<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - Solidarity with the Irish No, Hugo Robinson  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/ourkingdom-theme/hugo-robinson/2008/06/19/solidarity-with-the-irish-no</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Solidarity with the Irish No, Hugo Robinson &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Solidarity with the Irish No, Hugo Robinson </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/ourkingdom-theme/hugo-robinson/2008/06/19/solidarity-with-the-irish-no</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Hugo Robinson (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.openeurope.org.uk/&quot;&gt;Open Europe&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;/strong&gt; The Irish people have voted down the EU&amp;#39;s Lisbon Treaty. The EU&amp;#39;s rules are clear - if any one member state rejects an EU Treaty, the Treaty falls. It seems pretty simple - Lisbon should be dead.&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Yet yesterday evening, the House of Lords rubber stamped the Treaty. The
only explanation for this continuation of the ratification process is
that it is a means to isolate and pressurise the Irish, with a view to
reversing the referendum decision.  Keeping the legislative process in motion reflects
a presumption that the Irish will be talked out of their rejection -
because otherwise, ratification is pointless.  
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Surely the only way to
truly &amp;quot;respect&amp;quot; the result of the referendum - as EU leaders keep
saying they will - is not to have the Treaty at all? The end result of pushing ahead with ratification would be a situation where 26 member states have approved the Treaty, and Ireland has not - making the pressure of isolation far more tangible than is the case now, where eight countries (excluding Ireland) are yet to ratify.&lt;!--break--&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The
contrast with 2005, when the French and Dutch rejected the original
version of the EU Constitution, could not be greater. Apparently, when
large countries vote No, their views are entitled to respect; when
small countries vote no, they are to be treated with contempt. &amp;quot;A few million Irish cannot decide on behalf of 495 million Europeans,&amp;quot; opined German Interior Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble. &amp;quot;I don&amp;#39;t think you can say the treaty of Lisbon is dead even if the ratification process will be delayed&amp;quot; insisted Jean-Pierre Jouyet, French secretary of state for European affairs. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Not
only is this profoundly anti-democratic. It undermines the fundamental
basis of the EU as an international system that must ultimately rest on
the rule of law. If the EU both ignores the verdict of citizens in
three separate referendums and overrides its own laws, it is
simultaneously undermining its own legal and democratic legitimacy. EU elites do not seem to have grasped that there is a profound disconnect between their aspirations for Europe and those of their electorates, and that such reckless pursuit of integration by stealth will damage the EU in the long term.  As Gideon Rachman at the FT argued &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.ft.com/rachmanblog/2008/06/column-ireland%25e2%2580%2599s-bold-blow-for-democracy/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;yesterday&lt;/a&gt;, and Bruno Waterfield of the Telegraph argues &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/foreign/brunowaterfield/june2008/irishreferendumnomeps.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;today&lt;/a&gt;,
there is a clear trend of Europe sliding from democracy towards
technocracy, with decision-making power gradually being transferred
away from voters towards self-selecting and self-serving experts. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Open Europe has launched a &lt;a href=&quot;http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/&quot;&gt;petition&lt;/a&gt; on the Downing Street website calling on Gordon Brown to respect the Irish No, and stop the ratification process of the Lisbon Treaty.   We have been heartened by the response from UK
voters: the petition has become the fastest growing yet, with more than
17,000 people signing up. During this short period the petition has
become the third most popular on the website.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
There
is a growing political constituency across the continent which is not
prepared to accept an increasingly top-down, centralised and
unaccountable EU. The Union has for too long has been driven forward by a narrow establishment, imbued with a deterministic belief that irreversible integration is commensurate with their vision of progress. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Perhaps now the tide is turning. Ordinary people are beginning to mobilise to tell politicians that this time No must mean No. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
To sign our petition, click on the link below: 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/ourkingdom-theme/hugo-robinson/2008/06/19/solidarity-with-the-irish-no#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/themes/ourkingdom-theme">OurKingdom</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom_6">OurKingdom</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/ok-tags/eu">EU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/authors/hugo-robinson">Hugo Robinson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/ok-tags/lisbon-treaty">Lisbon Treaty</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom">OurKingdom</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Hugo Robinson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">45099 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
