Part of the openDemocracy Network

About Global Deal

Global Deal investigates new pathways in the international politics of climate change. Read more

Global Deal is a joint project of openDemocracy and E3G. Global Deal is financially supported by the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation.

Esmee Fairbairn Foundation, E3G and openDemocracy Logos

Receive Global Deal News

Grab the Global Deal RSS Feed

Global Deal Newswire

Or join the Global Deal mailing list

Enter your name and email address below to join our mailing list and become a member of openDemocracy. You may unsubscribe at any time.


Global Deal Widget

Want this on your site? Copy this code into your HTML

Economics in depth series

The Liberty of the Networked, Tony Curzon Price

Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3

US response: fat chance

David Steven, 10 - 12 - 2007
delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

A few minutes ago, US negotiator, Harlan Watson, made it crystal clear that he has absolutely no intention of signing up to the draft Bali roadmap.

That's no to a 25-40% target by 2020 for developed countries - something Watson thinks would prejudge negotiations and be "totally unrealistic for many countries."

And no, to adding to the text a goal to keep temperatures below 2 degrees, a key European demand. That would not be a helpful starting point for negotiations, he says.

Watson also called for the draft text to be dramatically shortened and simplified, telling the media that "almost every delegation thinks its too long."

Watson advised reporters not to put too much weight on IPCC recommendations on the scale of findings available:

Quote:
I want to remind you that 25-40% figure came out of the IPCC third assessment report, working group 3.

That analysis involved six scenarios out of 177 that were examined. It is a small subset. Many uncertainties are surrounding that and, obviously, there's going to need to be a lot of analysis done over the course of the negotiations.

To start with a predetermined answer is not an appropriate thing to do.

Watson was also dismissive an argument made by Yvo de Boer of the United Nations, that a headline goal now would guide investment decisions over the next couple of years.

"It's unclear how a notional number would guide investment decisions...numbers which for many countries would be entirely realistic," he argued.
 

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img> <map>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options