<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - Undiplomatic truth, David Steven  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/global_deal/al_gore</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Undiplomatic truth, David Steven &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Undiplomatic truth, David Steven </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/global_deal/al_gore</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;My own country, the United
States, is principally responsible for obstructing progress here in Bali,&amp;quot; Al
Gore told Bali this evening, to ecstatic applause, putting the blame for any
failure to reach agreement firmly in the Bush administration&amp;#39;s court.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But he told the people who
applauded his words they had a choice. They could get cross with America, and
risk derailing the Bali agreement, or they could skirt around the country,
leaving a ‘blank space&amp;#39; in the Bali roadmap for a new administration to fill
in.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
Instead of holding out for
concrete &amp;quot;targets and timetables&amp;quot; to be kept in the Bali declaration, Gore
advised, it would be best to bank gains that had been made on adaptation,
technology transfer, and deforestation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;If I could snap my fingers
and change the position of the United States of America, and of some other
countries, and make it instantly easier to move forward with targets and
timetables included in the language you approve here, I would do so in an
instant,&amp;quot; he said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;But if we look
realistically at the situation that confronts us, then wisdom would call for
moving forward in spite of that obstacle.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I take that as a signal
that the Europeans will beat a retreat on their more ambitious demands over the
course of the night, but we will know more about that in the next couple of
hours I expect.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Gore also made what seems,
on the face of it, an entirely unrealistic call. Slow down in Bali if necessary,
he said. But speed up the process after a deal is agreed in Copenhagen, aiming
for full implementation of the new treaty by 2010. 
&lt;/p&gt;
That
would give countries only a year for ratification. Kyoto, in comparison, took
five years to take effect, the time it took for sufficient countries to pass it
into law. Three years for implementation has always looked like a minimum, but
perhaps the former Veep knows something that we don&amp;#39;t.</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/global_deal/al_gore#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/global_deal/al_gore_0">al gore</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog_terms/climate_change">climate change</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/taxonomy/term/729">David Steven</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/global_deal">Global Deal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/global_deal">Global Deal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog_terms/global_warming">global warming</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/global_deal/us">us</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Steven</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">35402 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
