Quote of the day

Mandela neither demanded nor received an entirely unconditional devotion; in power he expected his compatriots to behave as assertive citizens not genuflecting disciples

Tom Lodge

Syndicate content

Login

Login or Register to be identified in your comments

Email & RSS

Sign up to oD's editorial summaries email:



Add oD to your Netvibes: Add to Netvibes

Embed this article

Want this article on your site? Check our licensing policy and Copy this code into your HTML

View 4 comments

Pinochet's death

Augusto Pinochet introduced a fracture in Chilean identity which remains unhealed, writes Jorge Larraín of Alberto Hurtado University.

Pinochet has died. He was a traitor, a systematic abuser of other human beings who got immensely rich in office, just like any other prototypical "banana republic" dictator. Therefore I ought to be happy; he is gone for ever. Yet I am not. It is painful to have to accept that he was never convicted by a Chilean court. This, I am sure, will be argued over forever by his supporters in Chile. Not that they are too numerous or politically articulate, but all the same, some of them are powerful and vocal.

This is why the death of Pinochet makes me reflect on the weaknesses of our democracy, in particular, the miserable failure of our judiciary. If Pinochet had not been detained in Britain, he would not even have been taken to court or if he had, probably most judges would have dismissed the cases against him. Such was the fear he was able to instil in everybody.

Jorge Larraín is a professor in the faculty of social sciences and pro-vice-chancellor at Alberto Hurtado University, Santiago. His books include Identity and Modernity in Latin America (Polity, 2000)

Pinochet's rule was marked by fear from the very beginning. He was absolutely ruthless and systematic in his attempts to eliminate all opposition. He took a personal interest in that horrible task, and was implacable even with members of his own army. Many of them, from rank-and-file soldiers to generals, paid with their own lives for criticising or opposing his procedures.

He divided Chile between the "patriots" (supporters of his regime) and the "internal enemies" (those no longer considered members of the Chilean community). The latter were savagely tortured and killed; or, if allowed to survive, were exiled and not allowed to return, or denied a passport, or deprived of their nationality.

All those who merely supported (or were supposed to have supported) the Unidad Popular (Popular Unity) movement and remained in the country were informed against, watched over, expelled from their jobs, subjected to massive home searches, called "humanoids" (an expression regularly used by Admiral José Toribio Merino, a member of the military junta, to refer to members of the left), and advised to go and live in Cuba.

In short, Pinochet introduced a fracture in the Chilean identity which remains unhealed until today. A new element was added to his notorious brutality. With many of the victims of the military regime, a transgression was carried out which went beyond pure exclusion: what was attempted was to make the most material basis of their identity disappear - their bodies. Not only were they killed, but the regime sought to obliterate their very existence from the national historical memory.

Also on Chilean politics and the Pinochet legacy in openDemocracy:

Geoffrey Bindman, Juan Garces, Isabel Hilton, "Justice in the world's light" (15 June 2001)

Roberto Espíndola, "Chile's new era"
(16 January 2006)

Justin Vogler, "Pinochet: chronicle of a death foretold"
(11 December 2006)

Alan Angell, "The Pinochet Regime in Chile"
(12 December 2006)

There can hardly exist anything more dissolving and threatening for a collective identity than this. More terrifying than mere torture and death, said George Orwell in Nineteen Eighty-Four, is the possibility of manipulating the past by saying that this or that event never happened. If physical elimination and other forms of exclusion inevitably fracture that imagined community which is the nation, the disappearance of people's bodies achieves more: it prevents that fracture from healing, it makes it last in time until today, it becomes an obstacle to the reconstitution of identity.

After sixteen years of democracy and more than thirty-three years from the military coup, one could have imagined some quieting of passions, some sort of forgetfulness, some resumption of normal life. Up to a point, it can be said that this has happened. Some timid steps were taken on both sides to recognise mistakes. People on both sides of the divide have been talking to each other and sometimes cooperating in common enterprises. Even the last commander-in-chief of the army was able to say "never again", and many rightwing politicians have recognised some excesses.

But it suffices for one event like Pinochet's death to occur for the semblance of normality to disappear, and for the emerging structures of reconciliation to be shattered. The popular response to Pinochet´s passing has been astonishing: many thousands of people on the streets burning fires, fighting the police, chanting, singing and rioting, nobody knows for sure to what end. Feelings run very high, the old divisions and frustrations resurface.

It is an awesome spectacle to see how the dictator, even in his death, continues to divide and traumatise the Chileans. My only hope is that this sudden explosion is just temporary and that the reconstruction of a sense of common identity will be able to carry on. But in order for this to happen, most people need to see that truth has come out and justice has been done. The judiciary still has to deliver in this respect.

