<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - Maternal Health Sidelined in Uruguay,  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/sara-mojtehedzadeh/2008/11/29/maternal-health-sidelined-in-uruguay</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Maternal Health Sidelined in Uruguay, &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Maternal Health Sidelined in Uruguay, </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/sara-mojtehedzadeh/2008/11/29/maternal-health-sidelined-in-uruguay</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Almost
800,000 Latin American women die each year from medical hazards associated with
abortion, and fatalities resulting from the procedure make up 17 percent of all
maternal deaths in the region.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
To
the disappointment of many women&amp;#39;s rights activists, President Tabaré Vasquez
of Uruguay
vetoed a bill to legalize abortion last week. The bill, part of a larger
document on sexual health and reproductive rights, would have decriminalized
abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy. The bill was approved by the
parliament and senate, and recent polls indicate that 63 percent of the
population in Uruguay
supported the proposed legislation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
President
Vasquez, leader of the left wing coalition Frente Amplio and a former
oncologist, said that he disagreed with the bill on both &amp;quot;philosophical and
biological&amp;quot; grounds. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Currently,
Uruguayan women can only legally obtain abortions if they have been raped or if
the pregnancy endangers their lives. 
According to a 1938 law, women who have abortions under any other
circumstances are liable to serve up to nine months in prison. Doctors who
perform the procedure may face a sentence of six to twenty four months. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Abortions
are illegal throughout most of Latin America, with the exception of Cuba and Mexico
City. Nonetheless, an estimated 3.7 million women in Latin America have clandestine abortions every year. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Abortion
is a multi-layered issue interwoven with themes of gender discrimination,
culture, and religion. While many gender activists in Latin
America argue that abortion is part of women&amp;#39;s fundamental rights
to health and security of person, the region&amp;#39;s strong Catholic tradition
militates against abortion&amp;#39;s legalization. Many Latin American doctors are
against abortion and have been known to report their patients to the
authorities after surgeries where complications have arisen.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Yet
the criminalization of abortion multiplies the risks involved, often forcing
women to seek help from untrained practitioners in unsanitary conditions. Cross
cutting the problem of medical safety is the issue of socio-economic
inequality. While most middle or upper class women in Latin
America can obtain safe abortions in spite of legislation, poor
women generally cannot.  
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According
to the Human Development Index and Gender Development Index, inequality is
relatively low in Uruguay
compared to most Latin American countries. 
But socio-economic disparities and gender discrimination continue to
plague Uruguayan society. In a report issued earlier this month, the Committee
on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women expressed its concern over
high incidences of teen pregnancy and maternal mortality in Uruguay.  CEDAW also cited high secondary school drop
out rates, low public participation and under/unemployment as severe problems
for Uruguayan women -  especially those
of rural background or African descent. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Upon
vetoing the bill to legalize abortion in Uruguay, President Vasquez argued
that &amp;quot;it is more appropriate to look for a solution based on solidarity, giving
a woman the freedom to make other choices and thereby save both her and the
baby.&amp;quot; Yet when access to education or health care is limited - as it
often is for poor or rural women - making informed choices about reproductive
health is difficult. Mr. Vasquez&amp;#39;s veto reflects both a denial of the
structural inequalities that impact women&amp;#39;s personal security and health, and a
negation of women&amp;#39;s right to control over their bodies. For a country which,
according to CEDAW, has made important strides toward ending gender
discrimination, the veto is a disappointing retreat from the principles of
equality and justice. 
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/sara-mojtehedzadeh/2008/11/29/maternal-health-sidelined-in-uruguay#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/section/50-50">50.50</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/authors/sara-mojtehedzadeh">Sara Mojtehedzadeh</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/5050">5050</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sara Mojtehedzadeh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">46908 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
