<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - Pandering to the middle?, openUSA  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/usa/blog/obama_navasky_middle</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Pandering to the middle?, openUSA &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Pandering to the middle?, openUSA </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/usa/blog/obama_navasky_middle</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The Nation&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080901/navasky&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Victor Navasky&lt;/a&gt; pens an excellent piece on the missteps of Obama&amp;#39;s campaign since his defeating Hillary Clinton. Obama risks aping the failures of John Kerry if he frets too much about the &amp;quot;illusory middle&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
	His mistake is the same one that the last two Democratic candidates for
	President--Gore and Kerry--made. The assumption (shared by too many
	campaign consultants) that the way to woo those in the center is to move
	towards the center. Arianna Huffington, I believe, has a point when she
	advises, &amp;quot;Instead of targeting the swing voters he should target the
	unlikely voters.&amp;quot; But I would argue there&amp;#39;s nothing wrong with
	targeting the swing voters. What&amp;#39;s wrong is to pander to them on the
	assumption that the way to win them over is to move towards the center.
	&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
	The reason they are undecided is precisely because they are not
	Democrats or Republicans, and they don&amp;#39;t care about left vs. right.
	They care about finding someone they can connect with, a candidate they
	can trust. And as soon as they see a candidate who appears to be
	listening to his consultants and pollsters rather than being true to
	himself, they see a candidate who has betrayed what they care about
	most: authenticity.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
During the pageantry of the Convention, will Obama continue to make that pitch to the &amp;quot;centre&amp;quot;? Or from the bosom of the Democratic Party, will Obama speak from a position of strength and on his own terms?
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/usa/blog/obama_navasky_middle#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/themes/openusa-theme">openUSA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog_terms/election">election</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog_terms/obama">Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/usa">openUSA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/openusa">openUSA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/authors/openusa">openUSA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog_terms/usa">USA</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>openUSA</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">46017 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
