Global Deal investigates new pathways in the international politics of climate change. Read more
Global Deal is a joint project of openDemocracy and E3G. Global Deal is financially supported by the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation.
About Global DealReceive Global Deal NewsGrab the Global Deal RSS FeedGlobal Deal NewswireOr join the Global Deal mailing listEnter your name and email address below to join our mailing list and become a member of openDemocracy. You may unsubscribe at any time. Global Deal Widget
Want this on your site? Copy this code into your HTML
BlogTalkRadio tags in Global Deal |
US - hubristic, arrogant |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
The Europeans don't like the message they're getting from the Americans that the IPCC goal of a 25-40% target is based on insufficient evidence to be a useful guide. "We don't need new studies and research," the German Environment Minister, Sigmar Gabriel. "If we ask the scientists, they're just going to tell us the same thing. We have to reduce 25-40% in developed countries if we want to be on target for 2050. "It's not a question of known science. It's a question of mathematics. These questions of mathematics are clear since the Egyptians taught us to count." Speaking off the record, a member of the EU delegation agreed.
The
IPCC has told us a great deal over the last year about how we should set the
level of ambition.
The
American position was hubristic, if not arrogant, the delegate concluded, and
based on the view that one could ‘negotiate' the level at which dangerous
climate change will kick in.
There is an amazing degree of solidity which has built up in the basic science. Of course, there are uncertainties, but they are second and third order uncertainties. The IPCC tells us to achieve 25-40% cuts in developed countries and turn the emissions curve around in fifteen years. There's a lot of robust science behind that. Trackback URL for this post:http://www.opendemocracy.net/trackback/35386
| | | | | | | |
|
Want this on your site? Copy this code into your HTML