Thomas Ash on "NYT comes out against electoral college"

Thomas Ash — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:08:44 +0000

I'm glad to hear they know where to take their cues from...

NYT comes out against electoral college, Kanishk Tharoor

Kanishk Tharoor — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:17:39 +0000

Following in our footsteps, a New York Times editorial today forcefully argues for the abolition of the electoral college in favour of the popular vote. There are numerous reasons to dispense with the creaking, archaic system: much of the initial rationale of the system lay in slavery; it is unconscionable that the presidency can be awarded to the candidate for whom fewer Americans vote (as happened in 2000); and the electoral college exaggerates the importance of votes in "swing states" like Ohio and Florida, while diminishing their significance in "safe states" like New York and Texas.

But most importantly, in my opinion, the system reduces the diverse political landscape of the country into monochrome blocks. It creates the crippling sense of a "red state" vs "blue state" divide. If a popular vote was in place, this perception would not have room to flourish. As the editorial points out, over 40% of voters in deep red Alabama cast their ballot for Obama, while 4.5 million Californians voted for McCain (equivalent to the number of votes the Republican got in Texas). If Obama is serious about transcending red-blue fissures, he should welcome the burgeoning national movement for the popular vote.

open Democracy News Analysis - NYT comes out against electoral college, Kanishk Tharoor - Comments

Thomas Ash on "NYT comes out against electoral college"

NYT comes out against electoral college, Kanishk Tharoor