<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - Gender Hatred from Conception Onwards,  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050/gender_hatred_from_conception_onwards</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Gender Hatred from Conception Onwards, &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Gender Hatred from Conception Onwards, </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050/gender_hatred_from_conception_onwards</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2185/2062323740_bb42f94c58_o_d.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;by Cath Elliott&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
There have
been a number of articles in the UK press over recent weeks
highlighting the increasing prevalence of sex selective abortions. Even though
abortion on the grounds of gender is not permitted under UK law, there is currently nothing
to stop women from travelling overseas to deal with unwanted female foetuses.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Female
foeticide is illegal in India,
but it still appears to be easily accessible, as this &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7121397.stm&quot;&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; from the BBC
illustrates:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;Sex
selective abortion - female foeticide, as it is known - has been illegal in India
since the early 1980s. Having a scan to find out the sex is also against the
law. &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;But the law
has simply forced the practice underground and UN figures state that 750,000
girls are aborted every year in India.&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I can
understand why, in certain cultures, women are driven to female foeticide.
In patriarchal traditional
societies it&amp;#39;s easy to see how girl children come to be considered a burden:
when marriage still means a dowrie to be paid; when the family business is
still the son&amp;#39;s inheritance, and when the care and financial security of the
elderly is the responsibility of sons and not daughters, what possible
motivation can there be for families to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article1403517.ece&quot;&gt;cherish&lt;/a&gt;
their baby girls? &lt;!--break--&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The United Nations
Population Fund recently published a series of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unfpa.org/gender/case_studies.htm&quot;&gt;studies&lt;/a&gt; highlighting
the sex-ratio imbalance in Asia, which it
produced for the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Sexual and Reproductive Health.
The future implications of this gender imbalance are spelled out clearly:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;The ramifications of such
an imbalance will not only continue for decades, but will affect an enormous
proportion of the Asian population. While men of marriageable age will suddenly
find a dramatic shortage of potential brides, it is girls and women of all ages
who will truly feel the brunt of this dynamic. In addition to forecasted
increases in gender-based violence, trafficking, discrimination and general
vulnerability of women and girls, it is crucial to understand what has led to
this imbalance in the first place: a deeply rooted preference for sons, which
leads parents across cultures and geographic locations to decide against
allowing a girl to live, even before her birth, and the increasing availability
of technology that enables them to do so with ease.&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
India, China
and other nations facing this issue have already begun taking steps to deal
with it, from outlawing prenatal sex determination tests to trying to raise the
status of women in those countries, but should the UK and other western states now be thinking
about becoming more proactive in tackling this problem?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In the UK,
the Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unicef.org.uk/unicefuk/policies/policy_detail.asp?policy=12&quot;&gt;protects&lt;/a&gt;
girls and women taken overseas for the purpose of genital mutilation, and the
new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/newsrelease260707c.htm&quot;&gt;Forced
Marriage&lt;/a&gt; (Civil Protection) Act protects girls and women at risk of forced
marriage both at home and abroad. Is it perhaps time for a similar law to be
introduced to deal specifically with sex selective abortion, that would prevent
women from travelling abroad and aborting their female foetuses? Or is the only
answer to ensure that women and girls are valued as equal citizens across the
globe? 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Can we
really afford to wait that long?
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050/gender_hatred_from_conception_onwards#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog_terms/16_days_against_gender_violence">16 days against gender violence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/section/50-50">50.50</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050">5050</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">35351 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
