<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - China&amp;#039;s soft-power failure, Li Datong  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/china_inside/chinas-soft-power-failure</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;China&#039;s soft-power failure, Li Datong &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>arnaldog on &quot;China&#039;s soft-power failure&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/china_inside/chinas-soft-power-failure#comment-462168</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with Li Datong that the closing Olimpics will provide everyone some guidance on what are the full intentions of Chinese government and CCP leadership. It is to be proved if the CPG extracts the wise lessons from the humanitarian crisis of Sichuan and use it as leverage to unite the Chinese people and make more transparent and accountable its leadership. China needs in a rawlsian sense a social contract that defines, clearly, the relation between rulers and the people. Ideology has fade away, but Western liberalism seems hardly the path for China have the necessary combine between tradition and modernity, order and openess, respect and plurality. A new mix is necessary based in Chinese traditions and the responsabilities China is asked to perform in world stage. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 09:24:27 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>arnaldog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 462168 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Johannes Adamsen on &quot;China&#039;s soft-power failure&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/china_inside/chinas-soft-power-failure#comment-462029</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
I really appreciate openDemocracy&amp;#39;s Li Datong, but this time I miss something in the argument.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I simply find it difficult to comprehend just why China was given the possibilitiy to host the games only a little more than one year after the crackdown on Falun Gong in 1999, cf Maria Hsia Chang, &lt;em&gt;Falun Gong. The End of Days&lt;/em&gt;, Yale University Press 2004. This could hardly be interpreted as a straight line of bettering on human rights records since Tiananmen 1989. I&amp;#39;ll be delighted to have Li Datong commenting on that.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Is it due to a underreporting of what went on in China in those months in 1999? Or should we just suppose that the International Olympic Comitee is out of tune with the world - when it does not concern money at least?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:51:25 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Johannes Adamsen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 462029 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>China&#039;s soft-power failure, Li Datong </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/china_inside/chinas-soft-power-failure</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The Chinese government planned the year of the Olympic games in Beijing on 8-24 August 2008 as a demonstration of the country&amp;#39;s pride and confidence on the global stage. So far, it has not turned out that way. The Tibet protests in mid-March, and the disruption of the Olympic-torch relay that followed, have created confusion in government circles. Now, the earthquake in Sichuan on 12 May has presented the authorities with another severe &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/dbc.nsf/doc108?OpenForm&amp;amp;emid=EQ-2008-000062-CHN&amp;amp;rc=3&quot;&gt;challenge&lt;/a&gt; of management and public relations. A triumphal year is becoming ever more tense. 
&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/china_inside/chinas-soft-power-failure&quot; class=&quot;read-more&quot; title=&quot;Read the rest of this posting.&quot;&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/china_inside/chinas-soft-power-failure&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/china_inside/chinas-soft-power-failure#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/people-china/debate.jsp">china</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/columns/china_inside.jsp">china from the inside</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/taxonomy/term/51">Creative Commons normal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/taxonomy/term/1341">Li Datong</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/editorial_tags/tibet_2008">Tibet (2008)</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:06:08 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">44633 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
