<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - Media reactions: Biden wins, and so does Palin, Dennis Nottebaum  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/openusa-theme/d-nottebaum/2008/10/03/media-reactions-biden-wins-and-so-does-palin-0</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Media reactions: Biden wins, and so does Palin, Dennis Nottebaum &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Janet Greene on &quot;Media reactions: Biden wins, and so does Palin&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/openusa-theme/d-nottebaum/2008/10/03/media-reactions-biden-wins-and-so-does-palin-0#comment-476934</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Isn&#039;t &quot;folksy&quot; a euphamism for &quot;uneducated&quot;, &quot;uninformed&quot;, and &quot;can&#039;t pronounce her g&#039;s at the end of a word)? Since when are these positive attributes of a VP?  Do people really think that if this woman cannot form a proper sentence, she UNDERSTANDS people better?  This woman has proven to be OUT FOR HERSELF in Alaska.  She appears power hungry and utterly without wisdom in her decisions.  She built an expensive hockey rink when roads were crumbling; she tried to fire the librarian for not censoring books; she made rape victims pay for their own rape kits; no sex education ( a recipe for increased HIV &amp;amp; pregancy rates), and endorses KILLING WOLVES from planes (there&#039;s a disturbing youtube video of this - check it out) - she calls this &quot;pest control&quot;.  I call keeping this woman OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE pest control.  What has our country sunk to?  Incredible.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:54:28 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Janet Greene</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 476934 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Media reactions: Biden wins, and so does Palin, Dennis Nottebaum </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/openusa-theme/d-nottebaum/2008/10/03/media-reactions-biden-wins-and-so-does-palin-0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The long-anticipated clash of the VP candidates did not turn out to be
the Palin Fry Fest that many commentators anticipated. She ignored
questions, bewildered with her monologues and looked shaky on foreign policy -
but that was to be expected. She slipped but did not fall. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/03/us/politics/03watch.html?_r=1&amp;amp;hp&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;It
was a 90-minute sprint to reclaim her identity as a feisty, folksy
frontierswoman ready to storm Washington.&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; Many pundits have claimed a victory for Palin. However, especially in the European media, Biden is hailed as the winner.
Palin&amp;#39;s folksy appeal obviously does not extent beyond the Atlantic.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;!--break--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Daniel Finkelstein of the &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://timesonline.typepad.com/comment/2008/10/the-conventiona.html&quot;&gt;Times &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;claims that by not winning the debate, Palin lost for the McCain campaign:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;McCain&amp;#39;s only hope is to shock the race somehow. He succeeded in doing it at
the convention. He tried and failed during the bailout crisis. But there aren&amp;#39;t
very many opportunities to repeat the trick and last night was one of those. It
was a long shot, but still a shot. So Sarah Palin needed to win last night. Of
course Republicans feared disaster, but avoiding disaster wasn&amp;#39;t enough.
Avoiding disaster means the race goes on smoothly and serenely. And if it does
that, Obama wins. So by not losing Biden won.&amp;quot; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Marc Pitzke of Germany&amp;#39;s &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,582062,00.html&quot;&gt;Der Spiegel &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;credits Biden for his strategy of not tearing Palin into pieces over foreign policy: &amp;quot;Biden, who could have ruthlessly picked her arguments to
pieces, spared her and directed his attacks at McCain.&amp;quot; He goes on to draw the
line from Palin to the Bush administration: &amp;quot;The barrage of words was often
unrelated to the question at hand. And Palin was proud: &amp;#39;I may not answer
the question that either moderator or you want to hear but I&amp;#39;m going to talk
straight to the American people,&amp;#39; she said. This exceptionally brazen
comment, which was buried in the flood of words, recalled the rigid stance of
the Bush administration: We don&amp;#39;t give a damn about rules.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Patrick Healy of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/10/03/america/debate.php&quot;&gt;International Herald Tribune&lt;/a&gt; is particularly uneasy about Palin&amp;#39;s avoidance of questions:
&amp;quot;Palin also tended to seize on a single point or phrase of Biden or the
moderator, Gwen Ifill of PBS, and veer off on her own direction in her
90-second answer. Asked whether the poor economy would cause McCain to cut his
spending plans, Palin picked up on Biden&amp;#39;s discussion of energy to rail against
Obama&amp;#39;s positions on energy and talk about her fights against oil companies in
Alaska.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Finally, Svein Melby, head of the Centre for Transatlantic Studies at the
University of Oslo, goes into the same direction and compares Palin to an
automatic answering machine in Norway&amp;#39;s &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/uriks/usavalg/article2690280.ece&quot;&gt;Aftenposten&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The right-wing media on the left side of the pond credits Palin for her &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/642oflyc.asp&quot;&gt;down-to-earth
appeal&lt;/a&gt; and praise her &lt;a href=&quot;http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/10/02/vpdebate_1002/&quot;&gt;rehabilitation &lt;/a&gt;after the disastrous Couric interview. One can almost smell the sweet &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic&quot; class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot;&gt;odeur&lt;/span&gt; of relief in the Republican blogosphere. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The major US broadsheets differ greatly in their assessments of the debate: &lt;a href=&quot;http://nytimes.com/2008/10/03/opinion/03fri1.html?hp&quot;&gt;The New York Times&lt;/a&gt;
said that &amp;quot;the debate did not change the essential truth of Ms. Palin&amp;#39;s
candidacy: Mr. McCain made a wildly irresponsible choice that shattered the
image he created for himself as the honest, seasoned, experienced man of
principle and judgment. It was either an act of incredible cynicism or
appallingly bad judgment.&amp;quot; On the contrary, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://wsj.com/article/SB122300588457301501.html&quot;&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/a&gt;
believed Palin &amp;quot;more than held her own&amp;quot; in debating foreign policy
and had proved herself &amp;quot;worthy of the national stage.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/openusa-theme/d-nottebaum/2008/10/03/media-reactions-biden-wins-and-so-does-palin-0#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/include-in-email/yes">email</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/themes/openusa-theme">openUSA-theme</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/openusa">openUSA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/usa">USA</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:16:18 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>d.nottebaum</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">46415 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
