<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - Romanian odyssey: one day of life, Grace Davies  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/5050/arts_cultures/4months_3weeks_2days</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Romanian odyssey: one day of life, Grace Davies &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Romanian odyssey: one day of life, Grace Davies </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/5050/arts_cultures/4months_3weeks_2days</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Sitting in
their shared university dormitory, a young student agrees to help her friend;
&amp;quot;OK&amp;quot; she says, in an understated opening that perfectly captures the
essence of Cristian Mungiu&amp;#39;s quietly powerful &lt;em&gt;4 Luni, 3 Saptamini si 2 Zile (4 Months, 3 Weeks &amp;amp; 2 Days)&lt;/em&gt;. As
we gradually learn, the agreement is to help her friend to get an abortion, and
the ensuing drama is at once thoughtful, uncomfortable, harrowing,
heartbreaking, political and personal. To me, this Romanian film is an example
of cinema at its very best.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
We follow students Otilia (Anamaria Marinca) and Gabita (Laura Vasiliu) over the
course of one day in 1987 during Ceausescu&amp;#39;s personal-Communist dictatorship, as
Gabita prepares for and undergoes an illegal abortion. Throughout the unfolding
drama, a constant, sullied greyness is all-pervading, infusing everything with
a claustrophobic air. From the slushy streets to the institutional,
industrial-style university buildings and utilitarian hotels, Mungiu evokes the
Romania
of the time as a ragged, tainted place.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;/files/Otilia.jpg&quot; border=&quot;2&quot; alt=&quot;Otilia (Anamaria Marinca)&quot; title=&quot;Otilia (Anamaria Marinca)&quot; hspace=&quot;10&quot; vspace=&quot;5&quot; width=&quot;360&quot; height=&quot;192&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; /&gt; The style
is minimalist, complementing a naturalistic dialogue and tone. Characters speak
from off-camera, or are partly in shot. There is frequent use of distance shots
and long takes, such as the seemingly mundane opening sequence following Otilia
around the dorm through corridors and shower blocks as she gathers information
and goods in equal measure. The active Otilia, as Gabita&amp;#39;s steadfast and
pragmatic friend, is placed at the heart of the story, and it is through this
decision that Mungiu generates much of the emotional power of the film.
Skilfully subverting tired stereotypes of victimhood, it allows for a different
treatment of a difficult subject matter, and places that experience in a wider
political and historical context. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Lost generation&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Romania&amp;#39;s
misnamed ‘orphans&amp;#39; - the thousands of abandoned children discovered by the
world at the collapse of the Ceausescu regime - were the outward tragedy of the
state&amp;#39;s decades-long push for population growth, that outlawed contraception.
International attention was focused on a &amp;quot;lost generation&amp;quot; of malnourished,
abused, institutionalised children trapped in ill-equipped state orphanages
captured in shocking news reports.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;4 Months, 3 Weeks &amp;amp; 2 Days&lt;/em&gt; tells the other side of that story.
It is the first of a planned series titled &amp;quot;Tales from the Golden Age&amp;quot;,
designed to form &amp;quot;a subjective history of communism in Romania told
through its urban legends&amp;quot;, and it certainly succeeds in portraying the grim daily
reality of life under an oppressive regime. With no direct political reference,
I was still acutely aware of the overarching state presence throughout a tense
113 minutes. Mungiu&amp;#39;s stated desire is to tell individual tales, &amp;quot;focused on personal
options in a time of misfortunes that people had to live like normal times&amp;quot;,
and in this, he proves a master storyteller.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;/files/Otilia_Gabita.jpg&quot; border=&quot;2&quot; alt=&quot;Otilia and Gabita&quot; title=&quot;Otilia and Gabita&quot; hspace=&quot;10&quot; vspace=&quot;5&quot; width=&quot;360&quot; height=&quot;205&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; In Romania in1987
abortion was illegal, outlawed by the Communist state in 1966 and punishable by
up to five years in prison for any doctors or nursing staff involved in performing
the procedure or helping a woman to obtain one. Under a political system aggressively
pursuing a population-growth programme, all issues surrounding reproductive
rights were fraught. In addition to the ban, all childless women between the
ages of 25 and 45 were forcedo attend a clinic each month for a pregnancy
test by the so-called &amp;quot;menstrual police&amp;quot;, and the legal age of marriage was
lowered to 15. It is against this background that Gabita and Otilia embark on their
journey, clearly a perilous one. The tension is cleverly built towards the
eventual, correspondingly traumatic, encounter with the shadowy Mr Bebe (the excellent Vlad
Ivanov) who performs a shockingly basic procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Otilia as
the sympathetic heart of the film is sensible and street-smart. It is her
journey, her personal decisions and experiences, which are documented in
detail. We watch as she secures a hotel room, deals with hostile staff,
negotiates with the cold and repulsive Mr Bebe, wrestles with papers and ID
cards, and accompanies her friend throughout the ordeal. A strong theme of
friendship is threaded throughout the narrative. Otilia risks everything for
Gabita because in an uncertain world, it is the only thing she is sure of.