Sadly, the main culprit will never pay. But at least all the others who hid behind him should be held to account in the near future. Whatever the course of development that Chile democratically decides to follow in the future, its chances of success will partly depend on whether Chileans can overcome that fractured identity which is still present thirty-three years after the military coup, and which has resurfaced with a vengeance on the occasion of Pinochet's death.

Average rating
(3 votes)
further links
read on

Manuel Antonio Garretón, Incomplete Democracy: Political Democratization in Chile and Latin America (University of North Carolina Press, 2003) US, UK

Hugh O'Shaughnessy, Pinochet: the Politics of Torture (Latin American Bureau, 2000) US, UK

 
This article is published by Jorge Larraín, , and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.

Comments


194-609-749-608-996 said:



Tue, 2006-12-12 19:46
Pinochet is Dead!!

10th December 2006

Hang out the flags, ring all the bells

Pull out the organ stops, hear how the loud drum tells

Set all the dogs a barking for his rotten bones.

He's in his coffin and lets have no groans

Put bunting out and let the world make love

Let every aeroplane make victory rolls above

Scribbling on the sky the message, `He is Dead,'

Let policemen throw their helmets overhead.

He was the beast, the bastard, murderer and worse

Upon his grave lets dance and sing a curse

Let noon and midnight, shout and sing this, my song,

He thought his deeds would last forever: He was wrong.

The stars are happy now, so shine out every one;

Polish up the moon, brighten the sun;

Drown sorrow in the ocean, lets look ahead

For now that bastard Pinochet is dead!!

acurry said:



Tue, 2006-12-12 20:58
My wife and I marked the news of Pinochet's death by listening to Victor Jara's songs, in the versions by Paul Hernandez Baker. I mention this because Jorge Larrain's article raises this contrast between the cultural and the physical. I suppose at some level that the soldiers in the the National Stadium believed that destroying Jara would destroy his music and his beliefs; they seemed even to believe that greater cruelty would make this destruction more absolute. But ever since Pinochet was detained by the British government the limits of the physical have been all too apparent, even to Pinochet. Jara's songs sound as good as ever; better perhaps, embedded in the history of the past 33 years.

gebauer said:



Tue, 2006-12-12 22:22
It is interisting that the autor is a Larrain.

Those who know something about Chile would

instantly recognise that aristrocratic family

name. Like Altamirano, and others, descendants

of the ancient colonial chilean aristocracy.

Now, as the roman patricians did, they rewrite

history to their convenience. Of course Pinochet

was a tyrant, but why did he came to power?

It seems that history starts the year 1973

and not before. My family had to flee Chile

in year 1971 because everybody was talking of

commiting their own "coup de etat". ALL.

And my grand father, a spaniard republican said

to my father: "Flee while you can because the

bloodbath comes!", Everybody said that my father

was crazy, and then it happened.

But what came was the result of an old and yet

not investigated process, in wich the social

class of mister Larrain was involved, leading

the left and also the right side of the

political spectrum.

c.carrasco said:



Wed, 2006-12-13 08:18
Larrin article is pathetic and fail to establish 3 key issues. Some weeks ago Milton Friedman die too. Together they leave the legacy of Globalization with Impunity. That is the brutal and criminal introduction on monetrary policies aroud the world. The dismantelling of the State property to private hands. Chile more than ever is a divide society, the gap between rich and poor has increased dramatically. Nor in Chile or anywehere else in the world one dear to challange these principle. it is the "New Religion"

Chile used to be one of the most vibrant countries in Latin America; intellectually, culturally, scientifically, politically, socially. Today Chile is ruled by mediocracy, people are psychological traumatrized, living in fear (by the military, the economic and political elite). Only few brave voices have the gutts to challange these state of affairs.

No only the Chilean justice have failed, the international community too. While under the custody in the UK, the Labour goverment (Jack Straw et all) expediently washed their hands. The Chilean community in the UK privately gave "intelligent information" to the Labour goverment, the Party and others that Pinochet has been "coached" by Chilean intelligence officers to "fake" his lost of memory and unfitness for trial. Ohh Mr Blair, ohh Mr Straw the Masters of the Universe" One brutal dictator has gone to the grave, but his legacy will leave for a long time. Crimes to humanity can go on with impunity in Chile and anywhere else in the world.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options

Remember to login to have your comments properly attributed

Login or Register to be identified in your comments

16 days blog

Just published:
Podcast - Afaf Jabiri takes on the Jordanian government
Articles - Jameen Kaur, India's silent tragedy
Rebecca Barlow, women and conflict
Blog:

50.50 blog