<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - Molehunt doesn&amp;#039;t justify breach of privilege, Tom Griffin  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/ourkingdom-theme/tom-griffin/2008/11/29/molehunt-doesnt-justify-breach-of-privilege</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Molehunt doesn&#039;t justify breach of privilege, Tom Griffin &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Leaser on &quot;Molehunt doesn&#039;t justify breach of privilege&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/ourkingdom-theme/tom-griffin/2008/11/29/molehunt-doesnt-justify-breach-of-privilege#comment-485733</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Looks to me like any information obtained from the office of Green or his phone records without his approval and without a warrant will be inadmissible as evidence of anything, since such information has been obtained illegally and in breach of Green&#039;s privacy!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Leaser</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 485733 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Molehunt doesn&#039;t justify breach of privilege, Tom Griffin </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/ourkingdom-theme/tom-griffin/2008/11/29/molehunt-doesnt-justify-breach-of-privilege</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Tom Griffin (London, &lt;a href=&quot;/ourkingdom&quot;&gt;OK&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/strong&gt;: I spoke to a civil servant yesterday who was very bullish in support of the police&amp;#39;s decision to arrest Damian Green.  According to their version of events, documents were being leaked systematically by a woman with links to the Conservative Party who was employed as cover for another member of staff. It looks as if &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/mick_fealty/blog/2008/11/28/damian_green_arrest_parliament_freedom_of_conscience_and_trojan_horses&quot;&gt;Mick Fealty&lt;/a&gt; has heard a similar account.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
	If, for instance, Mr Green had someone in the Home Office who seemed to be less motivated by a desire to expose corruption, and more by a determination to run an anti-government campaign from within a government department, it would be a different matter - particularly if 	Mr Green knew this to be the case.
	&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
	If, for instance, this person was leaking other material to other senior Conservative spokesmen, for example - or worse still, if this person had some sort of record of Conservative activism - then it really would be a problem.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;!--break--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Such partisan leaking is no doubt wrong, but it wouldn&amp;#39;t nullify &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/ourkingdom-theme/anthony-barnett/2008/11/28/one-reason-why-the-are-police-dangerous-undemocratic-and-stupid&quot;&gt;the concerns raised by Anthony Barnett&lt;/a&gt; below. The prospect of the police &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/lawreports/joshuarozenberg/3534362/Why-Tory-MP-was-arrested.html&quot;&gt;rifling through Green&amp;#39;s files and hard drives&lt;/a&gt; is bound to have a chilling effect not just on potential future whistleblowers, but on MPs themselves and their constituents.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Further to my &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/email/tom-griffin/2008/11/28/damian-green-blog-reactions&quot;&gt;blog round-up&lt;/a&gt; below here are a few more reactions:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;FT Economist &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.ft.com/maverecon/2008/11/another-poke-in-the-eye-for-freedom/&quot;&gt;Willem Buiter&lt;/a&gt; thinks the arrest is &amp;#39;a further reminder of just how assiduously the British government has been chipping away at our freedom.&amp;#39;  &lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nextleft.org/2008/11/broad-consensus-on-green-arrest.html&quot;&gt;Sunder Katwala&lt;/a&gt; points to the parallels with the case of Mark Kearney and Sally Murrer, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article5254372.ece&quot;&gt;acquitted yesterday&lt;/a&gt; of the same offence that Green is accused of.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2008/nov/29/1&quot;&gt;Roy Greenslade&lt;/a&gt; blogs the uniformly negative press reaction to the decision to arrest Green. &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/ourkingdom-theme/tom-griffin/2008/11/29/molehunt-doesnt-justify-breach-of-privilege#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/themes/ourkingdom-theme">OurKingdom</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom_6">OurKingdom</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom">OurKingdom</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/ok-tags/parliament">Parliament</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/ok-tags/police">Police</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/authors/tom-griffin">Tom Griffin</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 14:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Griffin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">46907 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