&amp;quot;She would do the same for me&amp;quot;, she explains in quiet resignation to
her boyfriend when he is shocked at her risk-taking.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The
overwhelmingly isolating impact of the piece comes at the point Otilia has to interact
with others, visiting her boyfriend&amp;#39;s home to celebrate his mother&amp;#39;s birthday. One
of the few times that the relentlessly austere atmosphere is allowed to drop,
the family home is full of laughter, light, books and good food. Parents and friends
joke together about mutual acquaintances, successes and careers. Yet Otilia sits
sandwiched between guests, unable to speak or eat. As the conversation carries
on around her, the camera remains fixed with her front and centre, and we know
all her thoughts are with Gabita whom she has left alone in the hotel room. It
is intensely poignant, and a powerful portrait of utter isolation. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;An unforgiving world&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As the day
unravels, Mungiu reveals an unforgiving world with its own distinct set of
corrupted, yet strictly defined, structures. Everything in this world is for
sale; shampoo, soap and Kent cigarettes in the student dormitories or on the
black market run out of the downtown hotel lobbies, and finally - somehow
inevitably - the girls themselves. Mr Bebe&amp;#39;s demands for payment in any form confirm
the total corruption of society.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;/files/Otilia_Reflection.jpg&quot; border=&quot;2&quot; alt=&quot;Otilia&quot; title=&quot;Otilia&quot; hspace=&quot;10&quot; vspace=&quot;5&quot; width=&quot;433&quot; height=&quot;243&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; /&gt; All this,
though, happens very quietly and very naturally. There is virtually no music
throughout, the silent backdrop broken only by the overheard sounds of a
wedding party at the hotel. In some ways this reflects on the fragmentation of
life under the regime. There could be hundreds, thousands of Otilias and
Gabitas making similar choices, being exposed to the same inevitable
brutalities and similarly enduring the ordeal in silence and secrecy.  
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Here again,
the closing words of the film are revealing: &amp;quot;We will not speak of this
again&amp;quot;, Otilia tells Gabita. And they won&amp;#39;t. That is of course Mungiu&amp;#39;s
job, to relate the stories of ordinary people living their lives in times of
misfortune.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Mungiu&amp;#39;s
success proves him a master of his craft, underlined by the film&amp;#39;s winning of
the Palme D&amp;#39;Or at the 2007 Cannes
film festival. The acting is superb, the restrained camerawork and naturalistic
direction capture a real sense of time and place. And it does not flinch from the
tough subject matter. Moreover, it deals with it in the context of a very
specific set of circumstances which have informed national attitudes in a
singular way. At the fall of the regime it was estimated that up to 500,000
women in Romania
had died as a result of the ban on abortion on demand. The political motivations
behind the ban also provoked an added significance; for some, it transformed
abortion into an act of rebellion. In post-Communist Romania abortion was legalised,
resulting in almost 1 million abortions in one year alone. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Rooted in a
particular time and place that is alien to most, &lt;em&gt;4 Months, 3 Weeks &amp;amp; 2 Days&lt;/em&gt; manages to both evoke the horror of
the era it depicts, and simultaneously provide evidence, in itself, of Romania&amp;#39;s
progress. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Perhaps due
to the focus on children, the relative closeness to home, and my age at the
time, the tragedy of Romania&amp;#39;s
unwanted children remains a strong personal memory, one of the first times my
political consciousness had been stirred. Nearly twenty years later, the
experience of that era has been transformed into art, and art at its very best,
with the ability to provoke questions and understanding at a deeper level.
Mungiu, and others, will tell us those everyday stories - if we are prepared to
listen.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;rating-item&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;rating&quot; id=&quot;rating_mean_36004&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;rating-intro&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;rating-intro-text&quot;&gt;Average rating&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;star avg on&quot;&gt;&lt;a style=&quot;width: 100%;&quot; onclick=&quot;return false;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;star avg on&quot;&gt;&lt;a style=&quot;width: 100%;&quot; onclick=&quot;return false;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;star avg on&quot;&gt;&lt;a style=&quot;width: 100%;&quot; onclick=&quot;return false;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;star avg on&quot;&gt;&lt;a style=&quot;width: 100%;&quot; onclick=&quot;return false;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;star avg&quot;&gt;&lt;a style=&quot;width: 100%;&quot; onclick=&quot;return false;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;num-votes&quot;&gt;(&lt;span id=&quot;rating_num_votes_36004&quot;&gt;3&lt;/span&gt; votes)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;form action=&quot;/crss/node/36004&quot;  method=&quot;post&quot; id=&quot;rating_form_36004&quot; class=&quot;rating&quot; title=&quot;Rating: 0.0&quot;&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;rating_options_36004&quot;&gt;Rate this: &lt;/label&gt;
 &lt;select name=&quot;edit[rating]&quot; class=&quot;form-select rating-options&quot; title=&quot;Rate this&quot; id=&quot;rating_options_36004&quot; &gt;&lt;option value=&quot;0&quot; selected=&quot;selected&quot;&gt;---&lt;/option&gt;&lt;option value=&quot;100&quot;&gt;Excellent!&lt;/option&gt;&lt;option value=&quot;80&quot;&gt;Great!&lt;/option&gt;&lt;option value=&quot;60&quot;&gt;Good&lt;/option&gt;&lt;option value=&quot;40&quot;&gt;Quite good&lt;/option&gt;&lt;option value=&quot;20&quot;&gt;Not so great&lt;/option&gt;&lt;/select&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[nid]&quot; id=&quot;edit-nid&quot; value=&quot;36004&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot; name=&quot;op&quot; value=&quot;Submit&quot;  class=&quot;form-submit&quot; /&gt;
&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[form_id]&quot; id=&quot;edit-rating-form-36004&quot; value=&quot;rating_form_36004&quot;  /&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/form&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/5050/arts_cultures/4months_3weeks_2days#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-fifty/debate.jsp">50.50</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/editorial_tags/arts_cultures">arts &amp;amp; cultures</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/taxonomy/term/51">Creative Commons normal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/arts-Film/debate.jsp">film</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/taxonomy/term/963">Grace Davies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/editorial_tags/international_womens_day">international women&amp;#039;s day</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Grace Davies</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">36004 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
