aeionline_1 on "Pakistan after Benazir Bhutto"

aeionline_1 — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:50:33 +0000

But representative forces of this class of people, any where in the world, are in fact the sheer extremists who terrorize others through the might at their disposal which become available to them while pursuing a professional career in serving the interests of power-hunger 'global elite' who share ownership in military-industial interests and profit-hungry pharmy industry of the West (or more appropirately North).

There is something special to two countries of the world, created in the name of religion but in none of these religion is the guiding force - Pakistan and Israel; both of these countries are pivots on which moves logistics of the around 20% of the world ultra rich people so as to keep control of rest of 80% world population.

When any of these 'representatives' try to outsmart their masters, they meet the fate of Reza Shah (Last Iranian king), ZA Bhutto, Anawar Sadaat, Zia et al - all of them were taught or trained in the West so as to make them guardian of the vested interests of the global elite in the name of serving people of their own countries.

Bhutto became impatient and fall out with Ayub, to gain for himself a powerbased he hobnobed with the people of Pakistan against the interests of his 'Masters' and was thus made out an horrible example. In the meanwhile he could, but did not, make drastic changes in socio-economic and political structure system of Pakistan, though he gave a sense of a dignified life to the Pakistan, thus he received the 'horrible punishment'!

Benazir had to walk on tight rope, she opted to avenge her father's fate but went the wrong way of seeking blessings from the 'global elite' who, thanks to the evil wisdom of Negoroponte, worked out something very farreaching by using her life and death - a perpetual disorder in Pakistan for many decades to come so as to keep this strategically located country of 165 million people under full control and use it objectively to get full control over 'Euraisa' because only then they can meet future challenges from Chaina and ECO countries.

Now that 7 years 'war OF terror' with the help of best forces in the world (USA+NATO)could not fetch desired results, the global elite have to re-think their plan - the bogy of 'islamic terrorism' has not prove much lasting like that of 'iron curtain' and has lost is utility through overkilling - independent sources indicate that using this boggy millions of people have already been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan by now.

Benazir's killing is the cruelst cut for humanists and the humanity, but offers opportunities to the worlds social scientists and strategists in finding out ways and means how to loosen the cruel grip of 'global elite' from the throat of humanity - around 40% of world population live a life worst than death while a tiny friction of the world population live such a lavish life comparable only to the Parise.

Now the clock has started clicking too quickly for Musharraf, given to the circumstances which have rendered the boggy of 'islamic terrorism' unworkable, his fate might of similar to that of Reza Shah or Zia, we can only wait and see!

Pakistan after Benazir Bhutto, Ayesha Siddiqa

Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:25:11 +0000

Ayesha Siddiqa is an independent political and defence analyst. She is the author of Military Inc: Inside Pakistan's Military Economy, published by Pluto Press

Also in openDemocracy:

"Pakistan's permanent crisis" (15 May 2007)

"Pakistan: the power of the gun" (7 November 2007)

Pakistan's opposition leader Benazir Bhutto was killed by an assassin on 27 December 2007 in Rawalpindi, just after making a speech to supporters of her Pakistan People's Party (PPP). This makes her the fourth in the Bhutto family to have died violently. Her father Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was hanged in 1979, following his overthrow by the military dictator General Zia-ul-Haq. Benazir's younger brother Shahnawaz was murdered in 1985, and her second brother Murtaza killed in Karachi in 1996 (during her second tenure as prime minister). Many believe that both brothers were killed by Pakistan's intelligence agencies, just as they are ready to see some covert hand in Benazir's assassination.

Benazir Bhutto's political career began in 1977 after her father, prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, was sacked. The death of Zia ul-Haq himself in an air crash in August 1988 opened the way to her own accession to power. Her own politics were far from radical; in any case, once in power she soon realised the strength of the military, which was instrumental in twice ousting her from the prime ministership (which she held December 1988-August 1990 and July 1993-November 1996).

In terrorism.oD on Benazir Bhutto's death: Kanishk Tharoor, "Benazir murdered: what next?"After years in exile during the rule of Pakistan's military president, Pervez Musharraf, Benazir returned to Pakistan on 18 October 2007. The dangers were immediately apparent in an attack on her motorcade in Karachi which killed more than 140 people and narrowly missed Benazir herself. She threw herself into the effort to secure a return to power by mobilising her forces in the campaign for the elections scheduled for January 2008.

The lesson of tragedy

It was always going to be a tough struggle against many odds. For many urban and educated Pakistanis, Benazir Bhutto's political career was finished in 1996 when for a second time a government she led was overthrown. the grounds for her removal - charges of corruption - were never proved. Moreover, the political deal she had struck with Pervez Musharraf (no longer in charge of the army, but still Pakistan's president) meant that cases against her in the Swiss, Spanish and British courts were in the process of being withdrawn.

Among openDemocracy's many articles on Pakistan under Pervez Musharraf:

Ehsan Masood, "Pakistan: the army as the state" (12 April 2007)

Anatol Lieven, "At the Red Mosque in Islamabad" (4 June 2007)

Paul Rogers, "Pakistan's peril" (19 July 2007)

Maruf Khwaja, "The war for Pakistan" (24 July 2007)

Irfan Husain, "Pakistan's poker-game" (14 September 2007)

Shaun Gregory, "Pakistan: farewell to democracy" (29 October 2007)

Irfan Husain, "Pervez Musharraf's desperate gamble" (5 November 2007)

Iftikhar H Malik, "Pakistan: misgovernance to meltdown" (19 November 2007)

Irfan Husain, "Pakistan: the election and after" (10 December 2007)Many people in Pakistan criticised Benazir's decision to negotiate and forge an agreement with the military dictator. However, many others approved of her political move. They argued that since the military in Pakistan cannot be wished away, political forces have to negotiate their way to power with the defence forces and then try to change the system from within. This was termed the country's "transition to democracy".

Others disagreed; they believed that such a transition was not possible without some basic changes in Pakistan's governance structures - including the military's withdrawal from politics. The country could not transit to democracy unless a fresh balance was established among the various institutions of the state (especially between military and civilian institutions). Those who embraced the first view (transition without transformation) laughed at those who supported the second.

Sadly, Benazir Bhutto's tragic death proves that no transition to democracy is possible without some fundamental changes in the political system. The negative forces are too strong to allow any political player to establish himself or herself.

The day after the assassination - which in the accompanying suicide-bombing that followed took around sixteen more lives, and has been followed by violence across the country that (at the time of writing) has seen nineteen people killed - is one of intense speculation about the identity of the Benazir Bhutto's murderers. But a clear political judgment can already be made: that in the end, it was not necessarily the religious extremists but a different set of equally intolerant forces - what I call the political fundamentalists - who took her life.

In any case, "al-Qaida" is just a name which can be used to mean everything or nothing. It will now be difficult to find out who exactly killed Benazir - especially when the government made sure they washed away all forensic evidence in the twelve hours after the murder.

But this is not just an individual's death; it is also the killing of the only national party in the country. The fact that Benazir had held the Pakistan People's Party together also means that the party - in a condition emblematic of Pakistan as a whole - suffered from over-centralisation and over-personalisation. This combination of institutional and political failure underlines how important it is that politicians and civil society in Pakistan now carefully consider their options. The military and its cronies have to be forced to withdraw before democracy takes root in the country. As long as they refuse, the path of politics in Pakistan will remain extremely bloody.

Average rating

(6 votes)

open Democracy News Analysis - Pakistan after Benazir Bhutto, Ayesha Siddiqa - Comments

aeionline_1 on "Pakistan after Benazir Bhutto"

Pakistan after Benazir Bhutto, Ayesha Siddiqa