Global Deal investigates new pathways in the international politics of climate change. Read more
Global Deal is a joint project of openDemocracy and E3G. Global Deal is financially supported by the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation.

Part of the openDemocracy Network
About Global DealGlobal Deal investigates new pathways in the international politics of climate change. Read more Global Deal is a joint project of openDemocracy and E3G. Global Deal is financially supported by the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation. ![]() Receive Global Deal NewsGrab the Global Deal RSS FeedGlobal Deal NewswireOr join the Global Deal mailing listEnter your name and email address below to join our mailing list and become a member of openDemocracy. You may unsubscribe at any time. Global Deal Widget
Want this on your site? Copy this code into your HTML
tags in Global Deal |
Breaking: Draft agreement issuedBBC News 24 has just announced on air that a short draft agreement has been issued in Bali. Ban Ki Moon is flying back in to Bali to participate in the final push. They hope to speak to Roger Harrabin in Bali shortly... And here he is, before I can even hit publish: 'Urgent language but no numbers' is the headline. The EU desire for numbers is satisfied by a footnote - a major achievement for the USA. Plenary meeting will be held over the next couple of hours to discuss. Will the poorest countries reject this draft? Question from the studio: even if numbers had been included, they wouldn't have been binding would they? Indeed - and the EU's hoped-for stabilisation target and long term goal are not in either. This document is a compromise, can the Chairman get it through? So, what's Roger's feeling on where things stand? Roger's gut feeling - he hopes this is the end point on these negotiations, but fears it may not be. Last night - working groups were called off as the negotiations were getting so acrimonious. Conference president pulled together final text. Significance is that it pulls in all countries into the forward process on curbing emissions. The glass is back to that half-full vs half-empty stage... Trackback URL for this post:http://www.opendemocracy.net/trackback/35420
|