<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.opendemocracy.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>open Democracy News Analysis - us - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/global_deal/us</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;us&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>aubrey.meyer on &quot;Kerry: we lead, you follow close behind&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/global_deal/kerry_climate#comment-438562</link>
 <description>Kerry - Could do Better


This report shows John Kerry not at his best.

1. - He is correct to call for a contraction of emissions globally and urgently - to zero - for 450ppmv/2-degrees. [see science update below].

2. - He is not correct [or smart] to rebuke Mrs Merkel&#039;s initiative for contraction with convergence. [Even Al Gore &#039;sells it&#039; [C&amp;amp;C] - though its true, he says he &#039;doesn&#039;t buy it&#039;: -
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2007/aug/08/guardiansocietysupplement.greenpolitics] 

[a] you cannot mathematically avoid that if global contraction is in play; 

[b] accelerating convergence relative to contraction is the equity point embedded in the US Senate&#039;s Byrd Hagel Resolution of 1997. BHR was unanimously supported by the US Senate in that year; 

[c] John Kerry was part of GLOBE USA that year and were formally committed to contraction and convergence a year later.

Anyway, this is all words-words-words.

Here is the science/logic update. This was put together at the request of Hilary Benn last month: -
http://www.gci.org.uk/Animations/BENN_C&amp;amp;C_Animation_[Tower_&amp;amp;_Ravens].exe</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>aubrey.meyer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 438562 at http://www.opendemocracy.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
