Quote of the day

Civil society tends to become a sort of artificial reservoir for an endangered species: the democratic intellectual, protected by the international institutions

Syndicate content

Login

Login or Register to be identified in your comments

Email & RSS

Sign up to oD's editorial summaries email:



Add oD to your Netvibes: Add to Netvibes

Embed this article

Want this article on your site? Check our licensing policy and Copy this code into your HTML

View 3 comments

Tony Blair's genius

The British prime minister has replaced real politics with a carefully crafted fiction, says Roger Scruton.

Nobody can doubt that Tony Blair has exhibited extraordinary skill during his time in office since 1 May 1997 - maintaining a strong parliamentary majority even after re-election in 2001 and 2005, holding together a party not known for its internal cohesion, facing down a constant challenge to his leadership from Gordon Brown, and all the while conducting an unpopular war and confronting the growing threat of Islamist terrorism on British soil.

He has made an impression as strong as that made by Margaret Thatcher and, like her, is relinquishing his post (scheduled for 2007, though at a moment still not specified) not because the people have risen against him, but because he has been stabbed in the back by his rivals. Any assessment of his time in office ought to begin by recognising that the Labour Party has never had such a leader - one capable of winning successive elections, and maintaining his party's unity while reshaping it to fit the mould of democratic capitalism.

Roger Scruton is a philosopher, writer, political activist and businessman. His most recent books are Gentle Regrets: Thoughts From a Life (Continuum, 2005) and News from Somewhere: On Settling (Continuum, 2006)

Also by Roger Scruton in openDemocracy:

"Tony Blair and the wrong America" (29 April 2004)

"The hunting debate: a question of democracy" (17 September 2004)

"Power inquiry, public debate" (6 March 2006)

"The great hole of history" (11 September 2006)

Much of this has been achieved by spin - a new force in democratic politics that Blair has made his own. But the spin has worked.

The British people still believe that the Labour Party is less corrupt than the Conservative opposition, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. (The questioning of the prime minister and his senior aides over the relationship between donations to the party and the distribution of honours, and the government's halting of the Serious Fraud Office inquiry into possible bribery attending the al-Yamamah arms deal with Saudi Arabia, are but the latest indications of the culture at the heart of Blair's government).

The British people still think that the Labour Party is the friend of the health service, of the education system and of the social services, despite the fact that all three are in a state of near collapse.

The British people have been prepared to give the Labour Party the benefit of the doubt in those matters which caused their former suspicion - immigration, policing and defence - even though all are attended by serious and evident policy failures.

I think Blair deserves the greatest credit for this. He has replaced real politics with a carefully crafted fiction, a kind of postmodern holograph, in which unreal issues occupy the stage, while the country wobbles unguided to its fate.

It took genius to ensure that at a time when the country was being taken into a wholly new kind of pre-emptive war, the matter would be discussed in parliament for only eighteen hours, all attention being captured by the 220 hours devoted to the issue of fox-hunting.

It was a further stroke of genius to persuade the British people that reform of the House of Lords was necessary in order to democratise our constitution, and then to fill the upper chamber of parliament with a collection of appointed cronies.

And it was with a deft sense of stagecraft that Blair was able to personify a bereaved nation at the death of Princess Diana, to make it appear that this was the greatest spiritual crisis since the abdication of Edward VIII, and to pose as the rightful successor to the fairy crown worn by the late princess.

In these and many other ways Blair has entirely changed the style of British politics. And his success is evident in the fact that the Conservative Party leader David Cameron is now striving to imitate him, conjuring up his own Disneyland visions with which to tempt the British people.

The only problem is that serious matters are looming on the horizon: the imminent implosion of Europe, the Islamist threat, the rise of English nationalism, and a host of other matters that have been driven off the agenda. But then, it is only further proof of Blair's genius that he knows when it is best to step down.

 

Average rating
(6 votes)
further links
read on

Anthony Seldon & Dennis Kavanagh, eds., The Blair Effect, 2001-5 (Cambridge University Press, 2005) US, UK

 
This article is published by Roger Scruton, , and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.

Comments


John Griffin said:



Tue, 2006-12-19 17:27
The missing point from this article is that is not'the Labour Party' that has done this or that, but 'New Labour' who have so diminished the party and demolished any pretentions to democracy (or indeed membership!), much as they have diminished further any remaining semblance of democracy and representativeness in the country generally. It is merely the culmination of the process fired off in the late 70's and onwards by the 'Thatcherites'. To blame or eulogise Blair alone is to pretend the achievement is his - not so by a long way!

owly said:



Wed, 2006-12-20 15:07
This is without question the most sleazy government I can ever remember, but I think the reason why the electorate has largely 'turned a blind eye' to this corruption is down to the way these issues have been presented in the media. By and large most people have their views shaped by television not by broadsheet newspapers. Again, by and large, the journalistic output from the broadcast media is wholly sympathetic to Labour and the government in a way it never was to the Tories. In most newsrooms never a right of centre thought is allowed to be had, dominated as they are by predominately left of centre types who can no longer see another point of view other than their own. So Labour sleaze has been swept under the carpet. Eventually the electorate will say enough is enough.

andrew.jones said:



Sun, 2006-12-24 08:18
Can I suggest that if the British people still think that the Labour Party is the friend of health, education and social services, "despite the fact that all three are in a state of near collapse", that these same people still remember the lack of respect given to these institutions during the Conservative years. If they are collapsing, it is due to central management which Labour seem so misguidedly keen on. Blair has failed the UK in many ways (Iraq, Lords reform and many others) but his instinct is usually excellent (Diana, Northern Ireland, health, education, Pinochet arrest, Africa poverty, minimum wage among many). In comparison to previous governments, I believe him to be no more nor no less sleazy and in comparison to world leader during his time, he stands higher than most.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options

Remember to login to have your comments properly attributed

Login or Register to be identified in your comments