<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - The contours of an Obama foreign policy, Kanishk Tharoor  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/usa/blog/kanishk_tharoor/obama_foreign_policy_walzer</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;The contours of an Obama foreign policy, Kanishk Tharoor &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The contours of an Obama foreign policy, Kanishk Tharoor </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/usa/blog/kanishk_tharoor/obama_foreign_policy_walzer</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Michael Walzer, the American political philosopher, breaks down the dimensions of the foreign policy of a prospective Obama administration at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.resetdoc.org/EN/Walzer-Obama.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;Dialogues on Civilisations&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; conference in Istanbul. There&amp;#39;s nothing particularly new here - more multilateralism, more engagement with international institutions (like the International Criminal Court) and processes (a return to Kyoto), a change of focus from Iraq to Afghanistan, etc. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Some of Walzer&amp;#39;s predictions are too hopeful. He expects more emphasis on workers&amp;#39; rights and environmental protection in trade negotiations, which, given the chip-off-the-old-block economic advisors surrounding Obama, is wishful indeed. Washington also has miles to go before its current martial stance on the &amp;quot;war on terror&amp;quot; is softened to the more old world &amp;quot;criminal justice&amp;quot; approach.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Changes in degree rather than in nature, perhaps, but welcome changes indeed after the Bush administration&amp;#39;s plodding and blundering track record of international engagement. But is it enough? As Walzer perceptively concludes: 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
	America has less power and a diminished authority today compared to
	the Clinton years. And the world is even more recalcitrant now than it
	was then. A different American foreign policy, that I have just
	described, may not make a big difference, and it won’t make a big
	difference unless it is accompanied/supported by different policies in
	other parts of the world.  
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As this blog has frequently pointed out, the supposed &amp;quot;epochal moment&amp;quot; of Obama&amp;#39;s rise is shrouded by &lt;a href=&quot;/usa/blog/kanishk_tharoor/league_of_democracies&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;substantial shifts&lt;/a&gt; in global geopolitics, an &amp;quot;epochal moment&amp;quot; of sorts above and beyond the US. The true test of either an Obama or McCain foreign policy will lie in how Washington comes to grips with a political landscape in which the confidence and bluster of US campaign rhetoric sounds hollower than ever before.
&lt;!--break--&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/usa/blog/kanishk_tharoor/obama_foreign_policy_walzer#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/themes/openusa-theme">openUSA-theme</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog_terms/election">election</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog-terms/foreign-policy">foreign policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/taxonomy/term/1273">Kanishk Tharoor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog_terms/obama">Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/openusa">openUSA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/usa">USA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog_terms/usa">USA</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kanishk Tharoor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">45393 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
