<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - The ongoing exploitation of women weavers,  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050/the_ongoing_exploitation_of_women_weavers</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;The ongoing exploitation of women weavers, &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The ongoing exploitation of women weavers, </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050/the_ongoing_exploitation_of_women_weavers</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2185/2062323740_bb42f94c58_o_d.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; by D. Narasimha Reddy &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm1.static.flickr.com/119/282134637_6a419d3cd9_d.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;5&quot; vspace=&quot;2&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; /&gt;Violence against women has been a constant, in various societies,
for different reasons, across different time periods. However, in most places,
awareness and networking among women has been helpful. There have been
individuals and organization, who have been and are playing their role in reducing
violence against women.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;pullquote_new&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;D. Narasimha Reddy&lt;/strong&gt; represents the Centre for &lt;span&gt;Handloom&lt;/span&gt; Information and Policy Advocacy based in India&lt;/span&gt;However, VAW is set to rise for different reasons. Global trade, as defined by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wto.org/&quot;&gt;WTO&lt;/a&gt;, has
been distorting societies and destroying livelihoods. Pitting livelihoods
against each other across the countries, trade-centric policies and programmes
have been inducing situations which enable the growth of violence against
women.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The handloom sector is also part of this phenomenon. Women &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cottontown.org/page.cfm?pageid=473&amp;amp;language=eng&quot;&gt;handloom
weavers&lt;/a&gt; are now increasingly facing violence, previously unknown in most of
their homes. For ages, women in the homes of handloom weavers have been working
with their partners, inside their homes, on various production functions. However,
this work has been traditionally seen as part of the family engagement, and was never recognized an &amp;quot;income activity&amp;quot;. Women&amp;#39;s work increased as handloom
production graduated from household production to commercial production.
Despite this change, in many places, the work of women weavers was still considered as supplementary activity.
There has been no recognition to this work, neither in terms of praise or
costs. As a result, this production relation became a part of the exploitation
process. Exploitation of women weavers did not stop at this process level. As
the handloom production became commercialized and more organized in terms of a
sectoral activity, exploitation and subjugation of women weavers continued on
an equal scale.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
With globalization and liberalization of trade, the handloom sector
became prone to discriminatory policy changes, and unfair market competition.
This has induced further stress on handloom livelihoods.It is widely known that unfair and unregulated competition leads to
price competition and depressing wages. Many entrepeneurs and enterprises resort to
cost-cutting. &lt;!--break--&gt;Invariably, the
easiest option would be to cut wages or pay low wages. This is also possible due to large human resources available for employment, weak legal framework and
lax social attitudes. As a result, workers increasingly face decreasing
incomes. Women try to cope up with
these decreasing incomes in various ways: it could be through increase their
involvement in production work, increase the working hours (besides household
work), lowering their living costs (by compromising on the quality of food,
clothes and living spaces) or decreasing their needs (basic needs even, such as
food).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Men usually try to increase their working hours, find alternative
sources of employment, migrate, or give up. Their giving up would mean resorting
to alcoholism, crime, and suicide. In the process, they would find it easier
to take out their stress on women in their family. Women end
up working more, thinking more and taking more. They have to take in the
failure of men to earn more and respond to their physical and mental needs. Women
have to work more to supplement and/or bring in more income to cater to the
family needs. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
All these circumstances, not described above in detail, have been
the cause of violence against women. It is no wonder awareness programmes on
gender relations alone would not be helpful in bringing outcomes. There has to
be focus on policy changes which impinge on social and production relations at
the family and production unit level. While this conclusion does not exclude
the responsibility of men from becoming responsible and humane, it is merely
highlighting the need to look at other sources of reasons for gender violence.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Picture: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/focus2capture/&quot;&gt;focus2capture&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#39;s flickR account. &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050/the_ongoing_exploitation_of_women_weavers#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog_terms/16_days_against_gender_violence">16 days against gender violence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/section/50-50">50.50</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050">5050</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">35314 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
