Quote of the day

Nothing is necessarily as you thought it was, and you should never believe what you're told until you've had a chance to study it for yourselves

Syndicate content

Login

Login or Register to be identified in your comments

Email & RSS

Sign up to oD's editorial summaries email:



Add oD to your Netvibes: Add to Netvibes

HANS BLIX on IRAQI WMDS: Jan. 29, 2003


Posts: 97
Joined: 2003-06-19
This was Blix's position six weeks before the war began. Surprised, lefties? Hans Blix addressing the UN, January, 2003. Chemical Weapons The document indicates that 13,000 chemical bombs were dropped by the Iraqi Air Force between 1983 and 1988, while Iraq has declared that 19,500 bombs were consumed during this period. Thus, there is a discrepancy of 6,500 bombs. The amount of chemical agent in these bombs would be in the order of about 1,000 tonnes. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we must assume that these quantities are now unaccounted for. The discovery of a number of 122 mm chemical rocket warheads in a bunker at a storage depot 170 km southwest of Baghdad was much publicized. This was a relatively new bunker and therefore the rockets must have been moved there in the past few years, at a time when Iraq should not have had such munitions. The investigation of these rockets is still proceeding. Iraq states that they were overlooked from 1991 from a batch of some 2,000 that were stored there during the Gulf War. This could be the case. They could also be the tip of a submerged iceberg. The discovery of a few rockets does not resolve but rather points to the issue of several thousands of chemical rockets that are unaccounted for. http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/Bx27.htm [Edited by: oD Forum Moderator. Copyright: please post a couple of paragraphs only, with the link to the source at the end. Thanks!]



Posts: 1152
Joined: 2005-05-01
Re: HANS BLIX on IRAQI WMDS: Jan. 29, 2003
Kwatt - Twatt. Read David Kay, Bush's own man.



Posts: 1706
Joined: 2005-03-26
Re: HANS BLIX on IRAQI WMDS: Jan. 29, 2003
brolly, Perhaps you should read MORE about David Kay. He was a UN weapons investigators. His inspections convinced him the Iraqis were hiding WMD. The Bush Administration believed him. Kay cited faulty intelligence, not Bush personally, for the misiniformation about WMD. His inspection of Iraq after the invasion found some biological research going on in violation of UN mandates. They were not yet weaponized. Kay thought Saddam a very dangerous man, capable of restarting his WMD programs. In 2004, despite the lack of actual WMD, he still supported the decision to invade.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options

Remember to login to have your comments properly attributed

Login or Register to be identified in your comments