It will be interesting to see exactly which customs the Vatican is going to allow from the past rich five centuries of Anglican worship, life and thought.
Quote of the day
 ColumnsPaul Rogers Li Datong Fred Halliday Mary Kaldor Daniele Archibugi The World
Email & RSSSign up to oD's editorial summaries email:
Who's linking?NavigationOur Authors around the Web
|
 |
what about faith?Guest editor and Columist Dave Belden, a self-confessed agnostic, challenges us all to examine what faith and religion mean to us in the 21st Century. From the most extreme fundamentalism to cosmopolitan cynics, we all want something to believe in.
The first graduation of rabbis in Germany since 1945 is an opportunity to revivify the great German-Jewish cultural symbiosis and to place Jewish community life anew at Europe's heart, says Julia Neuberger, in her address to mark the occasion at Dresden’s Abraham Geiger College.
When Britain's prime minister mentions God on primetime TV, millions of citizens are puzzled or outraged. Is this Tony Blair's problem, or theirs? Callum Brown traces the long withdrawing whimper of "Christian Britain".
Pope Benedict XVI must address African poverty to avoid jettisoning the Catholic Church’s African following, and his predecessor’s legacy, says David Mikhail.
In his long life, the Polish pope, Karol Wojtyła, was at the forefront of the struggle for liberty. But in his twenty-six years at the Vatican, where did this towering figure stand on democracy? The distinguished writer Neal Ascherson dissects an ambiguous legacy.
Mel Gibson’s controversial new film, “The Passion of Christ”, is violent, harrowing and almost impossible to watch. So don’t, recommends Dave Belden.
The Shaker religious community survived 18th century emigration from England to America to build a pacific community of sexual equals. Its founder’s “birthday” on 29 February is an occasion to celebrate a creative adaptation embodied in the Shakers’ unique design heritage.
The argument of Khoren Arisian that religious extremism poses a danger to American democracy is simplistic and ahistorical. The Puritan impact on American politics contains egalitarian vigour as well as intolerance, social conscience as well as theological dogma. Be patient, says Dave Belden: the descendants of today’s fundamentalists will champion a new era of social liberalism.
The danger of religious fundamentalism has been present in the American political bloodstream since the arrival of the Puritans. Now, with a government of religious conservatives locked in a polarising mindset of us-them and good-evil, the threat it poses is not just to American freedom, but to the world’s.
Hollywood products like “The Matrix”, “X-Men” and their sequels indulge the spectacle of violence and terrorism in the name of a nebulous ‘truth’, and thus echo the very mental strategies of al-Qaida. But they also make available narratives of meaning that illuminate the realities of power which imprison the world. Should their consumers be alarmed or amused?
A wary platform encounter with a self-styled spiritual warrior offers unexpectedly renewed hope to a weary Omair Ahmad.
In the aftermath of a cancer operation, inveterate sceptic and openDemocracy columnist Dave Belden is treated by a healer. Might his sickness really have roots in his childhood? Can she address its cause at the level of ‘energy’? If so, what else might she heal? Is she a cheap gypsy or the real thing? What does he believe?
The addictions to bad news and to boosterism are alike protections from reality. One encourages cynicism, the other complacency; both evade responsibility for the world’s horror. For Dave Belden, it has been a long road to global optimism. But in the wake of the avalanche of violence and grief in the Iraq war, he wonders if giving up TV is a condition of sustaining long-term hope for the planet.
The trouble with close-knit groups, according to psychiatrist Arthur Deikman, is that they stop thinking realistically. Is this true of the Bush team? Could this Iraq war be Bush’s Bay of Pigs, rather than his Cuban missile crisis?
Radical dreamers, often religious, have shaped today’s democracies. In a fundamentalist age like ours, how can we be inspired by them without falling foul of their totalitarian tendencies?
In the interests of democracy and wealth creation, we need both Davos and Porto Alegre, and we need them to work together.
Where Dave Belden lives, the computer has put every home, school, neighbourhood in close encounter with fantasies of power, violence, and lust. Should we fortify our minds, or learn how to live freely amongst darkness?
As traditional societies cross the bridge to modernity, is their encounter with the globalised world bound to erupt in religious conflict? Or is there another way across?
Returning to openDemocracy after his father’s funeral, Dave Belden salutes his positive outlook and sturdy belief, before engaging in his readers’ earlier responses.
In dialogue with Dave Belden, one Muslim Indian living in America voices the optimism of a rising generation. In an atmosphere of freedom to speak the truth, and despite political oppression in Islamic states and secularist pressures in the west, Muslims are making progress by changing from within the faith.
A young Dutch woman of Somali origin is in deep trouble for criticising Islam. To a writer formed within a tight religious community, her travails reveal a chasm where our understanding of the connections between religion, freedom and democracy should be. Dave Belden fuses the personal and political to illuminate a key contest of the new century: not left vs right, but multicultural vs universal.
Islamic and Western governments share a concern to define just behaviour and just government. But the advocacy of universal human rights by secular democracies challenges the idea of basing social order on religious principle. In a discussion co-hosted by the Iranian government and London’s Goethe Institute, two respected scholars debate the tensions between – and within –their different conceptions of social justice.
The discussion at London’s Goethe Institute between Heiner Bielefeldt and Mohammad Saeed Bahmanpour on Islam, human rights, and social justice was followed by a vigorous debate. How does Samuel Huntington’s ‘Clash of Civilizations’ argument measure up to the experience of Sudan, Turkey and Iran? Is the application of sharia law in modern states realistic or desirable? And is secularism a lived reality or a social ideal?
Dave Belden invites you to engage with him in debating some really awkward questions about believers and the challenge they pose to secular developed societies, just as developed societies pose a challenge to believers. He starts with Islam.
|
|
|
Recent comments
11 hours 57 min ago
14 hours 23 min ago
18 hours 2 min ago
21 hours 24 min ago
21 hours 58 min ago
23 hours 26 min ago
23 hours 35 min ago
1 day 1 hour ago
1 day 2 hours ago
1 day 6 hours ago