<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - Shiller wants financial advisors who don&amp;#039;t shill, Tony Curzon Price  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/economics/tony-curzon-price/2008/11/27/shillers-no-shill-solution</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Shiller wants financial advisors who don&#039;t shill, Tony Curzon Price &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Lawrence Efana on &quot;Shiller&#039;s &#039;no shill&#039; solution&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/economics/tony-curzon-price/2008/11/27/shillers-no-shill-solution#comment-483070</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Would it not serve oD&amp;#39;s comments - innovating the endeavours as a culture: where deemed fit in the jungle of advisory mission-craves? Or is it that one misunderstands?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lawrence Efana</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 483070 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Shiller wants financial advisors who don&#039;t shill, Tony Curzon Price </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/economics/tony-curzon-price/2008/11/27/shillers-no-shill-solution</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.econ.yale.edu/~shiller/&quot;&gt;Robert Shiller&lt;/a&gt; was at London&amp;#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ippr.org.uk/pressreleases/?id=517&quot;&gt;ippr&lt;/a&gt; talking about the subprime crisis and another prescient book of his:
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8714.html&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://s3.amazonaws.com/scrnshots.com/screenshots/90050/ScrnShotsDesktop-1227799474_large.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; 
Of many fascinating things he said, three stood out:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
1. that there should be publicly funded financial advisors who are not also selling products. As he said, only the rich get real advice about financial products. Imagine, he said, a world in which we had only drugs companies and no doctors ... This is what we have when it comes to financial health.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This is an application of Lessig&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;no shill&amp;quot; principle---this times proposed by Shiller about our shillings:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://lessig.org/blog/2007/06/disclosure_statement_and_state.html&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://s3.amazonaws.com/scrnshots.com/screenshots/90054/ScrnShotsDesktop-1227800557_large.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
2. a New Deal is not a return to the Old &amp;quot;New Deal&amp;quot;: we have to realise that economic policy, especially in such extreme circumstances, works on animal spirits. And the new spirit that the New Deal ushered in cannot be ushered in by copying the policies. We need to implement policies -- including reflationary policies -- that make sense in the context of the next 100 years, not in the context of the next 100 days. Thinking about 100 days will not change the animal spirits ... indeed quite the opposite.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
3. (... and this followed from a question I asked him prompted by &amp;quot;2&amp;quot;): Economists have to become more like Keynes: an understanding of animal spirits requires an understadning of sociology, history, psychology, and responsible economists are one who will integrate all of these in policy pronouncements. He said something like: &amp;quot;I did not become a theoretical physicist. Many economists wish they were theoretical physicists. I admire theoretical physicists. But our responsibility is to understand the wider world.&amp;quot;
Bloomberg apparently video&amp;#39;d the event. I&amp;#39;ll post a link to it if I find it on the free side of their web site.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Since Shiller seems so good at timing his books with great prescience, I think it is important to know that he has a book with &lt;a href=&quot;http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~akerlof/&quot;&gt;George Akerlof&lt;/a&gt; on Animal Spirits coming out in March that will be talking about sociology in economics. Now, we just need to work out why that will have been so prescient...
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/economics/tony-curzon-price/2008/11/27/shillers-no-shill-solution#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/include-in-email/yes">email</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/themes/economics">economics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/od_today">oD Today</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/section/economics">economics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/taxonomy/term/2125">Tony Curzon Price</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tony Curzon Price</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">46886 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
