Representing différence
Article 1 de la loi n° 2004-228 du 15 mars 2004, inséré dans le code de l’éducation.
In February 2004, French MPs voted 494 to 36 in favour of legislation banning ostentatious religious symbolism in schoolwear. Could anything have been worse – one might ask – than such a large consensus among the political parties to promote a law that, in much of its implementation and outcomes, generates exclusion from state schools (47 individuals since September 2004), accentuates gender inequality by being directed mostly at women, and exacerbates indirect discrimination (did it occur to no one to remember the Sikhs during the preparation of this law)? But let us ask: would there have been a better result had more women been sitting in the French Parliament when these decisions were taken?
Islam and democracy: an interview with Heba Ezzat
Meeting Heba Ezzat
From Joseph Ratzinger to Pope Benedict XVI
Cardinal Chernenko?
The Catholic church is not a democracy
Catholics, Iraq, women, and modernity
The Catholic church and democracy: a reply to Neal Ascherson
The Vatican, the Kremlin and the Feminine
The five minutes of Pope John Paul II
Cutting the Vatican down to size
Cardinal Arns of Brazil on Pope John Paul II, the Vatican and the poor
Through the Vatican white smoke
Pope John Paul II and democracy
Have faith in the People!
Lebanon before and after Syria
China's values vacuum
A humane Muslim future
A law to close minds
Raising children!and Republicans
This week's guest editors
Our guest editors James Ron, Leslie Vinjamuri, Sophie Arie and Archana Pandya introduce this week's theme of:
Our guest editors James Ron, Leslie Vinjamuri, Sophie Arie and Archana Pandya introduce this week's theme of:
A Turkish Spring?






.jpg)































