39;t working and
I had this niggling feeling that it was not going to work. Call it a
pessimistic streak; call it intuition which led me to seek some answers from
the medical establishment. My GP decided that I presented symptoms which would
explain the problems we were encountering. However, after 10 months undertaking
every test under the sun it was clear that mine was a thoroughly ‘healthy
body&amp;#39;. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Meanwhile
my partner had been told by his (male) GP that reproductive issues generally
lay with the female partner and that it was not worth him undergoing any tests.
We accepted this for a while, preoccupied with my phantom ‘problems&amp;#39;. When my
partner &lt;em&gt;was&lt;/em&gt; tested and problems &lt;em&gt;were&lt;/em&gt; identified in his sample his GP
told him to ignore the results, and that our local hospital usually got these
things wrong. So it wasn&amp;#39;t until a year after our entry into the big bright
world of medicine that we got to see a consultant, and were told my partners
problems - slow moving sperm - were significant, and that the only option if we
were to conceive was to have &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro_fertilization&quot;&gt;IVF&lt;/a&gt;, or rather a treatment called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.womens-health.co.uk/icsi.html&quot;&gt;ICS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.womens-health.co.uk/icsi.html&quot;&gt;I&lt;/a&gt; where eggs
are directly injected with the partners sperm. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
For
me IVF was not an option.  I personally saw this procedure as intrusive and
unnatural, and didn&amp;#39;t see as any less weird than cloning. Cue
turmoil, cue despair.  But time passed, my
strength of feeling was mellowed by the opinions of others, and the overriding
desire to be parents led us down this difficult path. During our first visits
to the hospital I cried. What I was surrendering here was more than just my body,
it was my sense of self. I felt I was becoming someone else.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
We
have just completed a cycle of ICSI. I kept positive whilst my healthy body was
subjected to a seven week bombardment of intensive drug treatment.  Firstly to block my hormone activity, sending
me spiraling into a temporary menopause. 
Then to re-introduce the hormones that were previously active, but to
levels far beyond the realms of good health. 
I produced 18 eggs - the equivalent of a year and a half of natural
ovulating. One Saturday morning I rushed to hospital feeling short of breath -
my ovaries were so swollen they were pressing against my diaphragm. The process
was exhausting, but overall the reality that I experienced was surreal and
confusing.  Modern medicine had taken me
from good health to this state of physical and emotional extremes. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So
why was I treated for my partners symptoms? Though I have no medical knowledge
it seems that a simple treatment could be invented to increase the motility of
otherwise healthy sperm.  It is not only
that medicine automatically sees the female body as intrinsically problematic; by focusing on the female partner,
medicine is undermining the male, implying that a man would not take
responsibility for seeking and administering treatment. In this way medicine
creates and compounds gender inequalities, and as a consequence approaches to
‘parenting&amp;#39; at the point before reproduction has even taken place. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I
would really appreciate any views from anyone who has had similar experiences,
or from medics who have any answers.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050/gender_inequalities_and_reproductive_medicine#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog_terms/16_days_against_gender_violence">16 days against gender violence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog_terms/icsi">icsi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog_terms/ivf">ivf</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050">5050</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">35227 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
