http://www.opendemocracy.net/global_deal/who_runs_what Comments for "Who runs what?, David Steven " en http://www.opendemocracy.net/global_deal/who_runs_what <p> A year ago, the UN&#39;s climate change conference in Nairobi was described by openDemocracy as ‘rhetoric-heavy but action-light&#39;. But developing countries were <a href="http://www.oxfordenergy.org/pdfs/comment_0107-1.pdf">much happier</a> with the outcome. </p> <p> Why? Because the decision <a href="/globalization-climate_change_debate/nairobi_chance_4137.jsp">was taken</a> to set up a fund to help them adapt to the impacts of climate change. In Bali, however, squabbles about the management of the new <a href="http://unfccc.int/cooperation_and_support/financial_mechanism/items/3659.php">Adaptation Fund</a> are taking up valuable air time. </p>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/global_deal/who_runs_what" class="read-more" title="Read the rest of this posting.">Read the rest of this post...</a><p><a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/global_deal/who_runs_what">read more</a></p> http://www.opendemocracy.net/global_deal/who_runs_what#comment adaptation climate change David Steven developing countries Global Deal Global Deal global warming NGOs Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:19:53 +0000 David Steven 35268 at http://www.opendemocracy.net