Global Deal investigates new pathways in the international politics of climate change. Read more
Global Deal is a joint project of openDemocracy and E3G. Global Deal is financially supported by the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation.

Part of the openDemocracy Network
About Global DealGlobal Deal investigates new pathways in the international politics of climate change. Read more Global Deal is a joint project of openDemocracy and E3G. Global Deal is financially supported by the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation. ![]() Receive Global Deal NewsGrab the Global Deal RSS FeedGlobal Deal NewswireOr join the Global Deal mailing listEnter your name and email address below to join our mailing list and become a member of openDemocracy. You may unsubscribe at any time. Global Deal Widget
Want this on your site? Copy this code into your HTML
tags in Global Deal |
Rudd to the rescue?Australia's position has been all over the place here in Bali. On day 1, it was showered with praise for ratifying Kyoto (a politically costless task as it is already on track to meet its target). Since then, it has flip flopped over targets for industrialized countries. Today, its trade minister has further fanned the flames of discontent. "Australia's task is at the appropriate time to commit to targets but it's also to try and secure binding commitments from developing countries," Simon Crean is reported as saying by ABC News. Ismid Hadad, Secretary-General of Indonesia's delegation, seemed a little nonplussed when I read him this quote and asked for comment. Indonesia have invited Trade Ministers to Bali this weekend for an informal meeting that runs alongside the main UN conference. They're rather proud of the initiative. It's the first time that the implications of trade for climate change have been considered in this way. Thirty-two countries have sent representatives - with Ministers from twelve countries, including the USA, Australia, Brazil, and Portugal (which has the EU Presidency) - making the trip. So what of Mr Crean's comments? Irmin Hadad dispatched them with the usual formula: developing countries have no obligations under the present framework, and that's how he expects it to stay. There was a role for Australia in helping poor countries develop more sustainably, he said. Yvo de Boer takes a similar position. Yesterday, he told the press that there was little prospect of binding caps for developing countries "It's not off the table, but I have a feeling it's crawling towards the edge," he said. So why is Australia's position proving so ambiguous? There are two common interpretations. Conspiracy: its commitment to combating climate is only skin deep (many of the NGOs fear this is true). Cock-up: the new government is finding its feet, while its negotiating team retains ingrained habits from the Howard era (you'll hear this from the delegations). I prefer a slightly different conspiracy theory. Kevin Rudd sees himself as a potential savour at these talks, riding in next week to ‘build a bridge' between China and the rest of the world. Why not play down expectations in week one, then? Then Rudd stun us all with a big announcement. What better way to add to the lustre of his honeymoon period, both at home and abroad.Post new comment |