<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - A Lib-Lab pact?, Tom Griffin  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/email/tom-griffin/2009/01/03/a-lib-lab-pact</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;A Lib-Lab pact?, Tom Griffin &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Toque on &quot;A Lib-Lab pact?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/email/tom-griffin/2009/01/03/a-lib-lab-pact#comment-489049</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Clegg is a fool, but probably not fool enough to enter into another pact with the devil.  Still, if PR is put on the table (again) then maybe they will take the bait.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Personally I&amp;#39;d like to see it.  A Lib/Lab pact will make worse the WLQ, and it might yet make English nationalists out of the Tories who still haven&amp;#39;t convinced me that they are even remotely worth voting for. It will also alter the dynamic in Scottish and Welsh politics.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Toque</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 489049 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>douglas clark on &quot;A Lib-Lab pact?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/email/tom-griffin/2009/01/03/a-lib-lab-pact#comment-488922</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Tom,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Knock me down with a feather, but I think this is extremely unlikely. Flirtation? Possibly. True love? No way.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Clegg is not a fool.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;#160;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;#160;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;#160;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 06:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 488922 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Lib-Lab pact?, Tom Griffin </title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/email/tom-griffin/2009/01/03/a-lib-lab-pact</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Tom Griffin (London, &lt;a href=&quot;/ourkingdom&quot;&gt;OK&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/strong&gt;: Today&amp;#39;s Daily Mail brings us &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1104524/PETER-OBORNE-Ditch-Speaker-Martin-make-Vince-Cable-Chancellor-freeze-Tories--Browns-masterplan-2009.html&quot;&gt;Peter Oborne&amp;#39;s take&lt;/a&gt; on the emerging theme of a &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/ourkingdom-theme/anthony-barnett/2008/12/31/a-government-of-national-conspiracy&quot;&gt;government of national unity&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
	Of course, the Prime Minister does not envisage an alliance with David Cameron&amp;#39;s Tories. However, he is seriously toying with the idea of bringing the Liberal Democrats into a possible coalition. Private discussions  -  all, of course, totally deniable  -  are taking place secretly. 
	&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
	Against this fascinating background, I can reveal that special favours are being offered to the Liberal Democrats. First, there are signs of a deal being thrashed out between Downing Street and the LibDems over the appointment of the next Commons Speaker.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;!--break--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to Oborne, the Lib Dems are split over the possibility of a coalition (which Brown could seek before the next election), with older MPs who could expect preferment, like Vince Cable, Paddy Ashdown and Menzies Campbell, more positive than their younger counterparts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A hint along these lines was detectable in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/debate/article-1102201/Vince-Cables-2009-Almanac-The-battle-survival-tough-companies-bite-dust.html&quot;&gt;Vince Cable&amp;#39;s call&lt;/a&gt; last week for &amp;quot;the political parties to rise above the usual petty, tribal bickering.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
There is good reason for the Lib Dems to be wary however. Nick Clegg will be all too aware that Labour flirted with the idea of a pact during both Paddy Ashdown and Menzies Campbell&amp;#39;s tenures, and his party emerged with little to show for it.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/email/tom-griffin/2009/01/03/a-lib-lab-pact#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/themes/ourkingdom-theme">OurKingdom</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/include-in-email/yes">email</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom_6">OurKingdom</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/ok-tags/labour-party">Labour Party</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/ok-tags/liberal-democrats">Liberal Democrats</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom">OurKingdom</category>
 <category domain="http://www.opendemocracy.net/authors/tom-griffin">Tom Griffin</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Griffin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47094 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
